There is little doubt that cloud storage is the future of media in general and music in particular, and a number of companies are looking to this trend as way of generating revenues in 2013.
Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) are looking to provide cloud-based services, even though they already have flourishing and successful music download businesses. There are many benefits for companies, such as the necessity of keeping only a master copy of a song on its servers to cater to multiple listeners simultaneously. Moreover, subscription-based services can often be more profitable than the sales of single tracks or albums, and streaming music can cut down the frequency of piracy.
There are clear benefits to consumers also. They do not have to worry about the storage capacity of their music devices because everything is stored on the cloud and available via the Internet on any device that you chose in any location. All you need, for instance, is an Internet enabled smart phone. You can also save space on your hard drive by permanently storing all your music on the cloud which is useful if you’re moving to smaller computers with flash storage or using different devices without permanent storage for your music.
Apple provides iTunes Match through which you can simply buy or upload an album and have it accessible on all your iOS based devices instantly for a subscription of $24.99 a year.
Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) and Amazon are competing with iTunes Match by launching their own services. Amazon has launched a version of its MP3 store aimed specifically at the Apple iPhone and iPod Touch by allowing owners to buy their music from Amazon through these devices and then access it from anywhere. Amazon introduced scan-and-match services after a year of offering only storage and streaming, while Google Music recently fine-tuned its uploading and streaming services to provide more for users than just music storage.
Both services are equipped with many of the features offered by iTunes Match, The Amazon service costs as much as Apple’s while Google Music is completely free. The Street Journal observes that Apple and Amazon’s will use the subscriber fee for the payments to music labels and publishers that is required to match songs that may be pirated while Google has decided to pay by digging into its own pockets.
Google Play lets you to store up to 20,000 songs on its servers, while iTunes Match can store your entire music library in iCloud and match up to 25,000 tracks though this limit does not include songs purchased through the iTunes store. Amazon’s cloud locker service, which is called the Cloud Player Premium, has a free version allowing up to 250 imported songs, while the premium service at $24.99 a year enables subscribers to upload 250,000 imported tracks. These limits do not include purchases that were made from Amazon MP3 directly, or even old CDs whose purchase may have slipped your mind.
Once your music is uploaded to Google Music, you can listen to it on the Web or use your mobile including both Android and iOS devices, though the latter requires an HTML 5-rendered webpage. In iTunes Match, music can be accessed through all iOS devices, as well as the iTunes desktop client. On Amazon Cloud Player, you can access your collection on the Web or via an iOS or Android app.