Surf gear company Quiksilver, Inc. (NYSE:ZQK) wiped out recently, after the Huntington Beach, Calif.-based company reported first quarter earnings that sorely disappointed investors. Although Quiksilver, Inc. (NYSE:ZQK) was hanging ten just a month ago – with its stock hitting a 52-week high on optimism for a recovery in the retail sector – the odds are now stacked against the company like an insurmountable wave. Should investors be considered that Quiksilver, Inc. (NYSE:ZQK) is about to surf headfirst into a tsunami, or just lay back and soak up some rays while the stock recovers?
Choppy first quarter waves
For its first quarter, Quiksilver, Inc. (NYSE:ZQK) posted a net loss of $31.1 million, or $0.19 per share, down from a loss of $0.14 per share, or $22.6 million, it posted a year earlier. Excluding restructuring charges and impairments, Quiksilver’s earnings came in at $0.16 per share. Analysts polled by FactSet expected a loss of $0.07 per share, on an adjusted basis.
Revenue declined 4.1% from $449.6 million to $431.0 million, also coming in under the analyst estimate of $465 million.
Humble beginnings and gnarly challenges
Over the past four decades, Quiksilver, Inc. (NYSE:ZQK) has been an inspirational rags-to-riches story that has been well documented by the media. 38 years ago, former CEO Bob McKnight founded the company with surfers Peter Townend and Jeff Hakman. Together, the trio established Quiksilver in a Newport Beach garage.
McKnight started by selling surfing shorts to shops from the trunk of his car – and eventually went on to become CEO of a multinational company that generates approximately $2 billion in annual sales.
However, the recession of 2007-2009 dealt the company a critical blow, from which it has yet to fully recover. In addition, its ill-timed acquisition of ski wear company Rossignol for $560.8 million in 2005 sent its debt skyrocketing over $1 billion. The acquisition never paid off, and Quiksilver sold the brand for a humbling $147 million to Chartreuse & Mont Blanc in 2008. McKnight calls the ordeal “one of the most financially and emotionally painful chapters in Quiksilver’s history.”
McKnight stepped down last year, handing over the reins of the company to former The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS) and NIKE, Inc. (NYSE:NKE) executive Andy Mooney. Mooney has been in charge of the company since Jan. 11.
Quiksilver offers three main labels – Quiksilver, Roxy and DC Shoes.
Quiksilver, Inc. (NYSE:ZQK)’s namesake brand sells surf apparel, surfboards and other surf gear. It posted a 7% drop in revenue to $179 million.
Roxy is Quiksilver’s female surf gear brand, which also reported a 7% decline to $115 million. Roxy was established in 1991, and originally targeted 14 to 17 year old females. Its product line has since been expanded to also include young women in their early to mid-20s.
Quiksilver recently discontinued its Quiksilver Women’s and Girls’ lines, which have been increasingly overshadowed by its Roxy label. Quiksilver Women was launched in 2008, with the intent to focus on the 18 to 24 year-old female demographic. It was later expanded to include Quiksilver Girls, but the rising popularity of Roxy gradually overlapped both lines.
The company’s skate footwear brand, DC Shoes, was its only source of positive growth, reporting 1% growth to $109 million. Same-store sales across all of its company-owned locations slid 1%.
Losses across the world
Over 60% of Quiksilver’s revenue is generated from international markets. It operates 829 company or licensed retail stores across 90 countries.
Quiksilver, Inc. (NYSE:ZQK)’s Americas (North and South America) segment fared the worst, reporting a 9% plunge in revenue from $205 million to $186 million. Revenue in EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa) slid 1% from $171 million to $169 million. Revenue in the APAC (Asia-Pacific) region also dropped 2% from $75 million to $73 million.
The company attributed $3 million in losses to negative foreign currency impacts, versus a favorable foreign currency gain of $2 million the previous year.
The Foolish fundamentals
Quiksilver’s gross margin edged up from 50.7% to 51.0%, which the company attributes to lower sales in its wholesale and Americas segments, which generally report lower gross margins. Lower sales of lower margin products in turn boosted the average gross margin of products sold – at the cost of lower sales volume.
Quiksilver’s SG&A (sales, general & administrative) expenses decreased from $230 million to $225 million, as a result of ongoing expense reductions efforts. However, the majority of those savings were offset by a $4 million increase in e-commerce expenses used to expand and maintain its online business.
In this chart, we can see several problems with Quiksilver’s financials.
Quiksilver, Inc. (NYSE:ZQK)’s long-term debt is steadily rising, but its cash reserves and free cash flow growth are declining. Although its expenses are steadily declining, the improvement is insufficient to completely offset the other losses.
Quiksilver’s primary competitors are NIKE, Inc. (NYSE:NKE), Adidas and Billabong. Although its competitors offer a wider range of athletic products, they cater to the same demographic of younger, active adults. Let’s see how these four companies measure up to each other fundamentally.
|Forward P/E||5-year PEG||Price to Sales (ttm)||Return on Equity||Debt to Equity||Profit Margin||Qty. Revenue Growth (Y-O-Y)||Qty. Earnings Growth |
Source: Yahoo Finance, March 12.
From this chart we can see that Australian rival Billabong, which had a pretty rough ride over the past five years, is clearly the cheapest stock. However, it is currently approaching penny stock territory for a reason – a lack of profits, negative profit margins and declining revenue growth all indicate that it is in serious trouble. Yet Billabong, which offers surf, skate, snow and sports apparel, has the most similar product line to Quiksilver.
Meanwhile, larger companies NIKE, Inc. (NYSE:NKE) and Adidas have been able to post positive revenue growth, but are also finding it difficult to grow their bottom lines. However, many investors consider Adidas and Nike to be large enough to be lifted by a rising tide in consumer sentiment – while Quiksilver and Billabong may be left behind.
Yet a look at the price performance of these four stocks over the past 12 months reveals an unusual trend – Quiksilver is actually outperforming all of its rivals except for Adidas.
Source: Google Finance, March 12.
The Foolish Bottom Line
Despite the fact the Quiksilver’s stock price has held up better than other athletic apparel retailers over the past year, I wouldn’t recommend investors to buy this stock now. Under new CEO Andy Mooney, the company is still trying to turn itself around by restructuring management, cutting costs and expanding margins.
Yet losses across the world, anemic same-stores sales growth, declining revenue and a lack of profits simply tell me that there are better retail stocks out there, more deserving of your investment.
The article Is Quiksilver About to Surf Into a Tsunami? originally appeared on Fool.com and is written by Leo Sun.
Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.