Texas-based Wiedower Capital, an investment firm that focuses on small caps, is bullish on Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE:FC), a performance improvement company headquartered in Utah. In an annual letter to shareholders, Travis Wiedower, the founder of Wiedower Capital, said that “the market is significantly underestimating the quality” of the company’s new business model. He discussed his investment thesis on Franklin Covey in the letter. Let’s take a look at Wiedower’s views about the performance improvement company.
Franklin Covey is a $411-million market cap company that creates and distributes content, training, processes, and tools that organizations and individuals use to improve their performance.
Two years ago, Franklin Covey made a major change to its business model by launching the All Access Pass. Instead of selling content and solutions one course or one solution at a time, the company decided to switch to a subscription as a service model. The All Access Pass allows the company’s clients to purchase unlimited access to FranklinCovey’s content; assemble, integrate, and deliver the content through any of a broad combination of delivery modalities; design customized impact journeys with the help of an implementation specialist; and enjoy a better pricing.
Wiedower believes that:
2018 will be the first year the company is fully lapping the transition to the new business model, so hopefully after a few quarterly results this year the market will start to give the company more credit for their new and improved business.
While looking at the current stock performance, it seems that the company has started gaining attention from investors. Over the last 30 days, the stock has moved up 54%. Since the beginning of 2018, the share price has jumped more than 44%.
Here is everything that Wiedower said about Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE:FC) in the letter:
On the valuation side, I struggle to see how the new business model isn’t more efficient than their old one (customers who auto-renew to your software are better than customers you have to explicitly sell products to every year). From 2013-2015 (before this transition began), my estimates for their normalized earnings margins were 7-8%. Now there’s a lot of noise in the current financials due to the transition, but let’s ignore all that and just guess that their new normalized NOPAT margins with a more efficient business will be 9%—a little better than they achieved with their worse business model. Management’s guidance for 2018 revenue is $227 million (including change in deferred revenue which is real cash in the door). $227 million x 9% = $20.4 million—what I would call owner earnings or NOPAT. I personally believe the company deserves a multiple in the 20s, but even a 20x multiple on those 2018 owner earnings would result in a stock price of $25.28 (~25% above today). If the new business model is more efficient than their old one, it’s hard to justify today’s price. Oh, and that entire calculation is before tax reform. Similar to Parks! America, it’s still unknown how much of the tax cut will drop to the bottom line (increased wages and investments will probably take up a portion), but Franklin Covey is a full tax payer so they will benefit from tax reform more than most. After tax reform, it’s hard for me to get a fair value lower than the high $20s.
Robert Kneschke/Shutterstock.com
For 12 months ending August 31, Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE:FC) reported revenues of $185 million, down compared to $200 million in 2016, and $209 million earlier. The company booked a loss of $7.17 million, or $0.52 loss per share, last year, compared to a profit of $7.02 million, or $0.47 per share, in 2016.
On January 4, Franklin Covey announced financial results for its fiscal 2018 first quarter, which ended November 30. The company’s transition to a SaaS business model seems to be working as sales in the fiscal 2018 first quarter rose 20% year-over-year to $47.9 million. Meanwhile, the company was able to narrow its net loss to $2.39 million, or $0.17 loss per share, versus a loss of $3.96 million, or $0.29 loss per share, for the same quarter of 2016.
In its earnings report, Franklin Covey said it “believes the first quarter of fiscal 2018 represents a key inflection point that will begin a pattern of improved financial performance compared with prior periods.” However, the company noted that the ongoing transition to the SaaS business model may continue to present challenges to its quarterly financial results during certain periods of fiscal 2018 when compared with the prior year.
Meanwhile, Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE:FC) is a valuable stock among the hedge funds tracked by Insider Monkey. There were eight funds at the end of the third quarter of 2017 with bullish positions in the training and consulting company.
Warren Buffett never mentions this but he is one of the first hedge fund managers who unlocked the secrets of successful stock market investing. He launched his hedge fund in 1956 with $105,100 in seed capital. Back then they weren’t called hedge funds, they were called “partnerships”. Warren Buffett took 25% of all returns in excess of 6 percent.
For example S&P 500 Index returned 43.4% in 1958. If Warren Buffett’s hedge fund didn’t generate any outperformance (i.e. secretly invested like a closet index fund), Warren Buffett would have pocketed a quarter of the 37.4% excess return. That would have been 9.35% in hedge fund “fees”.
Actually Warren Buffett failed to beat the S&P 500 Index in 1958, returned only 40.9% and pocketed 8.7 percentage of it as “fees”. His investors didn’t mind that he underperformed the market in 1958 because he beat the market by a large margin in 1957. That year Buffett’s hedge fund returned 10.4% and Buffett took only 1.1 percentage points of that as “fees”. S&P 500 Index lost 10.8% in 1957, so Buffett’s investors actually thrilled to beat the market by 20.1 percentage points in 1957.
Between 1957 and 1966 Warren Buffett’s hedge fund returned 23.5% annually after deducting Warren Buffett’s 5.5 percentage point annual fees. S&P 500 Index generated an average annual compounded return of only 9.2% during the same 10-year period. An investor who invested $10,000 in Warren Buffett’s hedge fund at the beginning of 1957 saw his capital turn into $103,000 before fees and $64,100 after fees (this means Warren Buffett made more than $36,000 in fees from this investor).
As you can guess, Warren Buffett’s #1 wealth building strategy is to generate high returns in the 20% to 30% range.
We see several investors trying to strike it rich in options market by risking their entire savings. You can get rich by returning 20% per year and compounding that for several years. Warren Buffett has been investing and compounding for at least 65 years.
So, how did Warren Buffett manage to generate high returns and beat the market?
In a free sample issue of our monthly newsletter we analyzed Warren Buffett’s stock picks covering the 1999-2017 period and identified the best performing stocks in Warren Buffett’s portfolio. This is basically a recipe to generate better returns than Warren Buffett is achieving himself.
You can enter your email below to get our FREE report. In the same report you can also find a detailed bonus biotech stock pick that we expect to return more than 50% within 12-24 months. We initially share this idea in October 2018 and the stock already returned more than 150%. We still like this investment.
Free Report Reveals
Warren Buffet's Secret Recipe
Our Price: $199FREE
We may use your email to send marketing emails about our services. Click here to read our privacy policy.
