Florida-based Polen Capital sees value in Celgene Corporation (NASDAQ:CELG), which struggled during the past year. The biotechnology company dropped nearly 10% in 2017.Polen Capital, however, is still confident about Celgene, and in its Q4 investor letter (a copy of which can be downloaded here), the investment firm noted that it sees “ample opportunities” for the company to grow. A similar confidence was expressed lately by another investment firm Wedgewood Partners, which called the biotechnology company a compelling growth opportunity in its Q4 investor letter. In this article, we’re going to take a look at Polen Capital’s investment thesis on Celgene.
Here is what Polen Capital said about Celgene:
Our biotech holdings were poor performers in 2017, especially late in the year. Celgene, in particular, has been impacted by two issues. First, the company announced that one of its promising pipeline candidates for use in Crohn’s disease called mongersen failed in phase III clinical trials. Then a few weeks later, it announced that one of its newer, faster growing drugs, Otezla, which is used for psoriasis, would grow significantly slower over the next few years due to pricing pressure from payors. We had ascribed no value to mongersen because we felt that it had a decent chance of failure, but the lower Otezla guidance was disappointing even though the economic impact to Celgene is actually quite small.
Celgene has been a very stable growth company for years on the back of its wildly successful drug, Revlimid, which has become the de facto standard treatment for multiple myeloma. Revlimid today is still growing at a 15%+ rate and will likely continue until the Revlimid patents begin to expire around 2025. It is important, however, that Celgene can replace Revlimid revenues with other therapies by that time. Celgene’s management has for years been preparing for this outcome with a novel approach to research and development.
Instead of trying to only develop drugs in its own labs, it has partnered with dozens of small biotech companies with potentially game-changing therapies. In fact, the company has roughly 100 potential therapies in various stages of clinical development. This “shots on goal” approach to R&D is not without risk, though, as many of these drugs are novel innovations that have never been tried before. Celgene only needs a relatively small number of these pipeline opportunities to be successful to continue to grow far into the future, but with novel science there is risk of course. Mongersen is an example of a high-risk, high-reward opportunity that did not work out. Even some of the company’s established therapies such as Revlimid have failed to show that they work in new areas such as follicular lymphoma.
Overall, the failure of some product candidates and pricing pressure on Otezla has increased the risk to Celgene’s growth post-2025, but not much before then. We acknowledge this risk and feel that the risk/reward is more balanced now than before when we felt a bit more confident in the growth profile post-Revlimid patent life. We still see ample opportunities for Celgene to grow as other potentially large candidates progress through clinical trials, though, including a few large opportunities in oncology and immunology. Celgene also has a strong balance sheet. With soon-to-be repatriated cash and prodigious cash flow, the company will also be in a strong position to pursue value-creating business development. With the risk/reward balanced, we have not added to or reduced our position even though the valuation has become quite attractive. At the current price, we feel there is almost no value being ascribed to the company’s pipeline.
Pressmaster/Shutterstock.com
Celgene Corporation (NASDAQ:CELG) is developing innovative therapies for the treatment of cancer and immune-inflammatory related diseases. The company’s portfolio include REVLIMID, VIDAZA, THALOMID, POMALYST/IMNOVID, ABRAXANE, OTEZLA, ISTODAX and IDHIFA.
Celgene is a popular company among hedge funds tracked by Insider Monkey. There were 63 funds in our database with bullish positions in the biotechnology firm. Orbimed Advisors, Birchview Capital, and Selkirk Management allocated significant amounts of their AUM to Celgene Corporation at the end of Q3.
Meanwhile, Celgene agreed to acquire Impact Biomedicines and Juno Therapeutics in two separate deals announced this month. The biotechnology company is buying Impact Biomedicines for $7 billion and Juno Therapeutics for $9 billion. Impact Biomedicines is working on a treatment for myelofibrosis, a type of blood cancer. Meanwhile, Juno is a clinical-stage cell immunotherapy company that is developing a pipeline of cancer immunotherapy drugs.
Warren Buffett never mentions this but he is one of the first hedge fund managers who unlocked the secrets of successful stock market investing. He launched his hedge fund in 1956 with $105,100 in seed capital. Back then they weren’t called hedge funds, they were called “partnerships”. Warren Buffett took 25% of all returns in excess of 6 percent.
For example S&P 500 Index returned 43.4% in 1958. If Warren Buffett’s hedge fund didn’t generate any outperformance (i.e. secretly invested like a closet index fund), Warren Buffett would have pocketed a quarter of the 37.4% excess return. That would have been 9.35% in hedge fund “fees”.
Actually Warren Buffett failed to beat the S&P 500 Index in 1958, returned only 40.9% and pocketed 8.7 percentage of it as “fees”. His investors didn’t mind that he underperformed the market in 1958 because he beat the market by a large margin in 1957. That year Buffett’s hedge fund returned 10.4% and Buffett took only 1.1 percentage points of that as “fees”. S&P 500 Index lost 10.8% in 1957, so Buffett’s investors actually thrilled to beat the market by 20.1 percentage points in 1957.
Between 1957 and 1966 Warren Buffett’s hedge fund returned 23.5% annually after deducting Warren Buffett’s 5.5 percentage point annual fees. S&P 500 Index generated an average annual compounded return of only 9.2% during the same 10-year period. An investor who invested $10,000 in Warren Buffett’s hedge fund at the beginning of 1957 saw his capital turn into $103,000 before fees and $64,100 after fees (this means Warren Buffett made more than $36,000 in fees from this investor).
As you can guess, Warren Buffett’s #1 wealth building strategy is to generate high returns in the 20% to 30% range.
We see several investors trying to strike it rich in options market by risking their entire savings. You can get rich by returning 20% per year and compounding that for several years. Warren Buffett has been investing and compounding for at least 65 years.
So, how did Warren Buffett manage to generate high returns and beat the market?
In a free sample issue of our monthly newsletter we analyzed Warren Buffett’s stock picks covering the 1999-2017 period and identified the best performing stocks in Warren Buffett’s portfolio. This is basically a recipe to generate better returns than Warren Buffett is achieving himself.
You can enter your email below to get our FREE report. In the same report you can also find a detailed bonus biotech stock pick that we expect to return more than 50% within 12-24 months. We initially share this idea in October 2018 and the stock already returned more than 150%. We still like this investment.
Free Report Reveals
Warren Buffet's Secret Recipe
Our Price: $199FREE
We may use your email to send marketing emails about our services. Click here to read our privacy policy.