Pixelated Digital Camouflage vs. Traditional Camouflage For Hunting and Combat

3. Determining a change

As time passed by, the United States thought that there was a better way to attain camouflage other than the traditional way, and in 2004, they introduced the pixelated digital camouflage at a massive cost of over $5 billion. You might be wondering why exactly they wanted to improve on an already excellent idea. The thing is, for the United States, nothing is perfect enough. They believe that everything can be improved upon if you just keep throwing money at it. After all, a single camouflage design can only work in a specific period. What could be better than introducing a design which would work for all situations? The simple answer was that such a design did not work in a single environment and was universally criticized. This led to an entire revamping of the camouflage design.

Pixelated Digital Camouflage vs. Traditional Camouflage For Hunting and Combat

Straight 8 Photography/Shutterstock.com