Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Is Pain Therapeutics, Inc. (PTIE) And Remoxy’s Long And Winding Road Nearing An End?

Pain Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:PTIE) just got word from the FDA that the advisory committee meeting scheduled for August 5 to discuss its lead development candidate, Remoxy, is no longer needed. While it’s a little bit presumptive to suggest that this is good news for the company (and the drug’s chances of approval come PDUFA), so long as the NDA is still under active review – which it is – then it’s reasonable to conclude positive inference. With this in mind, and ahead of the PDUFA date, here’s a look at the drug in question and a discussion as to what an approval might mean for the company and its shareholders going forward.

As mentioned, the drug is called Remoxy, and it’s an abuse deterrent oxycodone candidate. Those familiar with the biotech space will likely have stumbled across this one before – it’s been in development for more than a decade and its rights have juggled back and forward between entities, big and small. A quick potted history: in 2002, a company called DURECT Corporation (NASDAQ:DRRX) licensed a technology called Oradur to Pain Therapeutics. Shortly after, Pain did a deal with the then King Pharma, a company which Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) acquired in 2012, that saw a large portion of the Oradur rights (by this point it had been rebranded as Remoxy) transfer to King. As part of the acquisition, and reported as being one of the driving assets behind Pfizer’s decision, the rights transferred to the latter.

Pfizer proceeded to run a host of trials on Remoxy across the two years subsequent to its acquisition, and met with the FDA on numerous occasions in an attempt to carve out a path to approval. Suddenly, however, in October 2014, the pharma giant backed out and returned all rights to Pain Therapeutics. Of course, at the time, this was seen as the end of the line for Remoxy. Markets interpreted Pfizer’s ditching of the drug as the company saying it couldn’t see a path to commercialization, despite the battery of studies and data derived from said studies, and consequently sold off on Pain Therapeutics and DURECT.

David Smart/

David Smart/

Fast forward two more years, Pain Therapeutics resubmits the NDA, and the FDA accepts it for review on April 12, 2016. Having initially scheduled an advisory review meeting, and as noted in the introduction to this piece, the FDA just unscheduled the meeting, opting to carry on the review without the aid of an advisory panel. Could this finally be the submission that gets a green light?

There’s an obvious question – if all that was required was a resubmission (which would have essentially cost nothing – say a couple of million dollars) – then why did the Pfizer dump the drug? Well, Pfizer is developing its own abuse deterrent oxycodone, ALO-02. The drug is pretty much neck and neck with Remoxy (it just had an advisory panel recommend approval) and will target exactly the same market. Both drugs are safe and effective, but there’s one key difference – Pfizer won’t have to pay royalties on ALO-02 sales, whereas if it carried Remoxy through to commercialization, it would have to pay royalties to both DURECT and Remoxy. It makes sense, therefore, that Pfizer would want to focus on its wholly owned candidate, rather than go at the market with a part owned compound.

This is speculation, of course, but it stands to reason. More importantly, it offers up an explanation as to why Pain Therapeutics has pushed forward with development, while Pfizer chose not to.

So that’s where things stand. PDUFA is set for September 25, and at that date, we could finally see a drug with a more than fourteen-year development history, and a host of agency resubmissions, pick up an FDA green light. If it does, peak sales are estimated at $1.5 billion, so there’s plenty of upside for both Pain and DURECT, which are currently valued at $99 million and $175 million respectively. If it fails, however, chances are it will be the end of the line, and both companies will take a hit. Think 50-70% downside for Pain Therapeutics, and 20-30% downside for DURECT. One to keep an eye on, but with such a checkered past, it warrants caution.

Follow Pain Therapeutics Inc (NASDAQ:PTIE)
Trade (NASDAQ:PTIE) Now!

Note: This article is written by Mark Collins and originally published at Market Exclusive.

DOWNLOAD FREE REPORT: Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks

Let Warren Buffett, George Soros, Steve Cohen, and Daniel Loeb WORK FOR YOU.

If you want to beat the low cost index funds by 19 percentage points per year, look no further than our monthly newsletter.In this free report you can find an in-depth analysis of the performance of Warren Buffett's entire historical stock picks. We uncovered Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks and a way to for Buffett to improve his returns by more than 4 percentage points per year.

Bonus Biotech Stock Pick: You can also find a detailed bonus biotech stock pick that we expect to return more than 50% within 12 months.
Subscribe me to Insider Monkey's Free Daily Newsletter
This is a FREE report from Insider Monkey. Credit Card is NOT required.