Roblox (RBLX) Has Lost Two Thirds of Its Value. Is the User Growth Still Real?

Roblox Corporation (NYSE:RBLX) closed at $44.12 on October 2, down about two-thirds over twelve months. A fall that steep normally means something broke. Users left, growth stalled, a competitor took the category.

None of that happened. Roblox is still adding players and still collecting their money. What the market repriced was not the business but how much it is prepared to pay for one that does not yet turn a profit.

READ ALSO: MongoDB (MDB) vs Snowflake (SNOW): Which is a Better Stock to Buy?

The Growth is Not the Problem:

Roblox is still growing faster than almost any company of its size. Revenue reached $5.69 billion over the past twelve months and grew 35.90% in the most recent quarter. That is roughly three times the rate Salesforce is managing and four times Nokia’s.

More importantly, the cash is real. Roblox generated $1.48 billion of levered free cash flow over the past twelve months. A business burning through its users’ attention without converting it would not produce that.

The balance sheet supports the position too, with $3.01 billion of cash against $1.84 billion of debt.

So the thing the bears said would break has not broken. Users keep arriving and keep spending, and the platform converts that spending into cash.

DON’T MISS: Duolingo (DUOL) vs Coursera (COUR): Which is a Better Stock to Buy?

Growth That Does Not Reach the Bottom Line:

Roblox converts negative 17.61% of revenue into net profit. Operating margin is negative 13.27%. Diluted earnings per share came to negative $1.45.

A company growing this fast that still cannot turn a profit is making a specific bet. Scale eventually fixes the economics. Every year it does not, that bet costs more.

The cost structure explains why. Roblox pays its developers a share of everything spent on the platform, and it carries heavy infrastructure and trust and safety costs that rise with usage rather than falling.

That is the uncomfortable part. In most software businesses, the marginal cost of another user is close to zero. At Roblox it is not, because the content is made by people who get paid and the platform has to be policed.

Return on equity is negative 432.28%, a figure distorted by a small equity base but not a flattering one.

There is a company growing almost as fast as Roblox that already converts more than a fifth of revenue into profit, and it trades at under 14 times forward earnings. You can find it in our 10 Best Stocks to Buy for High Returns in 2026.

The Valuation Case:

Roblox closed at $44.12 on October 2, about 65% over twelve months, on a market value of $35.00 billion. Revenue grew 35.90% last quarter.

The growth looks sustainable. Free cash flow confirms the revenue is actually being collected rather than booked, and nothing in the reported user numbers suggests a plateau.

Price is harder to judge because there is no earnings multiple to quote. On sales, the company trades at roughly six times revenue, and on its free cash flow the multiple is about 24 times.

That is the real comparison to make. Twenty-four times cash flow for growth in the mid thirties is not obviously expensive. Take-Two, the nearest listed comparable, trades at 28.17 times forward while growing revenue 2.00%. Roblox is growing roughly eighteen times faster for a lower multiple on cash.

What matters is whether Roblox earns a place against those. We ranked the alternatives here.

Conclusion:

The growth is real, and the market has stopped paying for it, which is the setup value investors look for. Revenue is still compounding in the mid-thirties, free cash flow reached $1.48 billion, and the balance sheet carries more cash than debt. However, the business still loses money on every dollar it brings in, and its cost structure does not improve automatically with scale the way most software does. Buyers at this price are underwriting a margin that has never existed, at a company whose shares have already fallen two-thirds, waiting for it.

Market Sentiment:

Roblox Corporation was held by 52 hedge funds with a combined stake value of about $4.75 billion at the end of Q2 2026 in the Insider Monkey database. This is down from 66 hedge fund holders, although the value of those positions rose from around $4.11 billion in the previous quarter.

READ NEXT: Duolingo (DUOL) vs Coursera (COUR): Which is a Better Stock to Buy? and Reddit (RDDT) vs Snap (SNAP): Which is a Better Stock to Buy?

This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.