On August 12, 2026, the Wall Street Journal reported that Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is discussing new, multiyear deals with publishers to license their content for an AI-upgraded Siri expected to launch later this year.
Why This Matters
Siri has been criticized for years for lacking real utility. Apple’s fix depends partly on paying outside publishers for current news and information rather than building that capability entirely in-house.
Does this partnership finally solve Siri’s relevance problem, or does it show Apple still can’t build a competitive AI assistant without leaning on others?
The Bull Case
Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) has proposed a variable, pay-as-you-go compensation structure, paying publishers specifically when their content gets used, with a possible nine-figure budget discussed for the payments. It is a different model from the guaranteed flat fees typical of big AI licensing deals. Apple already has a track record with publishers, including its Apple News+ service since 2019 and earlier deals that included AI training rights. News Corp, owner of the Wall Street Journal, already has a commercial agreement to supply news through Apple’s services, suggesting Apple can move relatively fast by building on existing relationships.
The Bear Case
Apple’s last major attempt at AI-generated news, in late 2024, published false headlines and had to be disabled almost immediately. It is a reminder that content-quality risk doesn’t disappear just because Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is now paying licensed publishers instead of scraping content. The upgraded Siri isn’t live yet and is only “expected to roll out later this year,” which means Apple is negotiating publisher deals for a product that hasn’t shipped. Some Apple News+ publisher partners have also already pulled out of that earlier program, raising questions about how durable Apple’s publisher relationships stay once initial deal terms are locked in.
Insider Monkey’s Hedge Fund Data
Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) was held by 170 hedge funds as of Q1 2026, up from 169.
Conclusion
Apple’s pay-as-you-go publisher plan is a real fix for one of Siri’s biggest weaknesses: current information. However, it also shows how much of the next Siri still depends on partners Apple doesn’t control.
While we acknowledge the risk and potential of AAPL as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and doing so within a shorter time frame. If you are looking for an AI stock that is more promising than AAPL and that has 10,000% upside potential, check out our report about this cheapest AI stock.
READ NEXT: ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM) vs. Chevron Corporation (CVX): Trump Attacks the Oil Giants for Making “Too Much Money” and The Crown Keeps Switching Hands: Apple Inc. (AAPL) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).
Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
