Google Inc (GOOG), QUALCOMM, Inc. (QCOM) – The Moto X: Not Good Enough

Page 1 of 2

Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) just announced the release of the Moto X. Finally, we get our first glimpse at what Motorola has been up to since Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) bought it out.

The Moto X


Source: The Next Web

Motorola believes in the Moto X. At first glance, the device appears to be minimalistic. It doesn’t come jam-packed with features, as it runs the stock Android operating system.

The device comes with Android 4.2.2. The Android version matters, because certain applications require a certain version Android. For example, Instagram Video is only available on smartphones running Android 4.1 and up.

QUALCOMM, Inc.Product specification include: 720p 4.7 inch screen, 10MP camera, 16 GB of storage, and a dual core 1.7 GHZ QUALCOMM, Inc. (NASDAQ:QCOM) processor. The dual core chip is the third most powerful processor from QUALCOMM, Inc. (NASDAQ:QCOM).

The price of the Moto X is $199 on a post-paid plan (basically, a two-year contract).

Let’s get critical

If this is the best product that Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) can come up with, it has failed. The new iOS 7 operating system and the unparalleled retail distribution of Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) are going to crush Motorola. All of the foot traffic that’s going to pass by the Apple Store this coming holiday season will see the company’s multitude of releases. The next generation iPad, next generation iPhone, and (if the rumor of Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) iPhone Lite is true) the iPhone Lite product line will pop up too. Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is notorious for generating excitement for its products and services that Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG)/Motorola simply does not have.

Not only has the imagery of owning a Motorola product not changed, the product specifications of one haven’t improved by much either.

In summary, the engineering team debated the size of the screen and talked about standardizing the phone to match the standard Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) operating system. Motorola positioned its manufacturing facility in Texas, which equates into rising costs of development and zero return from innovation.

You might as well shelf the team that came up with this. It’s merely a mid-level device that’s priced at the high-end. If I wanted a blue phone, I would buy one from Samsung. If I want a red phone, I’d buy one from Nokia. The idea that the color of a phone would influence purchasing decisions has got to be a joke.

Google should be fine

The good news is that Motorola isn’t a large component of Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG)’s revenue. Over the first half of 2013, Google’s advertising and application business earned $13.1 billion. The Motorola segment generated $998 million over the same period, meaning that Motorola represents less than 10% of Google’s revenues.

The bad news comes from Motorola’s lack of contribution to net profit. The company’s aging patents and other assets have to be depreciated. So, even if Motorola is doing great in terms of cash flow, the company has to replace assets on an ongoing basis. What’s difficult about owning a technology company is that long-term assets often get reclassified because their market value goes down significantly. This is why Verizon and AT&T are cash flow rich, but net income poor. Depreciation on aging cell towers leads to massive write downs (we went from non-existent cellular Internet to 4G LTE within a decade, after all). Long-term assets aren’t really “long term” in the world of technology.

Page 1 of 2