Analysts on Wall Street Lower Ratings for These 10 Stocks

Published February 7, 2024 at 10:04 am EST Updated September 7, 2026 at 12:16 pm EDT

In this article, we will discuss the 10 stocks recently downgraded by analysts.

Global financial markets experienced a moment of pause on February 6 as traders awaited further guidance from central bank officials, particularly from the Federal Reserve. The bond market, in particular, showed signs of stabilization following a significant sell-off spanning two days, which was the most pronounced in months. Meanwhile, the direction of stocks remained uncertain amid a mixed bag of corporate earnings reports. In the bond market, there was a modest recovery as ten-year Treasury yields, which had surged approximately 28 basis points over the preceding two sessions, registered minor fluctuations. S&P 500 futures indicated a slight decline, while European stocks saw marginal gains. Notably, BP Plc enjoyed a notable surge of nearly 7% after unveiling plans to initiate a substantial buyback program, amounting to $3.5 billion in the first half of the year. However, the positive momentum from BP’s announcement was offset by disappointing earnings results from UBS Group AG, leading to a retreat in its stock price. This contrast in performance underscores the delicate balance in the current market environment, where investors are weighing various factors, including corporate performance, central bank policies, and geopolitical developments, to determine their next moves.

Chinese stocks rallied sharply on Tuesday, marking their most significant single-day surge in two years, buoyed by signals of increased government support, reported Reuters. The Shanghai Composite index rose 3.2%, its largest daily gain since March 2022, with trade volume hitting its highest level in months. The blue-chip CSI 300 index also climbed 3.5%, while the small-cap index saw its most substantial rise since 2008. The rebound comes after the indexes hit five-year lows recently due to concerns about the economy and lack of policy stimulus. Positive news, including reports of President Xi Jinping’s engagement with financial regulators and further restrictions on short selling, contributed to the market’s renewed optimism. In Hong Kong, the Hang Seng index surged 4%, with technology stocks leading the gains. While state intervention has bolstered market sentiment in the short term, underlying economic challenges like weak demand and deflationary pressures remain. The market’s reaction underscores the need for sustained efforts to address these structural issues for long-term stability and growth. From the Oil market front, oil prices rose as concerns about escalating tensions in the Middle East offset the impact of hawkish remarks from the Federal Reserve. Brent crude remained above $78 per barrel following a rebound from a recent low. The United States indicated plans for further military action against Iranian forces and their allies in the region, while Yemen’s Houthi rebels reported another attack on commercial vessels in the Red Sea. These geopolitical developments countered initial market pessimism earlier in the week, as investors downplayed the likelihood of a Fed rate cut in March, keeping oil prices within a narrow range of around $10 throughout the year so far.

In financial markets, notable equities such as Charter Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ:CHTR) and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ:GFS) have received downgrades from analysts among many other companies. To access a comprehensive list of stocks that have recently undergone downgrades by financial analysts, kindly refer to the complete article.

10. Markel Group Inc. (NYSE:MKL)

Price Reaction after the Downgrade: +6.05 (+0.43%)

On February 5, Jefferies analyst Andrew Andersen revised his recommendation for Markel Group Inc. (NYSE:MKL) from Buy to Hold and adjusted the price target from $1,680 to $1,500. Despite the downgrade, the stock experienced a marginal increase of 0.43% in its market price by the closing bell, reaching $1,418.80. According to Andersen, Markel Group Inc. is facing heightened pressure on its commercial liability reserves, which is expected to persist in the foreseeable future. This pressure is attributed to sustained levels of social and financial inflation, which are impacting the company’s loss cost trends. Additionally, the analyst expressed concerns regarding Markel Group Inc. heavy reliance on favorable reserve offsets, particularly from recent accident years, international operations, and short-tail lines, to counterbalance adverse trends in its U.S. long-tail business. The decision to downgrade Markel Group Inc. reflects Jefferies’ apprehension about the company’s ability to mitigate the challenges posed by the current operating environment effectively. Despite the company’s strong fundamentals and past performance, the analyst believes that the prevailing market conditions warrant a more cautious stance. The revised price target of $1,500 indicates a tempered outlook for Markel Group Inc. valuation, aligning with the concerns raised regarding its reserve pressures and loss cost trends. Overall, Jefferies’ downgrade underscores the importance of closely monitoring the evolving dynamics within the insurance industry, particularly concerning reserve management and the impact of inflationary pressures.

Giverny Capital Asset Management stated the following regarding Markel Group Inc. in its fourth quarter 2023 investor letter:

“In the fourth quarter, we sold Markel Group Inc. (NYSE:MKL), the Richmond-based insurer. For some years now, Markel has tried to mimic Berkshire Hathaway by using profit generated in its core insurance business to buy whole companies. While this has been a compelling model for Berkshire, Markel has not been able to convince high-quality companies to sell for attractive prices to the same degree as Berkshire.

Meanwhile, in its insurance operations, Markel has an elevated expense structure – it spends about 33 cents of every dollar collected in premiums on its own overhead. Its leanest competitor spends 21 cents of every premium dollar on overhead. Markel’s cost structure stems from an unwieldy technology stack that would be very expensive to upgrade. I have great respect for Markel, but the combination of middling investments and a challenging expense structure caused me to believe I could find better value elsewhere.

Selling SS&C and Markel, which were each about 4% of the portfolio, was not easy for me. Both businesses trade for reasonable prices and have good competitive positions. They have strong CEOs who have been in the job for many years. CEO Bill Stone founded SS&C and is a billionaire thanks to his own decisions. Tom Gayner at Markel is a well-regarded stock market investor and a much-admired leader.”

09. The TJX Companies, Inc. (NYSE:TJX)

Price Reaction after the Downgrade: -0.86 (-0.88%)

On February 5, Redburn Atlantic adjusted its rating for The TJX Companies, Inc. (NYSE:TJX) from Buy to Neutral, maintaining the price target at $100. Despite the downgrade, The TJX Companies, Inc. experienced a slight decline of 0.88% in its market price by the closing bell, settling at $96.65. According to the analyst, TJX operates in the off-price retail industry, which continues to gain market share from traditional retail segments. While acknowledging The TJX Companies, Inc. position as a high-quality player in this segment, Redburn Atlantic expressed reservations regarding the company’s current consensus expectations. The firm believes that these expectations are overly optimistic, especially considering The TJX Companies, Inc. strong operational performance compared to its peers. Redburn Atlantic cited concerns about the potential for a moderation in management’s outlook, which could limit the stock’s upside potential in the short term. Despite TJX’s strong fundamentals and its success in the off-price retail market, the analyst believes that a more tempered approach to expectations is warranted given the prevailing market conditions. The decision to downgrade The TJX Companies, Inc. reflects Redburn Atlantic’s caution about the company’s near-term outlook and its ability to sustain its current level of outperformance. While the firm remains positive about The TJX Companies, Inc. long-term prospects within the off-price retail sector, it advises investors to adjust their expectations accordingly to reflect a more realistic assessment of the company’s performance potential in the coming quarters.

ClearBridge Multi Cap Growth Strategy made the following comment about The TJX Companies, Inc. in its Q2 2023 investor letter:

“Top heavy leadership has overshadowed weakness across much of the equity market. We took advantage of the narrow breadth in the second quarter to increase our exposure to the consumer discretionary sector with two purchases that further enhance portfolio diversification and should help support consistent performance through a full cycle.

The TJX Companies, Inc. (NYSE:TJX) is the leading off-price apparel and home furnishings retailer known for its TJ Maxx, Marshalls and HomeGoods brands, with 4,800 global locations. We see TJX as a differentiated retailer offering shoppers a combination of value and convenience with continued share gain opportunity against large addressable U.S. markets for apparel and home decor. We also see room for TJX to modestly expand margins on the back of sales leverage and as freight, shrink and wage pressures ease. While TJX is not immune to macro risks, we see the company as relatively well-positioned even in the event of an economic deterioration as benefits from better inventory availability and consumer trade-down accrue.”

08. Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (NYSE:SIX)

Price Reaction after the Downgrade: -0.43 (-1.66%)

On February 5, B.Riley analyst Eric Wold revised his rating for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (NYSE:SIX) from Buy to Neutral, while maintaining a price target of $30.00. Following the downgrade, Six Flags experienced a decline of 1.66% in its market price by the closing bell, settling at $25.43. The amusement park industry, represented by Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, faced regulatory uncertainties related to the proposed merger with Cedar Fair. Eric Wold highlighted ongoing concerns regarding the regulatory approval process for the merger as a key factor behind the downgrade. Wold emphasized the potential risks associated with the merger and its impact on Six Flags Entertainment Corporation future prospects. While acknowledging the company’s strengths and previous recommendation to buy its stock, the analyst reassessed the situation in light of the regulatory challenges posed by the merger. Despite maintaining a positive outlook on Six Flags Entertainment Corporation fundamentals and its position in the amusement park industry, Wold believes that the uncertainties surrounding the merger warrant a more cautious approach. As a result, he downgraded the stock from Buy to Neutral, advising investors to carefully monitor developments related to the merger and its regulatory approval process.

07. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (NASDAQ:TTWO)

Price Reaction after the Downgrade: -2.99 (-1.79%)

On February 5, MoffettNathanson analyst Clay Griffin adjusted his rating for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (NASDAQ:TTWO) from Buy to Neutral, while maintaining a price target of $167.00. Following the downgrade, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. experienced a decline of 1.79% in its market price by the closing bell, settling at $164.01. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. operates in the video game industry, where it is renowned for its innovative gaming offerings and successful franchises. However, Griffin’s downgrade reflects a reassessment of the company’s future prospects and market conditions. Griffin highlighted factors such as evolving industry dynamics, competitive pressures, and potential regulatory changes as reasons behind the downgrade. While acknowledging Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. strengths and previous recommendation to buy its stock, the analyst believes that a Neutral rating is more appropriate given the current market landscape. The decision to downgrade Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. stems from a thorough evaluation of various factors impacting the company’s performance and outlook. Griffin emphasized the importance of maintaining a balanced perspective on the stock, considering both its strengths and challenges in the dynamic gaming industry.

06. Portland General Electric Company (NYSE:POR)

Price Reaction after the Downgrade: -1.53 (-3.73%)

On February 5, BofA Securities analyst Julien Dumoulin-Smith revised his rating for Portland General Electric Company (NYSE:POR) from Buy to Neutral, while adjusting the price target to $43.00, down from $55.00. Following the downgrade, Portland General Electric’s stock experienced a decline of 3.73% in its market price by the closing bell, settling at $39.55. Portland General Electric Company operates in the utility industry, providing electricity services to customers in Oregon. However, Dumoulin-Smith’s downgrade reflects a reassessment of the company’s financial outlook and market performance. BofA’s Julien Dumoulin-Smith noted Portland General Electric Company progress in managing earnings volatility from power price fluctuations but warned of added uncertainty due to uncontrollable scarcity events. To sustain growth, Dumoulin-Smith suggested an annual equity issuance of around $250 million, representing 2%-3% of average volume and 6% of market cap. He highlighted investor concerns about wildfire risk, which contribute to a discount in POR’s valuation, especially among utility-focused and generalist investors. These adjustments led BofA Securities to revise its recommendation on Portland General Electric Company from Buy to Neutral. The decision to downgrade Portland General Electric Company was based on a comprehensive analysis of the company’s financial metrics, industry dynamics, and regulatory environment. Dumoulin-Smith emphasized the importance of aligning the investment recommendation with the latest market conditions and outlook for the utility sector. Investors should consider the implications of the downgrade, as it reflects the evolving landscape in the utility industry and the potential impact on Portland General Electric Company financial performance and stock valuation.

05. BigCommerce Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:BIGC)

Price Reaction after the Downgrade: -0.37 (-4.43%)

On February 5, Goldman Sachs analyst Gabriela Borges revised the rating of BigCommerce Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:BIGC) from Buy to Neutral, expressing concerns about the company’s efforts to capture market share in the mid-market segment. The downgrade resulted in a 4.43% decline in the stock’s closing price, settling at $7.98. Borges emphasized the potential challenges BigCommerce Holdings, Inc. may face as it strives to expand its presence in this particular market niche. Borges pointed out that while BigCommerce Holdings, Inc. has shown promise, particularly in the mid-market sector, there are uncertainties ahead that warrant a more cautious stance. The analyst highlighted various factors contributing to this decision, including competitive pressures, shifting consumer preferences, and evolving market dynamics. These challenges, Borges believes, could impact BigCommerce Holdings, Inc. ability to sustain its growth momentum and achieve its strategic objectives. Furthermore, Borges adjusted the price target for BigCommerce Holdings, Inc. from $11.50 to $9.50, reflecting a more tempered outlook for the company’s performance in the near term. Despite the downgrade, Borges acknowledged that BigCommerce Holdings, Inc. remains a notable player in the e-commerce industry, with significant potential for long-term success. However, the analyst advised investors to exercise prudence given the uncertainties surrounding the company’s mid-market expansion efforts.

04. Charter Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ:CHTR)

Price Reaction after the Downgrade: -15.56 (-4.87%)

On February 5, Charter Communications, Inc., a major player in the telecommunications industry, faced a notable setback as J.P. Morgan downgraded its stock. The downgrade, executed by JPMorgan analyst Sebastiano Petti, shifted the recommendation from Overweight to Neutral. Additionally, the price target was revised downward from $445 to $370. The downgrade decision by J.P. Morgan was primarily influenced by concerning trends in Charter Communications, Inc. broadband subscriber numbers, indicating weaker performance in this critical segment. Furthermore, there were indications of slower growth in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), adding to the rationale behind the downgrade. The market reacted swiftly to the downgrade, with Charter Communications, Inc. stock price experiencing a significant decline of 4.87% by the closing bell, settling at $303.65. This downturn reflects investor apprehension and the impact of the revised outlook provided by J.P. Morgan’s analysis. The downgrade serves as a cautionary signal to investors, prompting them to reassess their positions in Charter Communications, Inc. and potentially adjust their investment strategies accordingly. It underscores the importance of closely monitoring industry trends, company performance metrics, and analyst recommendations in making informed investment decisions in the dynamic telecommunications sector.

03. GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ:GFS)

Price Reaction after the Downgrade: -3.71 (-6.70%)

On February 5, JP Morgan made a significant adjustment to its stance on GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc., a prominent player in the semiconductor manufacturing industry. The renowned investment bank downgraded its rating for GLOBALFOUNDRIES from “Overweight” to “Neutral” and concurrently lowered the price target from $65.00 to $56.00. This strategic shift by JP Morgan reflects a reevaluation of the semiconductor sector landscape, considering various factors influencing GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. performance. The decision to downgrade suggests a reassessment of the company’s growth prospects and market conditions by JP Morgan analysts. Following the downgrade, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. experienced a notable decline in its market price, plummeting by 6.70% by the closing bell on February 5. The stock price concluded at $51.57, underscoring the market’s response to the revised outlook provided by JP Morgan. The downgrade serves as a signal to investors, urging them to reevaluate their positions in GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and potentially adjust their investment strategies accordingly. It highlights the importance of staying abreast of industry developments and expert analyses when navigating the dynamic semiconductor market.

02. JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (NYSE:JKS)

Price Reaction after the Downgrade: -2.33 (-8.92%)

On February 5, Daiwa Capital Markets, a notable player in the financial industry, revised its outlook on JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (NYSE:JKS), a key player in the solar energy industry. The renowned capital markets firm downgraded JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. rating from “outperform” to “neutral” and concurrently established a price target of $25.00 for the company. This adjustment by Daiwa Capital Markets underscores a shift in perspective regarding JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. performance and future prospects within the solar energy sector. The decision to downgrade suggests a reevaluation of the company’s growth potential and market dynamics by Daiwa’s analysts. Following the downgrade, JinkoSolar witnessed a significant decline in its market price, plummeting by 8.92% by the closing bell on February 5. The stock price concluded at $23.78, reflecting the market’s response to the revised assessment provided by Daiwa Capital Markets. The downgrade serves as a signal to investors, urging them to reassess their positions in JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. and potentially recalibrate their investment strategies accordingly. It underscores the importance of staying informed about industry shifts and expert analyses when navigating the evolving landscape of the solar energy market.

01. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (NYSE:APD)

Price Reaction after the Downgrade: -40.15 (-15.55%)

On February 5, Wells Fargo & Company, a prominent financial institution, revised its assessment of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (NYSE:APD), a key player in the industrial gases industry. The renowned financial firm downgraded Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. from an “overweight” rating to an “equal weight” rating, indicating a shift in perspective regarding the company’s performance and profitability prospects within the industrial gases sector. This adjustment by Wells Fargo & Company reflects a reevaluation of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. potential earnings and market position. The decision to downgrade suggests a revised outlook on the company’s profitability compared to previous expectations. Following the downgrade, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. experienced a substantial decline in its market price, plummeting by 15.55% by the closing bell on February 5. The stock price concluded at $218.02, reflecting the market’s response to Wells Fargo’s revised assessment. The downgrade serves as a signal to investors, prompting them to reconsider their positions in Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. and potentially adjust their investment strategies accordingly.

You can also check out 11 Best American Defense Stocks To Buy According to Analysts and 12 Best American Bank Stocks To Buy According to Analysts.