Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) recently reported its preliminary financial results based on which we provide a unique peer-based analysis of the company. Our analysis is based on the company’s performance over the last twelve months (unless stated otherwise). For a more detailed analysis of this company (and over 40,000 other global equities) please visit www.capitalcube.com.
Northrop Grumman Corp.’s analysis versus peers uses the following peer-set: The Boeing Company (NYSE:BA), Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT), General Dynamics Corporation (NYSE:GD), Raytheon Company (NYSE:RTN), BAE SYSTEMS PLC ORD (PINK:BAESF), Rockwell Collins, Inc. (NYSE:COL) and L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:LLL). The table below shows the preliminary results along with the recent trend for revenues, net income and returns.
Northrop Grumman Corp. trades at a lower Price/Book multiple (1.6) than its peer median (4.4). The market expects NOC-US to grow earnings about as fast as the median of its chosen peers (PE of 8.8 compared to peer median of 9.7) but not to expect much improvement in its below peer median rates of return (ROE of 17.4% compared to the peer median ROE of 23.8%).
The company’s asset efficiency (asset turns of 1.0x) and net profit margins of 7.9% are both median for its peer group. NOC-US’s net margin is similar to last year’s high of 7.9%, which compares to a low of -3.8% in 2008.
The company’s top line performance is not as good as its peers (year-on-year change in revenue is -24.0%) but its earnings performance (2.4% change year-on-year) has been similar to the peer median. Unless the company maintains or improves this relative earnings growth, it is in danger of lagging its peers.
NOC-US’s current return on assets is around the same as its peer median (7.9% vs. peer median 7.3%). This recent performance contrasts with its less than peer median return on assets over the past five years (4.1% vs. peer median 6.8%) suggesting that the company’s relative operating performance is improving.
The company’s gross margin of 23.7% is around peer median suggesting that NOC-US’s operations do not benefit from any differentiating pricing advantage. However, NOC-US’s pre-tax margin is more than the peer median (11.7% compared to 9.7%) suggesting relatively tight control on operating costs.
Growth & Investment Strategy
While NOC-US’s revenues growth has been below the peer median in the last few years (-8.0% vs. 1.5% respectively for the past three years), the market still gives the stock an about peer median PE ratio of 8.8. The market seems to see the company as a long-term strategic bet.
NOC-US’s annualized rate of change in capital of -3.4% over the past three years is less than its peer median of 3.0%. This below median investment level has also generated a less than peer median return on capital of 11.3% averaged over the same three years. This outcome suggests that the company has invested capital relatively poorly and now may be in maintenance mode.
NOC-US’s net income margin for the last twelve months is around the peer median (7.9% vs. peer median of 7.3%). This average margin and relatively conservative accrual policy (3.6% vs. peer median of 2.5%) suggests possible understatement of its reported net income.
NOC-US’s accruals over the last twelve months are positive suggesting a buildup of reserves. In addition, the level of accrual is greater than the peer median — which suggests a relatively strong buildup in reserves compared to its peers.
Northrop Grumman Corp. is a global security company which provides innovative systems, products and solutions in aerospace, electronics, information systems, and technical services to government and commercial customers worldwide. The company operates through four business segments: Aerospace Systems, Electronic Systems, Information Systems, and Technical Services. The Aerospace Systems segment is a premier developer, integrator, producer and supporter of manned and unmanned aircraft, spacecraft, high-energy laser systems, microelectronics and other systems and subsystems critical to maintaining the nation’s security and leadership in technology. Aerospace Systems’ customers include government agencies and use these systems in many different mission areas, including intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance; communications; battle management; strike operations; electronic warfare; missile defense; earth observation; space science; and space exploration. The segment consists of four business areas: Strike & Surveillance Systems; Space Systems; Battle Management & Engagement Systems; and Advanced Programs & Technology. The Electronic Systems segment is engaged in the design, development, manufacture, and support of solutions for sensing, understanding, anticipating, and controlling the environment for global military, civil, and commercial customers and their operations. Electronic Systems provides a variety of defense electronics and systems, airborne fire control radars, situational awareness systems, early warning systems, airspace management systems, navigation systems, communications systems, marine systems, space systems, and logistics services. This segment consists of five business areas: Intelligence, Surveillance & Reconnaissance Systems; Land & Self Protection Systems; Naval & Marine Systems; Navigation Systems; and Targeting Systems. The Information Systems segment is a global provider of advanced solutions for the DoD, intelligence, federal civilian, state and local agencies, and international customers. This segment products and services are focused on the fields of command, control, communications, computers and intelligence; air and missile defense; airborne reconnaissance; intelligence processing; decision support systems; cybersecurity; information technology; and systems engineering and systems integration. This segment consists of three business areas: Defense Systems, Intelligence Systems, and Civil Systems. The Technical Services segment is a provider of logistics, infrastructure, and sustainment support, while also providing a wide array of technical services, including training and simulation. This segment consists of three areas of business: Defense and Government Services division; Training Solutions division; and Integrated Logistics and Modernization Division. The company was founded by Jack Northrop founded in 1939 and is headquartered in Falls Church, VA.
The information presented in this report has been obtained from sources deemed to be reliable, but AnalytixInsight does not make any representation about the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of this information. This report was produced by AnalytixInsight for informational purposes only and nothing contained herein should be construed as an offer to buy or sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security or derivative instrument. This report is current only as of the date that it was published and the opinions, estimates, ratings and other information may change without notice or publication. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Prior to making an investment or other financial decision, please consult with your financial, legal and tax advisors. AnalytixInsight shall not be liable for any party’s use of this report. AnalytixInsight is not a broker-dealer and does not buy, sell, maintain a position, or make a market in any security referred to herein. One of the principal tenets for us at AnalytixInsight is that the best person to handle your finances is you. By your use of our services or by reading any our reports, you’re agreeing that you bear responsibility for your own investment research and investment decisions. You also agree that AnalytixInsight, its directors, its employees, and its agents will not be liable for any investment decision made or action taken by you and others based on news, information, opinion, or any other material generated by us and/or published through our services. For a complete copy of our disclaimer, please visit our website www.analytixinsight.com.
This article was originally written by abha.dawesar, and posted on CapitalCube.
Warren Buffett never mentions this but he is one of the first hedge fund managers who unlocked the secrets of successful stock market investing. He launched his hedge fund in 1956 with $105,100 in seed capital. Back then they weren’t called hedge funds, they were called “partnerships”. Warren Buffett took 25% of all returns in excess of 6 percent.
For example S&P 500 Index returned 43.4% in 1958. If Warren Buffett’s hedge fund didn’t generate any outperformance (i.e. secretly invested like a closet index fund), Warren Buffett would have pocketed a quarter of the 37.4% excess return. That would have been 9.35% in hedge fund “fees”.
Actually Warren Buffett failed to beat the S&P 500 Index in 1958, returned only 40.9% and pocketed 8.7 percentage of it as “fees”. His investors didn’t mind that he underperformed the market in 1958 because he beat the market by a large margin in 1957. That year Buffett’s hedge fund returned 10.4% and Buffett took only 1.1 percentage points of that as “fees”. S&P 500 Index lost 10.8% in 1957, so Buffett’s investors actually thrilled to beat the market by 20.1 percentage points in 1957.
Between 1957 and 1966 Warren Buffett’s hedge fund returned 23.5% annually after deducting Warren Buffett’s 5.5 percentage point annual fees. S&P 500 Index generated an average annual compounded return of only 9.2% during the same 10-year period. An investor who invested $10,000 in Warren Buffett’s hedge fund at the beginning of 1957 saw his capital turn into $103,000 before fees and $64,100 after fees (this means Warren Buffett made more than $36,000 in fees from this investor).
As you can guess, Warren Buffett’s #1 wealth building strategy is to generate high returns in the 20% to 30% range.
We see several investors trying to strike it rich in options market by risking their entire savings. You can get rich by returning 20% per year and compounding that for several years. Warren Buffett has been investing and compounding for at least 65 years.
So, how did Warren Buffett manage to generate high returns and beat the market?
In a free sample issue of our monthly newsletter we analyzed Warren Buffett’s stock picks covering the 1999-2017 period and identified the best performing stocks in Warren Buffett’s portfolio. This is basically a recipe to generate better returns than Warren Buffett is achieving himself.
You can enter your email below to get our FREE report. In the same report you can also find a detailed bonus biotech stock pick that we expect to return more than 50% within 12-24 months. We initially share this idea in October 2018 and the stock already returned more than 150%. We still like this investment.
Free Report Reveals
Warren Buffet's Secret Recipe
Our Price: $199FREE
Wall Street Legend Warns: “A Strange Day Is Coming to America”