Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA)’s stock has been choppy over the last five years, with the stock falling 6% since November 2021. Tesla has been notorious for being one of the most difficult stocks to value because of its ambition to become something much larger than just an automaker. While Tesla continues to sell electric vehicles and energy-storage products, management is putting AI, autonomous driving, Robotaxi, and Optimus at the center of its long-term strategy. That raises a more interesting question than simply whether the EV giant’s stock is expensive: What is the market actually paying for?
Tesla’s 2025 revenue fell to $94.8 billion, while net income declined to $3.8 billion. The company’s growth seems to be stagnating. Yet management continues to invest heavily in businesses that some might say are still in their nascent stages.
DON’T MISS: Tesla (TSLA) vs Rivian (RIVN): Which is a Better EV Stock to Buy
Tesla’s valuation illustrates just how much investors are looking beyond just its current earnings. At first glance, the stock seems ultra-expensive. It trades at about 158.7x forward earnings. However, that multiple is partly inflated by the company’s depressed near-term profitability. Tesla’s operating margin fell to just 1.4% in the second quarter as a result of lower vehicle pricing, higher costs, and the aforementioned increased spending on other businesses, which is likely to put pressure on earnings for the foreseeable future.
That makes the price-to-earnings multiple somewhat misleading on its own. Investors are not simply paying for Tesla’s current earnings; they are paying for the possibility that Robotaxi, FSD, Optimus, and other AI-related businesses can eventually become much larger sources of profit.
Hadrian / Shutterstock.com
Bull Case
The strongest argument for Tesla is that the market is buying that narrative. It is not really valuing it as a traditional car company anymore. The management says it is focused on bringing AI into the real world through FSD, Robotaxi, and Optimus, while leveraging its existing vehicle and energy businesses, which would be used as a foundation for these products.
Robotaxi is particularly important because it could change the economics of Tesla’s vehicle business. Instead of making money primarily by selling a car once, Tesla could generate recurring revenue from autonomous vehicles operating as a service. Earlier this month, the company began offering limited public rides in Austin using its purpose-built Cybercab, which is a two-seat vehicle without a steering wheel or pedals. While the launch represents an important step toward Tesla’s autonomous-driving ambitions, the rollout remains limited and could attract more scrutiny from the regulators.
Optimus provides an even more speculative source of potential value. Tesla is using the AI technology developed for autonomous driving to advance the humanoid robot. This could mean that the company could potentially apply its AI and manufacturing capabilities to a completely different market. Management has also said that producing Optimus is one of the reasons behind its heavy capex cycle.
Bear Case
The obvious problem is that a significant part of Tesla’s current valuation depends on businesses that have yet to demonstrate their full economic potential. Autonomous driving, Robotaxi, and Optimus could become enormous businesses, but there is still uncertainty around how quickly they can scale and how profitable they will eventually be.
Tesla is also spending enormous amounts of money to build that future. Management expects 2026 capital expenditures to exceed $25 billion, while the company acknowledges that heavy investment in AI, software, and fleet-based businesses will weigh on profitability during this phase.
Another threat that the company faces is that it does not have the autonomous market to itself. Other companies are already developing their own robotaxi networks and autonomous-driving technology, meaning Tesla will have to compete for both riders and the economics of the market. If autonomous driving becomes widely available across different platforms, Tesla’s ability to turn its technology into a uniquely high-margin business could be more limited than investors expect.
Conclusion
Tesla, Inc. is hard to value like a traditional automotive company because markets are clearly looking beyond its auto business. Robotaxi, FSD, Optimus, AI infrastructure, and energy storage could all become major sources of value. But Tesla still has to turn those ambitions into businesses that can actually generate meaningful profits. The bigger question is how much of that future is already reflected in the stock price.
Market Sentiment
According to Insider Monkey’s database, 116 hedge funds held Tesla at the end of Q2, down from 123 in the previous quarter. However, the value of their combined holdings increased slightly to about $23.8 billion, from $23.1 billion previously.
READ NEXT: Lucid (LCID) Rises After Bolt Partnership, But Cash Burn Remains a Concern OR Meta (META)’s Stilla.ai Deal Could Turn Business Agent Into a New Monetization Engine
This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
