Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (NWL), Avery Dennison Corp (AVY): Expensive or Way, Way Too Expensive?

Page 1 of 2

Speaking at the Barclays Capital Back-to-School Consumer Conference on Wednesday, consumer and commercial products maker Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (NYSE:NWL) CEO Michael Polk told investors his company is off to a “solid” start in 2013 — and that he has every confidence of hitting the company’s earnings guidance for the year.

If only that were good enough.

Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (NYSE:NWL)According to Polk, Rubbermaid will likely earn about $1.42 per diluted share this year, and would be likely to earn as much as $1.82 but for a series of onetime charges to earnings. Investors welcomed the news, bidding up Rubbermaid shares by 3.2% in midday trading, but I have to say that I think that’s the wrong reaction.

How high should Rubbermaid bounce?
As a medium-sized “conglomerate” company, with its hands in many pots, finding perfectly analogous companies to which to compare Rubbermaid to see if it’s “priced right” is no simple task — but there does appear to be a valuation disconnect here.

Avery Dennison Corp (NYSE:AVY), which competes with Rubbermaid in some business products categories, and The Clorox Company (NYSE:CLX) and The Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE:PG), which compete in cleaning products, all look a bit cheaper than Rubbermaid at trailing P/E ratios of 18.7, 19.4, and 20.1, respectively. Mattel, Inc. (NASDAQ:MAT), whose children-focused wares arguably rival Rubbermaid’s Graco, Aprica, and Teutonia brands, is even cheaper than these other Rubbermaid competitors, sporting a trailing P/E of 18.6.

As I say, while the case is hardly open and shut, Rubbermaid does look expensive relative to the competition.

And judged on its own merits, Rubbermaid looks even more overpriced. Based on trailing earnings, Rubbermaid shares currently carry a valuation of 21 times earnings. Valued on the company’s likely earnings for the full year, that P/E drops to 18.7. Valued on Polk’s suggested “adjusted” earnings, it could drop as low as 14.6.

Page 1 of 2
Loading...