Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Goldman Was Pleased About the Quant Liquidity Crunch

Mark Carhart used to run the Goldman Sachs Asset Management with Ray Iwanowski. Goldman’s flagship Global Alpha hedge fund lost almost 40% in 2007 and had to be rescued by a $3 Billion injection. Last week Carhart gave a speech addressing Columbia University’s Quantitative Finance students. He said Goldman’s $3 Billion injection stabilized the markets and probably saved the Quants from complete destruction (he didn’t say “complete destruction” per se but we that’s how understood what he meant).  Prior to the 2007 quant liquidity crunch, Global Alpha had $11.5 Billion under management. In the middle of 2008, their AUM went down to $2.5 Billion. In 2008, Global Alpha returned 2%, which didn’t make up for the enormous losses incurred in 2007, so Carhart “retired”.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE:GS)

Carhart revealed that Goldman was actually pleased with the Quant fiasco. They saw first hand in 2007 how liquidity in the markets can dry up in an instant, so they had ample time to prepare for the bigger crisis in 2008, which catapulted them to the top of the financial world.

Mark Carhart started his presentation by listing James Montier’s arguments about behavioral biases. He said he tries to remove emotional and behavioral biases from the decision making process. Then he explained that quantitative investing is getting crowded; everybody is chasing the same strategies based on the same academic research and that historical results don’t hold anymore. They weren’t able to see the magnitude of crowding prior to the Quant Liquidity Crunch. When the bets turn out as expected, everybody makes money and thinks their strategy is working. However, when the bets start losing money and everybody heads to the door, that’s when the real trouble begins.

In order to not repeat the same mistakes again, Carhart believes quants should  be investing in research continually and to try to understand the evolution in market dynamics. Carhart used some of the slides from a 2007 presentation by Kent Daniel, co-chief investment officer at GSAM in 2009. Kent Daniel is currently teaching at Columbia’s Business School. http://www.ny.frb.org/research/conference/2007/liquidity/Daniel_Presentation.pdf

In 2010, Carhart launched his own quant shop (Kepos Capital), hoping to raise $1 Billion. He seems to be facing some skepticism from potential investors about quantitative investing, but he is optimistic.

Loading...