Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Google Inc. (GOOG): Aussie High Court Ruling Due Today

Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) has a ubiquitous network of advertising all over the world, and it has algorithms in place to determine the best ads that fit with certain search keywords. But should a company like Google be responsible for checking on the legitimacy of links tht are placed on ads, or check for misleading advertising? Should that be the responsibility of the advertiser? In Australia, some of those questions could be answered legally today.

The Australia High Court is due to rule today on an interesting case regarding Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) and companies that advertise with Google. This case involves an Australian classified-ad business The Trading Post, which is accused to having misleading advertisements, as spotted by an Australian consumer watchdog group. Google figures into this in that it is being accused of allowing The Trading Post to publish these advertisements, which involved using the names of two rival car dealerships to entice consumers to click on The Trading Post advertisement to lead to related classified ads regarding cars for sale. The claim was that having the dealerships’ names on the ad was misleading in that the link didn’t go to either of the dealership sites but instead going to The Trading Post.

Google Inc (GOOG)This case first came up in 2007 when the consumer-watchdog, ACCC, filed suit against The Trading Post, Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG), Google Australia and Google Ireland with allegations of misrepresentations, and alleging that Google allows advertisers present a connection with other businesses when one doesn’t exist. The ACCC is targeting Google in this case to try to prevent such misrepresentations from happening again, making the web site that publishes the ad responsible for the content. There are millions of dollars at stake in this case.

The Full Federal Court in Australia sided with ACCC last April, but the High Court granted Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) an appeal in June.

What might this mean in the search and online advertising market?

DOWNLOAD FREE REPORT: Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks

Let Warren Buffett, George Soros, Steve Cohen, and Daniel Loeb WORK FOR YOU.

If you want to beat the low cost index funds by 19 percentage points per year, look no further than our monthly newsletter.In this free report you can find an in-depth analysis of the performance of Warren Buffett's entire historical stock picks. We uncovered Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks and a way to for Buffett to improve his returns by more than 4 percentage points per year.

Bonus Biotech Stock Pick: You can also find a detailed bonus biotech stock pick that we expect to return more than 50% within 12 months.
Subscribe me to Insider Monkey's Free Daily Newsletter
This is a FREE report from Insider Monkey. Credit Card is NOT required.