Issuing More Shares: Good or Bad? – Buckeye Partners, L.P. (BPL), Citigroup Inc. (C) and More

Page 1 of 2

Buckeye Partners, L.P. (NYSE:BPL) recently announced plans to issue additional limited partnership units. Citigroup Inc. (NYSE:C) issued preferred shares to the government in 2008 during the financial meltdown. Simon Property Group, Inc (NYSE:SPG) issued shares in early 2012 and again in late 2012. How can you tell if these corporate actions are good or bad for shareholders?

Same Pie, More Slices

When a company issues shares of stock, it is, basically, selling ownership in the company and, thus, a right to the earnings of the company. It’s a pretty basic concept that underpins modern finance. In simple terms, a company is taking its earnings pie and cutting slices to give to shareholders. Eight shareholders, eight slices. Eight million shareholders, eight million slices.

Buckeye Partners, L.P. (NYSE:BPL)

With a secondary offering, however, the pie is the same size, but there are more slices being made. So if earnings are $100 and there are 10 shares, each shareholder is entitled to $10 of earnings. If the company doubles its share count to 20, then that same $100 pie is now cut into 20 slices, leaving shareholders with $5 each. That doesn’t sound like a good thing at all.

It All Depends

The answer is that it depends on why the shares are being issued. In most situations, the company receives cash from a stock issuance. The question to ask is what’s that money going to be used for?

For example Citigroup’s sale of preferred shares to the U.S. government was, essentially, an effort to ensure the company’s solvency. On one level that’s great, but the cost was quite high. After several machinations, the government wound up converting the preferred shares into common stock and was then a major company shareholder. When it sold its shares to the public, all that happened was the pie got cut into more slices. Investors probably would have been better off just moving on from Citi than sitting tight.

In early 2012, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:FOLD) sold $62 million worth of stock to help fund its research efforts. That seems like a good thing, but, in late 2012 Amigal, a drug being developed with GlaxoSmithKline plc (ADR) (NYSE:GSK), performed poorly in a phase III trial. The shares fell almost 50%.

Although issuing shares to fund research is normal for biotech firms, those new shares are simply more claims on potential future earnings (most biotechs suffer through years of losses while trying to bring new drugs to market). If Amigal, or the company’s other drugs, don’t make it to market, investors are only getting hurt by additional share sales. Biotech is a high stakes investment world, so new share issues aren’t looked on as bad, but they should be something investors think about in relation to a company’s drug pipeline and the drug approval process.

The Business Model

Real estate investment trusts (REITs) are another area in which new shares are frequently issued. For example, in early 2012 Simon Property Group, Inc (NYSE:SPG) issued shares to help pay for a pair of acquisitions. In the normal course of business, REITs use credit facilities to pay for purchases and, once the acquisition closes, issue shares to raise cash to pay down the credit facility.

That’s a good thing, since the company is growing the business. It also forces these companies to get the market’s approval every time it buys something. A poor market reception to a stock issuance can be a sign that the market isn’t pleased. However, not all stock sales benefit a company.

Page 1 of 2