Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) Fined, Google Inc (GOOG) on Deck

Just about every major news organization reported Wednesday that Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) is being fined over $730 million by the European Union Commission for failing to follow a court order that directed the company to offer users a choice of browser when installing the Windows operating system. The fine comes just weeks after the Commission warned that under newly formulated rules, it will soon be able to fine companies like Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) up to 2% of revenue, or $1 billion, for violations. While shareholders of these two technology behemoths will likely be forced to chalk this up to the cost of doing business, they should not do so in silence. Microsoft has apologized for the glitch and Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) is looking to settle, but the actions of the Commission are nothing short of offensive. Neither stock is likely to be significantly affected by the fines, but the precedent should be considered.

Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT)The anatomy of the fine
At the end of 10 years of antitrust litigation, Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) agreed to settlement terms in 2009 that included a provision requiring the company to offer a choice of the top 12 most popular browsers to users who bought a computer that used Windows. The company took responsibility for what it called a glitch that caused roughly 28 million computers to be sold without the choice being included according to a Bloomberg report; Reuters had the number closer to 15 million. The violation took place between May 2011 and July 2012.

EU Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia explained the fine: “If companies agree to offer commitments which then become legally binding, they must do what they have committed to do or face the consequences.” He went on to warn: “I hope this decision will make companies think twice before they even think of intentionally breaching their obligations or even of neglecting their duty to ensure strict compliance.”

While I absolutely agree with the explicit sense of Almunia’s words, the very concept of the fine and the size of it are absurd. Leaving aside the reality that a Competition Commissioner is an affront to the idea of free enterprise, the fine is simultaneously too small, too large, and without merit based on the original settlement. This is regulation run amuck and overreaching in dangerous ways.

What actually happened
It is important to understand that the glitch in Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT)’s software meant that a browser option screen was not included as part of the Windows installation process. Instead of seeing that screen and opting for the browser of choice, these users were defaulted to use the Microsoft browser because they had opted to use the Microsoft OS. These poor downtrodden users were, therefore, subjected to the incredible inconvenience of having to install a second browser — a procedure that takes roughly 30 seconds to initiate.

Arguably any user that does not understand this, and therefore might need protecting, would be equally ignorant of any differences that might exist between the options. Furthermore, for many users that have their machine set up by a vendor where the machine is purchased, they would never have seen the screen anyway. Thank goodness the EU Commission is here to keep us all safe.

As punishment for this atrocity, Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) has been fined $26 per user for each offending machine. The total $731 million fine represents roughly 1% of the company’s 2012 revenue, which seems steep for costing users a few seconds of their time. On the other hand, given the amount of potential advertising revenue that might be generated from each user, $26 per case might seem low. This divergence takes me back to the original premise that the settlement itself was absurd.

Is Google next?

DOWNLOAD FREE REPORT: Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks

Let Warren Buffett, George Soros, Steve Cohen, and Daniel Loeb WORK FOR YOU.

If you want to beat the low cost index funds by 19 percentage points per year, look no further than our monthly newsletter.In this free report you can find an in-depth analysis of the performance of Warren Buffett's entire historical stock picks. We uncovered Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks and a way to for Buffett to improve his returns by more than 4 percentage points per year.

Bonus Biotech Stock Pick: You can also find a detailed bonus biotech stock pick that we expect to return more than 50% within 12 months.
Subscribe me to Insider Monkey's Free Daily Newsletter
This is a FREE report from Insider Monkey. Credit Card is NOT required.