Shelf placement is becoming an increasingly important competitive weapon at Walmart Inc. (NYSE:WMT) and Target Corporation (NYSE:TGT). Haleon, the company behind Sensodyne, Advil, and Centrum, has negotiated more prominent positions at the two retailers by offering lower prices, stronger promotions, exclusive products, and other improved commercial terms.
The strategy appears to be benefiting Haleon, whose share of the US consumer-health market increased from 11.4% in February to 12% by August, according to NielsenIQ data cited by Reuters. For Walmart and Target, the arrangement demonstrates how their scale can attract better supplier offers, but it also reflects mounting pressure to satisfy increasingly cost-conscious shoppers.
Bull Case
Walmart and Target control valuable access to millions of consumers, giving them leverage when negotiating with major suppliers. Haleon’s willingness to provide lower prices, promotional support, product exclusivity, and new innovations in return for better shelf space shows how retailers can use that position to improve their product offering. Prominent placement could also make stores easier to shop. Haleon researched how consumers locate health products and found that shoppers look for brands first, followed by premium and new items within the same brand section. Products placed at eye level or immediately above existing ranges may therefore be easier to identify.
For Walmart, the agreement fits its effort to emphasize value as consumers concentrate spending on essential goods. The retailer recently reduced prices on 11,000 items as elevated gasoline costs caused shoppers to make more trade-offs. Stronger supplier promotions in toothpaste, pain relief, and vitamins could reinforce Walmart’s value proposition without relying entirely on company-funded price reductions. Target could receive similar benefits from better supplier terms and differentiated products. Exclusivity may give shoppers a reason to choose one retailer over another, while new products and prominent displays can support category sales.
Evidence from Haleon suggests the shelf changes are influencing consumer behavior. The company said improved placement has supported market-share gains in oral health, which includes Sensodyne, Aquafresh, and Polident. Haleon also reported better performance in adult vitamins after Centrum products were placed at eye level and supported with promotions. This offers a potential win for both sides: Haleon gains visibility. At the same time, Walmart and Target receive more competitive prices and promotional investment from a supplier motivated to increase market share.
Bear Case
The strategy also exposes how difficult the consumer environment has become. Middle-class Americans are increasingly price-conscious amid elevated fuel costs, and recent retail results indicate that consumers are directing more of their budgets toward essentials. Even Walmart, traditionally positioned to benefit when shoppers seek value, reported its slowest comparable-store sales growth in six years despite rolling back prices across thousands of products. Additional supplier promotions may help, but they do not eliminate the wider pressure on discretionary spending.
Heavy promotional activity can also make growth less durable. More than 21% of Haleon’s second-quarter US sales came from products sold with promotions, according to NielsenIQ data analyzed by Bernstein. Haleon’s market-share improvement therefore does not establish that the shelf resets generated equally strong full-price demand. Reuters reported that Walmart and Target declined to comment. There is also no guarantee that Haleon’s gains will continue, as competing consumer-health companies can respond with their own discounts, promotions, or exclusive products, potentially intensifying competition for premium shelf positions.
Conclusion
Haleon’s shelf-space negotiations demonstrate the commercial power Walmart and Target retain over suppliers. Both retailers can use their scale to obtain lower prices, promotions, and exclusive merchandise at a time when shoppers are demanding greater value.
The immediate economics remain undisclosed, however. Better shelf arrangements may strengthen essential-product categories, but they cannot fully offset weak consumer spending. The advantage for Walmart and Target will depend on whether supplier-funded promotions produce lasting traffic and sales rather than temporary, discount-driven gains.
READ NEXT: Can Eli Lilly Catch Novo Nordisk in the Oral GLP-1 Race? AND Abbott vs. Intuitive Surgical: Is Consistent Growth Better Than Premium Growth?
This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
