Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

TransCanada Corporation (TRP), Enbridge Inc (ENB): Pipelines Versus Railroads

Page 1 of 2

In the race to move Canadian crude, pipelines are losing.

Pipelines, built by companies such as TransCanada Corporation (NYSE:TRP) and Enbridge Inc (NYSE:ENB), once carried nearly all of the crude oil shipped through the country. This year, however, nearly 10% of Canadian crude oil production will flow, not through buried pipes, but trains.

TransCanada Corporation

But which one will win out? Let’s investigate.

The story

Rail has quietly become a popular mode of oil transportation in North America — especially as production has been overwhelming existing pipeline capacities.

With TransCanada Corporation (NYSE:TRP) Keystone XL pipeline block by environmental groups, American refiners have begun shipping crude from the Canadian tar sands via rail. In February, a record 12,970 carloads of crude were shipped across Canada, up 150% year-over-year.

This trend is benefiting Canadian railroads.

Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (NYSE:CP) increased its crude shipments 30% to 70,000 carloads in 2013. This figure is expected to double by 2015.

Canadian National Railway (NYSE:CNI) moved 100,000 b/d in 2012 accounting for 7% of revenues. Management projects its crude shipments to double by the end of 2013.

So of the two transportation options, which is the best for moving Canadian crude?

Pros and Cons

Costs

According to the U.S. State Department report, shipping crude from Canada to the Gulf coast costs $10 per barrel by pipeline and $15-$20 per barrel by rail. This is why rail never took off before. It was simply not an economical alternative compared to moving crude by pipeline.

However, that all changed when the discount between Western Canadian Select to other benchmarks exceeded $40 per barrel last winter. Suddenly shipping by rail became attractive.

Winner: Pipelines

Politics

Want to build a pipeline? Get ready for an expensive, multi-year battle against landowners and governments.

TransCanada Corporation (NYSE:TRP)’s Keysone XL proposal faces numerous challenges. If approved, the project would ship 830,000 b/d of heavy Canadian crude oil to Gulf coast refiners. While the project has been approved by the State of Nebraska, Keystone still faces numerous political obstacles and overall resistance to build.

It’s not just TransCanada Corporation (NYSE:TRP) facing construction gridlock. Enbridge Inc (NYSE:ENB)‘s proposed Northern Gateway and Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain pipelines, which would ship Canadian crude west to access Asian markets, also faces heavy resistance from environmentalists.

In contrast, extensive rail infrastructure is already in place. Producers can access any market with a offloading terminal. New terminals can be added within a few months without any political turmoil.

Winner: Rails

Convenience

Shipping by rails has several advantages for producers. Moving heavy bitumen requires less diluent and allows for higher sulfur content representing a big cost savings.

Refiners also prefer rail shipments to pipelines because they have greater certainty regarding the quality of product received as there’s less mixing of batches during transit.

Winners: Rails

Page 1 of 2
Loading...