Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Avenir Corporation’s 2019 Midyear Review

Washington-based investment management firm Avenir Corporation released its 2019 Midyear Review – a copy of which can be downloaded below. The company is composed of principal managers who have over 5 decades of combined investment management experience. The team provides services such as idea generation, client asset investment, and research in order to achieve its goals.

Avenir Corporation is being led by two portfolio managers – Peter C. Keefe and James H. Rooney. Before he started managing client portfolios at Avenir in 1991, Keefe worked as Director of Research at Johnston, Lemon & Company. This CFA Charterholder holds a bachelor’s degree from Washington & Lee University and is a member of the CFA Society of Washington, D.C. On the other hand, Rooney started working for Avenir in 1998. Before joining the firm, he worked at Deloitte & Touche, LLP, Sonat, Inc., Columbia Energy Group, and J. & W. Seligman & Co. He holds a bachelor’s degree from Duke University and a master’s degree from the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University. A CFA Charterholder, Rooney is also a member of the CFA Society of Washington, D.C.

In Avenir’s Midyear Review published in August 2019, Keefe and Rooney talked about the rise of equity prices in the first 7 months of this year and the significant bout of volatility in August caused by the trade war with China, fears of recession, and controversial presidential tweets. They added that stock indices remain in the mid-teens year-to-date.

“Benefitting from rising earnings, declining interest rates and low inflation, equity prices rose sharply in the first seven months of 2019 before experiencing a significant bout of volatility in August, induced by our trade war with China and fears of recession, and compounded by controversial presidential tweets. Stock indices remain up in the mid-teens year-to-date as of this writing.

A bigger story that doesn’t get the same headlines as the gyrating Dow Jones Industrial Average or provocative tweets is the unheard-of behavior in the credit markets, where interest rates have collapsed to record lows around the globe. Bloomberg reports that as of August 20th, more than $16.4 trillion of global debt, about a quarter of all global debt outstanding, traded at a negative yield. The negative yielding debt is mostly governmental but includes some corporate bonds. All German and Dutch government bonds have negative yields. French and Japanese government yields are all negative except for their 30-year bonds but the champion issuer is Switzerland, which has a negative yield even on its 50-year maturity. In Denmark, homeowners can obtain mortgages with negative interest rates, where the bank pays the borrowing homeowner. U.S. Treasury yields, which currently peak out at a little over 2%, are disproportionately high by comparison. Left rubbing their eyes are those who remember former Federal Reserve Board Chairman Paul Volcker’s inflation-killing federal funds rate which peaked at 20% in June of 1981. Today’s fed funds target rate is 2.00-2.25%, after 8 increases from the lows of 2015 and one modest quarter-point decrease this July. The highly-respected Grant’s Interest Rate Observer reports that interest rates for the highest quality government issuers haven’t been this low since the Middle Ages.

Negative interest rates are counterintuitive. They fly in the face of what most of us have taken as gospel for years, which is that uncontrolled government deficit spending, concomitant borrowing, and money printing (such as that which occurred in the wake of the Global Financial Crisis) would result in surging inflation and interest rates. Today’s United States government debt of $22 trillion is roughly double the amount outstanding ten years ago. This increase was achieved during the longest U.S. economic expansion on record. Classical Keynesian economic theory (as well as kitchen table economics) argue for paying down debt during periods of prosperity in order to mitigate inflationary pressures and rising interest rates, but the opposite has occurred.

So much for classical economics, but the current low interest rate environment is important because interest rates act as the “North Star” for stocks. The value of any financial asset is essentially based on a comparison to the “riskless rate of return” obtainable from U.S. Treasury securities, generally considered the safest investments in the world. For instance, an investor who can get only 1.5% from a 10-year US government bond, without fear of default, might find the stock market’s 9-10% hundred-year average rate of return an appealing alternative. In the 90 years between 1928 and 2018, stocks returned almost 4.7% above the average 10-year U.S. Treasury note, a figure often referred to as the “risk premium,” or the additional return required to induce an investor to take the risks of equity ownership, which include market volatility, exposure to a fluctuating economy, company-specific and industry problems, managerial missteps, and Wall Street’s fickleness, among many others. Adding that 4.7% risk premium to the August 20th 10-year yield of 1.5% translates into a required return of 6.2%. A required return of 6.2% implies a market price-to-earnings ratio of roughly 16, which is about the level at which the market trades today. In other words, if the credit markets currently have it right, then stocks are not overvalued

Other credit market oddities include government bonds issued by countries far less creditworthy than the U.S. but which carry yields considerably lower than the corresponding U.S. Treasury bond. For example, Spanish and Italian 10-year government bonds yield 0.1% and 1.4% respectively, compared to 1.5% in the U.S. This is analogous to student loan-saddled graduates on their first job getting a lower mortgage rate than their higherearning parents. We are also at a loss to explain the difference in yields between certain other countries. The Spanish and Italian yields are an example. Both are denominated in Euros and, as the Greek debt crisis proved, are effectively equally creditworthy as they are essentially backed by the European Central Bank.

As long term, fundamental investors, we do not have a defined view on the near-term direction of interest rates, or even the stock market, and instead focus on the knowable, which is the state of the businesses we choose to own. For more than a generation, it has been a fool’s errand to call the bottom in interest rates. Yields have been dropping consistently since 1981, meaning that the bull market in bonds is in its 38th year. We are acutely aware that distortions in the credit markets can get magnified in the stock market, a linkage that was at the core of the 2007-2008 stock market meltdown. We are also aware that an economy set up to operate on essentially free money is especially vulnerable to unpredictable interest rate and inflation shocks.

We deal with this uncertainty by investing in a handful of simple, powerful business models that do not require us to risk a bet on interest rates or inflation. These are honestly managed businesses whose models we can reasonably assume will remain intact for at least 5-10 years while compounding our capital at significantly above-average rates. We see no reason to believe that stock prices will not continue to compound at their historic average of 9-10% per year, interrupted occasionally by major deviations both up and down (such as this year’s 20% year-to-date market return). That said, we are comfortable holding an amount of cash that would permit us to establish new positions and build on others to the extent they become bargains.”

They ended the review with this:

“We have enjoyed a decade of rising stock prices in the wake of the Global Financial Crisis. Rising corporate earnings have benefitted from the tailwind of declining interest rates, which have also boosted the multiple paid for those earnings. Our portfolio is not “cheap” by historical standards, but our businesses and managers generally find a way to compound per share value in nearly every environment. They have earned our trust. “

You can download a copy of Avenir Corporation’s 2019 Midyear Review here:

Avenir Corporation’s 2019 Midyear Review

You can also see the list of our 2019 Q2 investor letters and download them on this page.

DOWNLOAD FREE REPORT: Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks

Let Warren Buffett, George Soros, Steve Cohen, and Daniel Loeb WORK FOR YOU.

If you want to beat the low cost index funds by 19 percentage points per year, look no further than our monthly newsletter.In this free report you can find an in-depth analysis of the performance of Warren Buffett's entire historical stock picks. We uncovered Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks and a way to for Buffett to improve his returns by more than 4 percentage points per year.

Bonus Biotech Stock Pick: You can also find a detailed bonus biotech stock pick that we expect to return more than 50% within 12 months.
Subscribe me to Insider Monkey's Free Daily Newsletter
This is a FREE report from Insider Monkey. Credit Card is NOT required.