Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Monster Beverage Corp (MNST), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) & PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP): Will April Showers Bring May Flowers for This Beverage Maker?

Page 1 of 3

The soft drink industry is generally considered a mature, saturated market that is dominated by some major players – The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE:KO), PepsiCo, Inc. (NYSE:PEP) and Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc. (NYSE:DPS). Yet energy drink maker Monster Beverage Corp (NASDAQ:MNST), has defied that generalization and emerged as a robust growth stock.

Monster Beverage Corp (NASDAQ:MNST)

Monster Beverage surged over 10% on June 4, after the company reported surprisingly positive sales trends for April and May, indicating that the company was showing resilience in the face of bad press regarding the safety of its energy drinks. Despite the recent rally, shares of Monster are still down 15% over the past twelve months. Therefore, should investors consider Monster a safe growth stock, or are there still too many pitfalls ahead for its core business?

April showers bring May flowers

For its first quarter, reported a month ago, Monster Beverage Corp (NASDAQ:MNST) earned $0.37 per share, or $63.5 million, a significant drop from the $0.41 per share, or $76.1 million, it earned in the prior year quarter. Revenue rose 6.5% to $484.2 million. Both its bottom and top lines missed the consensus estimate of $0.46 per share on revenue of $502.2 million.

Monster attributed its disappointing earnings to $8.3 million in distributor-termination obligations, $4.7 million in unfavorable currency impacts, and $3.0 million in litigation costs associated with regulatory matters regarding its energy drinks. Investors were not impressed, and shares plunged over 14% on May 8.

Yet the stock bounced back recently, after the company reported positive sales trends for April and May, with gross sales for April and May rising a combined 9% year-on-year. Based on April’s 6% year-on-year growth, this implies that sales growth for May will come in at 12% to 13%. This indicates that despite the barrage of negative publicity Monster’s energy drinks are receiving, consumers aren’t too concerned. A positive note from BMO Capital Markets, stating that “the incessant negative media coverage of the energy drink category has created an attractive entry point for the stock,” also boosted shares.

America’s energy addiction

Monster is currently at the center of a lawsuit regarding the death of a 14-year old Maryland girl, Anais Fournier. The girl’s parents claimed that her death was caused by the consumption of two of Monster’s energy drinks within a 24-hour period, which led to “
cardiac arrhythmia due to caffeine toxicity,” according to the coroner’s report. Although Fournier had an existing heart condition, it wasn’t severe enough for her doctor to impose restrictions on caffeine products.

Monster stated that two doctors hired by the company found no evidence that its drink directly caused Fournier’s heart failure. The company also reiterated that a single cup of coffee has more caffeine than one of its drinks. Yet critics have pointed out that coffee isn’t meant for children, and coffee is not intended to be gulped down like Monster’s energy drinks. The wrongful death case is headed towards mediation on November 26.

The case has prompted the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to start a widespread investigation into other recent deaths to see if they were related to energy drinks from Monster and its competitors, which are often marketed as “magic elixirs” for a quick boost in productivity. These drinks include Red Bull, Monster, and 5-Hour Energy.

Outgrowing the competition

America’s addiction to energy drinks has evolved in phases. At first, there was The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE:KO). Later, there were drinks with even higher caffeine and sugar content, such as PepsiCo, Inc. (NYSE:PEP)’s Mountain Dew. This complemented America’s rising consumption of coffee, which now averages 400 million cups per day – more than a cup per person.

Over the past decade, however, soda and coffee have taken a backseat to energy drinks, which became mainstream with the introduction of Red Bull in 1987. Monster Energy, which arrived in 2002, caught up quickly, and now controls approximately 35% of the global energy drink market.

Page 1 of 3