Upslope Capital is bullish on Bemis Company, Inc. (NYSE:BMS), a manufacturer of packaging products headquartered in Neenah, Wisconsin. In its Q4 investor letter (you can download a copy here), the investment firm discussed its investment thesis on Bemis. So, let’s take a look at Upslope Capital’s comments about Bemis.
Bemis is a leading global packaging company, focused on flexible plastic films and other forms of plastic consumer packaging. Historically, Bemis has had a reputation for having strong technology, but more ‘engineering’-focused (as opposed to shareholder-focused) leadership. The company’s underperformance recently came to a head after it repeatedly missed earnings estimates and a major activist fund (Starboard Value) became a shareholder. As a result, a unique opportunity appears to have presented itself in this business that I have followed for several years, George Livadas, the founder and portfolio manager of Upslope, said in the letter.
Here is why Livadas sees an opportunity in Bemis Company, Inc. (NYSE:BMS):
1) The company seems to be undergoing a sale process, in my view. Press reports (New York Post and others) over the past six months have suggested BMS could be sold. One report indicated interest in the company from a foreign strategic buyer; another suggested Bemis has hired an advisor to explore strategic options.
2) Bemis should be attractive to private equity buyers, based on my analysis. Given the nature of Bemis’ business – steady (if lackluster) end-markets, longer-term contracts, contractual pass-through of commodity price fluctuations – the company could support a significant amount of leverage. Its reputation for being under-managed should further add to potential private equity interest.
3) Strategic buyers may also be interested. Press reports have indicated potential interest from at least one strategic acquirer. While reports for that specific company have since been denied, the rationale remains: Bemis offers a buyer geographic and/or product (e.g. a primarily non-plastic packager) diversification. My assumption is that a strategic could pay more for BMS than a PE buyer, but that the odds of this scenario coming to fruition are lower.
4) The stock does not reflect the likelihood of a sale in a material way, based on my work. Given the above observations, my view is that the odds of Bemis being sold are greater than 50%. Based on my analysis of the stock’s performance since rumors first emerged of a potential sale, I believe the “unaffected” share price (i.e. what the stock should trade at if I am wrong about a sale) is ~$45.
5) Risks include: no deal (and, potentially incorrect conclusion/analysis regarding the unaffected price), continued top-line/volume weakness, challenging pricing environment, moderate current leverage, exposure to volatile emerging markets (e.g. Brazil), management turnover, and general uncertainty.
Robert Kneschke/Shutterstock.com
According to rumors, Bemis Company, Inc. (NYSE:BMS) is considering options to sell itself. At the end of December, The New York Post reported that British-based DS Smith showed an interest in buying Bemis. Earlier, a report from Bloomberg suggested that Australian-based packaging giant Amcor Ltd. was considering a takeover of Bemis. However, no confirmed announcement has been made so far.
Shares of Bemis are down more than 6% since the beginning of this year. The stock has dropped more than 8% during the last 12 months. Analysts, polled by FactSet, have a Hold rating on the stock, with an average price target of $48.08. The stock is currently trading at $44.69.
Bemis reported total revenues of $4.1 billion for the full-year 2017, compared to $4.0 billion for 2016. However, the company’s net income significantly dropped to $94 million for the last year, compared to $236 million for 2016, and $239 million for 2015.
In this piece, we will take a look at ten recent IPOs in micro cap stocks.
There are a variety of benefits and drawbacks to listing a firm’s equity for trading on the stock market. The single biggest benefit of the process called an IPO, is that it allows management to raise large amounts of funds and investors to potentially profit by seeing their existing stakes multiply in value. At the same time, the IPO process also brings in a variety of constraints. Publicly listed companies are subject to corporate financial reporting requirements of the jurisdictions in which their shares trade. At the same time, share prices can be a volatile affair, and while investors stand to gain significantly if their companies are well received by the market, they also risk equally massive losses should the opposite occur.
Warren Buffett never mentions this but he is one of the first hedge fund managers who unlocked the secrets of successful stock market investing. He launched his hedge fund in 1956 with $105,100 in seed capital. Back then they weren’t called hedge funds, they were called “partnerships”. Warren Buffett took 25% of all returns in excess of 6 percent.
For example S&P 500 Index returned 43.4% in 1958. If Warren Buffett’s hedge fund didn’t generate any outperformance (i.e. secretly invested like a closet index fund), Warren Buffett would have pocketed a quarter of the 37.4% excess return. That would have been 9.35% in hedge fund “fees”.
Actually Warren Buffett failed to beat the S&P 500 Index in 1958, returned only 40.9% and pocketed 8.7 percentage of it as “fees”. His investors didn’t mind that he underperformed the market in 1958 because he beat the market by a large margin in 1957. That year Buffett’s hedge fund returned 10.4% and Buffett took only 1.1 percentage points of that as “fees”. S&P 500 Index lost 10.8% in 1957, so Buffett’s investors actually thrilled to beat the market by 20.1 percentage points in 1957.
Between 1957 and 1966 Warren Buffett’s hedge fund returned 23.5% annually after deducting Warren Buffett’s 5.5 percentage point annual fees. S&P 500 Index generated an average annual compounded return of only 9.2% during the same 10-year period. An investor who invested $10,000 in Warren Buffett’s hedge fund at the beginning of 1957 saw his capital turn into $103,000 before fees and $64,100 after fees (this means Warren Buffett made more than $36,000 in fees from this investor).
As you can guess, Warren Buffett’s #1 wealth building strategy is to generate high returns in the 20% to 30% range.
We see several investors trying to strike it rich in options market by risking their entire savings. You can get rich by returning 20% per year and compounding that for several years. Warren Buffett has been investing and compounding for at least 65 years.
So, how did Warren Buffett manage to generate high returns and beat the market?
In a free sample issue of our monthly newsletter we analyzed Warren Buffett’s stock picks covering the 1999-2017 period and identified the best performing stocks in Warren Buffett’s portfolio. This is basically a recipe to generate better returns than Warren Buffett is achieving himself.
You can enter your email below to get our FREE report. In the same report you can also find a detailed bonus biotech stock pick that we expect to return more than 50% within 12-24 months. We initially share this idea in October 2018 and the stock already returned more than 150%. We still like this investment.
Free Report Reveals
Warren Buffet's Secret Recipe
Our Price: $199FREE
We may use your email to send marketing emails about our services. Click here to read our privacy policy.
