HeartBeam, Inc. (NASDAQ:BEAT) Q3 2023 Earnings Call Transcript

HeartBeam, Inc. (NASDAQ:BEAT) Q3 2023 Earnings Call Transcript November 14, 2023

HeartBeam, Inc. misses on earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $-0.13 EPS, expectations were $-0.12.

Operator: Greetings and welcome to the HeartBeam Third Quarter 2023 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. Before we begin the formal presentation, I would like to remind everyone that the statements made on the call and webcast may include predictions, estimates and other information that may be considered forward-looking. While these forward-looking statements represent our current judgment on what the future holds, they are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our opinions only as of the date of this presentation.

Please keep in mind that we are not obligating ourselves to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements in light of new information or future events. Throughout today’s discussion, we will attend to present some important factors relating to our business that may affect our predictions. You should also — also review our most recent Form 10-K and Form 10-Q for a more complete discussion of these factors and other risks, particularly under the heading Risk Factors. A press release detailing these results crossed the wires this afternoon and is available in the Investor Relations section of our company’s website, heartbeam.com. Your host today, Branislav Vajdic, Chief Executive Officer and Founder; Rob Eno, President and Rick Brounstein, Chief Financial Officer, will present results of operations for the third quarter ended September 30 2023.

At this time, I will turn the call over to HeartBeam’s Chief Executive Officer, Branislav Vajdic. Please go ahead, Sir.

Branislav Vajdic: Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. I’m pleased to welcome you to today’s third quarter 2023 Financial Results Conference Call. On today’s call, we will be relating some very important updates about our business, our products, including our landmark, pre-reviews, study publication and a significant enhanced HeartBeam team. We continue to make steady progress towards upcoming clinical and regulatory milestones. I’d like to give you a brief overview of HeartBeam and our Technology. For those of you who just joined for the first time and as a reminder for those of you who are already familiar with us. It’s really important to understand how our VECG Technology is different from and that the more powerful the most common personal ECG Technologies that are in the marketplace today.

There are many ECG Technologies offered to consumers and patients outside of a Medical Facility. You can see a couple of examples on this slide. These are not 12-lead ECG instead they are one-lead, 3-lead or 6-lead. This is adequate for detecting many arrhythmias, but is not sufficient to detect the Heart Attack or Complex Arrhythmias. Well, there are Complex — I’m sorry, but there are many 12-lead ECG the — I’m so sorry. Basically, what I’d like to say is that a couple of ECG Technologies that are out there today that are indicated for its home use. But we do not believe that these are adequate for an easy to use for the consumer and patients to adopt them. We believe our technology has the potential to solve the problem of heart detection outside our medical institution.

The key aim of the HeartBeam technology is to quickly and accurately help clinicians identify a heart attack. HeartBeam AIMIGo is a personal portable and easy-to-use system that generates 12L ECG. The AIMIGo device, coupled with a smartphone app and cloud-based agnostic software system facilitate remote evaluation of cardiac symptoms by physicians. In addition, by collecting these signals of the heart electrical activity HeartBeam AIMIGo has the potential to provide unparalleled data for the development of AI algorithms and the creation of a rich data set for AI. We believe that AIMIGo could reduce the critical time to intervention for heart attack patients. The average patient wait three to four hours before seeking care. Future action will reduce complications and save lives.

In addition, more than 80% of the patients be chest pain, they go to the emergency room are not having a hard attack. An effective triage tool in the hands of the patient could reduce the number of unnecessary visits and thus, reduce costs to the healthcare system. The opportunity for our technology in the United States is six times larger than the Atrial fibrillation or AFib market with approximately three million AFib patients, representing a $2 billion market. At the same time, there are approximately $20 million total coronary artery disease patients, representing a $12 billion market. These are estimated market numbers for the US only. We have the opportunity to our conditions beyond arrhythmia as the AIMIGo technology will bring the power of standalone care throughout the ECG to physicians from their patients that are anywhere and at any time.

These agnostic capabilities have the potential to go beyond the 12L ECG standard of care, capable of recording and processing vector electrocardiography, VECG, signals and using powerful 3D vector-based algorithm to detect heart attacks. We have been working on our core technology, AIMIGo with a credit card core factor, but our deep product pipeline that is well-protected with our — presents us with an extraordinary opportunity, we believe to form alliances with key strategic players and multiple industrial players, including variables and ambulatory monitoring. Our risk pipeline of products includes our on-demand 12-lead extended wear patch. We recently were granted our turn US patents on this technology, which will be bringing 12-Lead technology to the established extended-wear patch segment which is estimated to reach THB 4.8 billion by 2030.

We also have extensive IP on continuous cardiac monitoring through our acquisition of LIVMOR, which developed the first FDA-cleared prescription wearable for continuous cardiac written moratory. Also in our pipeline is our integrated system, which combines continuous cardiac monitoring with our 12-lead patient carried ECG. The HeartBeam Watch which combines a 12-Lead ECG, a continuous cardiac monitor into a single form factor. Lastly, we are applying the latest in deeplearning to our cardiac signals. We look forward to updating you soon on these efforts. I would now like to turn the call over to our President, Rob Eno to provide product and business updates. Rob?

Rob Eno: Thank you, Branislav, and thanks to everyone joining us today. Turning to recent milestones. Our landmark study based on our novel VECG technology was published in JAK Advances, a journal of the American College of Cardiology. This per reviewed study demonstrated the ability of Hartbeam’s VECG technology platform to detect the presence of coronary artery occlusion. This is a very interesting study design that use balloon inflation during a stent procedure also called a percutaneous coronary intervention, or PCI, to simulate coronary occlusions. Heartbeam’s technology and a standard 12-Lead ECG were both tested for their ability to detect coronary occlusions. There are three main takeaways from the study. First, on the left, Heartbeam’s technology matched the performance of a standard in-hospital 12-lead ECG with similar accuracy.

This in itself is important as Heartbeam’s technology is intended to be used by patients outside of a healthcare institution. Second, the study showed that both for Heartbeam’s technology and a standard 12-lead ECG when assessing chest pain, performance was much better when the reading was accompanied by a baseline ECG taken before the event. The area under the curve, or AUC, a measure of accuracy was 0.95 for greater when including both the symptomatic and baseline recordings. The AUC when only the symptomatic was included was much lower around 0.7. In other words, assessing payers of ECGs or VECGs, the patient’s baseline plus one taken during an event can increase accuracy by more than 30%. 12 plus 12 is better than just a 12-lead ECG. And this is particularly important because Heartbeam’s technology by design always includes the patients asymptomatic baseline taken when he or she is onboarded.

And the final takeaway is that in practice, the Heartbeam technology could have a dramatic improvement in accuracy over a 12-lead ECG taken in an emergency room. While the heart beam technology will always have a patient’s asymptomatic VECG and we’ll be able to assess the pairs of readings. When a patients ECG is assessed in an emergency room, there’s often no baseline. So our Heartbeam’s 12 plus 12 reading could be almost 40% more accurate than a single 12-Lead ECG recording in the emergency room with the AUC increasing from 0.68 to 0.95. So when all this study demonstrates the potential that the AIMIGo system holds, and we’ll be conducting additional studies focused on our 12-Lead synthesis and on the performance of the system as a whole.

We believe these studies will be key to driving clinical and patient adoption. During the quarter, we were privileged to add multiple new respected industry executives and physicians to our leadership team, Board of Directors and Scientific Advisory Board. We strengthened our Board of Directors with the appointment of Dr. Michael R. Jaff, Chief Medical Officer and Vice President of Clinical Affairs, Technology and Innovation of the Peripheral Interventions division at Boston Scientific. Dr. Jaff is a renowned vascular physician and researcher, bringing a wealth of clinical and industry experience to the Board. This follows the recent additions of Ken Nelson and Mark Strome. We also made three key hires to our senior management team, Richa Gujarati joined HeartBeam as Senior Vice President of Product.

Richa has over 13 years of experience collecting market-level insights and translating them into business needs for companies ranging from St. Jude and iRhythm to Apple. Her deep expertise in go-to-market strategies for health sensing technologies will be instrumental as we ready the HeartBeam AIMIGo system for market release. Debbie Castillo joined HeartBeam as Vice President of Regulatory Affairs. Debbie is an experienced Biomedical Engineer with extensive knowledge of FDA, EU and Health Canada regulations. She has experience as well and — she has industry experience as well in various positions with the FDA. She is responsible for leading our regulatory affairs function and overseeing the company’s interactions with regulatory agencies worldwide.

And finally, we welcomed Pooja Chatterjee, as Vice President Clinical. She brings over 15 years of extensive clinical leadership experience in the medical device industry, most recently at Abbott, and will oversee our clinical studies and related efforts. We recently added five distinguished physicians to our Scientific Advisory Board. This group brings expertise in interventional cardiology, electrophysiology, clinical research and new technologies. The new members are Charles L. Brown III, Tony Das, Robert Harrington, Campbell Rogers and Niraj Varma. They joined our Chief Medical Officer, Peter Fitzgerald, in the previously announced Chair of the Scientific Advisory Board, Michael Gibson. I encourage you to read our press release of the appointments to get a sense of the wealth of experience at favoring.

We continue to make steady progress toward our key product milestones, as previously discussed, we will have two 510(k) submissions to the FDA. The first, which we call version 1 is for clearance of the HeartBeam AIMIGo VECG device. This application, which was submitted to the FDA in May is for the hardware. Clearance is a 3-Lead VECG collection device. This submission is progressing well. We’ve received questions from FDA and have submitted our responses. The second submission planned for after we receive the clearance for version 1 is for the software, including the algorithms that generate a synthesized 12-Lead ECG for physician review. On this application, which we call version 2, we have held a successful pre-submission meeting with the FDA.

This meeting focused on the design of the clinical study that will demonstrate the performance of our synthesized 12-Lead ECG in relation to a standard 12-lead ECC. We’re encouraged by our interactions with FDA, and we continue to expect the product will be ready for limited market release during the second half of 2024. I’ll now turn the call over to Rick Brounstein, Chief Financial Officer, to discuss operational updates and financials.

Rick Brounstein : Thank you, Rob. Turning to our financials. I will now give a brief overview of our financial results. A full breakdown is available in our regulatory filings and in the press release that crossed the wire after market closed today. General and administrative expenses for the third quarter of 2023 were $2.1 million compared to $2 million for the third quarter of 2022. Although, overall G&A expense is flat, cash spending is actually down in looking at 2023 compared to 2022. In 2022, we were invested in the commercial team and due to our change in the near-term focus in early ’23, we’re not currently emphasizing commercial activities. Reduced sales and marketing expense was offset by increased noncash stock-based compensation of about $0.4 million, resulting primarily from the issuance of employee stock options following the May 2023 financings.

Research and development expenses for the third quarter of 2023 were $1.6 million, approximately the same level of expense as compared to the third quarter of 2022. In addition to the current development focus on HeartBeam AIMIGo, in both periods, we also invested in research costs in support of the future product pipeline coming from our patented VECG platform technology, which is the basis for our patent portfolio of 11 issued patents. With current interest rates in the short-term markets around 5%, we earned $267,000 in interest income in the third quarter of 2023 compared to $28,000 in the third quarter last year. Net loss for the third quarter of 2023 was $3.5 million compared to a net loss of $3.6 million for the third quarter of 2022.

We ended the third quarter of 2023 ahead of plan with $19.2 million in cash and cash equivalents compared to $3.6 million as of December 31 last year. As mentioned in May, we closed the common stock financing with gross proceeds of $26.5 million. The cash is planned to last in early 2025, while we expect to receive FDA clearance or HeartBeam AIMIGo version 2, which is our commercial product in the second half of 2024. We remain confident that we have sufficient funds to deliver on these important milestones and to get prepared to move into the commercialization phase of HeartBeam AIMIGo. Hospital of importance in the May 23 financings is the fact that they were common stock only financings. They did not include any warrants and our balance sheet as a result, has a very simple and straightforward capital structure with approximately 26 million shares outstanding now.

Finally, I would also like to share the results of our recent annual meeting of shareholders at the event, all proposals passed which included adding 4 million authorized shares to the 2022 equity incentive plan. I’ll now turn the call back over to Branislav for closing thoughts.

Branislav Vajdic: Thank you, Rick. Let me just say that we remain incredibly optimistic for the future of HeartBeam. Now, I would like to summarize the recent efforts in the following categories. Continued validation and company momentum, progress towards key milestones and financial soundness. First, we had several announcements that demonstrated external validation of the technology and continued momentum of the company. Our landmark clinical study was published in General American College of Cardiology Advances. We made several key additions to our Board of Directors, our Senior Management team and our Scientific Advisory Board. And the U.S. passenger trademark buckets granted the third patent on 12-lead extended wear patch.

Our 11 patent overall. Next, as Rob has summarized. We have made steady progress toward our key milestones, with productive discussions with FDA on our initial application, our AIMIGo hardware. Equally importantly, we had a successful pre-submission meeting with the FDA on our second application, which will be on the algorithm that synthesizes the 12-Lead ECG from our AIMIGo device. Our expectation is for a limited launch in the second half of 2024 remains unchanged. We have a strong cash position. We ended the quarter with significant cash position of $19.2 million well ahead of the plan. And this $19.2 million in cash includes also cash equivalents and short-term investments providing the runway very importantly to early 2025. I would like to close by reiterating that we have — have positive interactions with the FDA in the past quarter, and we remain on track for our key product milestones.

I look forward to providing our shareholders with further updates in the near term. I thank you all for attending. And now the HeartBeam team would like to answer your questions. Operator?

See also Dividend Kings Ranked By Yield: Top 25 and 12 Tech Stocks with Low PE Ratios.

Q&A Session

Operator: Thank you, sir. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, we will be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Ben Haynor of Alliance Global Markets. Please go ahead.

Ben Haynor: Good afternoon, gentlemen. Thanks for taking the questions. First off for me, congrats on all the progress. Just curious on the interactions with the FDA, the questions on the first submission, I mean, it sounds like it’s been a productive dialogue, but just knowing that you’ve answered the questions. I presume there aren’t any things that look like showstoppers in there? Is that a fair assumption?

Branislav Vajdic: Yes. We definitely had a number of interactions now with the FDA on our first submission, that’s under consideration as well as on our tool future submission, which was subject of our pre-submission meeting with the FDA. Without going into details, we definitely tackled the issues that FDA basically brought up. But really don’t have anything on our horizon that would be serious concern or as you turn the show stopper. So all-in-all, it’s quite a bit a work, no question about that, but there are no points that would — in our judgment be negative nature and so not being able to achieve our goal.

Ben Haynor: Okay. Great. That’s definitely helpful and sounds positive. And then just on the pre-sub meeting, any takeaways that you can potentially share on the study design? I mean, is it bigger than a bread box? I mean, is it something that you can do in animals? Is it in humans? Is it dozens? Is it hundreds? Is it thousands? What’s kind of — is there any sort of guide rails you can give us on what that might look like?

Branislav Vajdic: Yes. Indeed, that was a significant topic in our pre-sub meeting with the FDA, the clinical studies, the nature of the endpoints. And as far as, of course, it’s going to be in humans, it’s going to be a fairly simple study for what we are proposing now and what FDA appears to be basically positive on in terms of how the study will be designed and executed. And in terms of cost and the number of subjects, it’s always the range that we expected, and it is not high. So all-in-all on the study, everything is looking as we have envisioned so far.

Ben Haynor: Okay. So it sounds like everything is going according to plan or as you put it earlier, well ahead of plan on the cash utilization. And then just lastly for me and then I’ll jump back in queue. You know — a big deal with the JAK publication. Can you share any reaction that you’ve gotten from folks on that? I know there was the editorial that came away positive that was published but just any kind of color that you have from the other folks that are side and are entering by findings?

Branislav Vajdic: Rob, would you please answer?

Rob Eno: Yes. Sure. Yes. No — good question. The feedback has been really positive. I think as I highlighted, I think a lot of the physicians we spoke to were intrigued by the study design using the balloon inflation as a really an interesting way to look at this problem. And I think the themes really resonated. The theme that this is a good way to show kind of apples-to-apples that were equivalent to a standard 12 Lead, even though we’re outside the hospital. And then this insight, which I think was new to a lot of people of the importance of the baseline, especially when assessing potential heart attack, a potential occlusion and how much that adds to the accuracy, both for a 12 Lead and for ours. So I think, as I tried to allude to, the feedback we’re getting is that it’s really interesting when you put those two together because not everybody who goes to the emergency room gets — they have a baseline readily accessible that actually our baseline being accessible provides a potential advantage.

So I think the physicians we talked to were very excited about it and see it as a really great first step to prove the feasibility of the study and looking forward to continue to work with us and provide more data.

Ben Haynor: Okay. Great. That’s helpful. Thanks for taking the questions, guys.

Branislav Vajdic: Thank you

Operator: Thank you very much. [Operator Instructions] We have no further questions on the conference call at the moment. And I would like to take the webcast questions.

Unidentified Company Representative: The first webcast question asks, if you have a 12-week ECG with the patient at home, who will read or interpret the heart attack, the patient, AI or a cardiologist, if the latter how will they get the ECG?

Rob Eno: Yes, I can take this one as well. Yes, it’s a great question, and it’s really — it’s an important thing. We believe it’s crucial for the ECG to be evaluated by a physician. We don’t want to be in a position that heart beams algorithm is saying whether or not you — especially in the case of a [Technical Difficulty] will be set up. The idea is the patient will perform the use of AIMIGo device at home or with the device and the app. That gets sent up to the cloud where the signals are processed, chaps for quality, and then the 12 lead is synthesized. And then that is sent to the reader service, which then analyzes it. And then the physician in that reader service will reply to the patient, giving them the interpretation and can even initiate a telehealth visit or consultation if needed.

So we think it’s important, especially when we’re dealing with things like potential heart attacks that there’s a physician in the loop and are building the workflow to incorporate that.

Unidentified Company Representative: Our next question asks, you mentioned the application of deep learning to your system. Do you have more details on that effort?