In this series, I’m going to take a look at the cash flow statements of some of the biggest names in the FTSE 100 to see whether their dividends are being funded in a sustainable way, from genuine spare cash. Today, I’m looking at RSA Insurance Group plc (LON:RSA), the 300 year-old general insurance company previously known as Royal Sun Alliance.
Does RSA have enough cash?
As private investors, we want to back businesses that are able to pay their dividends out of free cash flow each year. I define free cash flow as the cash that’s left over after capital expenditure, interest payments, and tax deductions. With that in mind, let’s look at RSA’s cash flow from the last 4.5 years:
|Free cash flow (£m)||81||-294||411||285||331|
|Dividend payments (£m)||189||198||248||321||202|
|Free cash flow/dividend*||0.4||-1.5||1.7||0.9||1.6|
RSA’s cash flow statements provide a good example of how a dividend can be reliably covered by earnings, but not by cash flow. By my calculation, RSA’s dividends have only been covered by free cash flow an average of 0.6 times over the last 4.5 years, meaning that 40 pence of every pound paid in dividends has come from cash reserves or borrowed funds.
Although this isn’t something I like to see in a company, in RSA’s case it isn’t too alarming, since the company has maintained a cash balance of greater than 1 billion pounds throughout this period. What’s more, judging from its 2012 half-yearly report, this insurance giant generated cash strongly last year, as its cash balance rose by 135 million pounds to 1,376 million pounds during the first half of 2012.
A 7% dividend yield?
Now we’ve established that RSA can comfortably afford its dividend payments, we need to question why its 7% yield is so high — after all, it’s more than double the 3.3% average of the FTSE 100. The short answer is that since it peaked in 2007, RSA’s share price has drifted downwards to a low of about 98 pence in June 2012, thanks to a combination of falling profits and the effects of the eurozone crisis.