Farmland Partners Inc. (NYSE:FPI) Q3 2023 Earnings Call Transcript

Farmland Partners Inc. (NYSE:FPI) Q3 2023 Earnings Call Transcript October 26, 2023

Operator: Hello, and welcome to Farmland Partners, Inc. Q3 2023 Earnings Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. I’ll now turn the conference over to Mr. Luca Fabbri, President and CEO. Please go ahead.

Luca Fabbri: Thank you, Sarah. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Farmland Partners third quarter earnings conference call and webcast. Thank you so much for giving us the opportunity to share with you our thinking and our strategy. In a format a bit less formal and more interactive than public filings and press releases. Before we really get started, I will turn over the call to our General Counsel, Christine Garrison, for some customary preliminary remarks. Christine?

Christine Garrison: Thanks, Luca, and thank you to everyone on the call. The press release announcing our third quarter earnings was distributed after market closed yesterday. The supplemental package has been posted to the Investor Relations section of our website under the sub-header Events & Presentations. For those of who listen to the recording of this presentation, we remind you that the remarks made herein are as of today, October 26, 2023, and will not be updated subsequent to this call. During this call, we will make forward-looking statements, including statements related to the future performance of our portfolio, our identified and potential acquisitions and dispositions, impact of acquisitions, dispositions and financing activities, business development opportunities as well as comments on our outlook for our business rents and the broader agricultural markets.

We will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures including net operating income, FFO, adjusted FFO, EBITDAre and adjusted EBITDAre. Definitions of these non-GAAP measures as well as reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures are included in the company’s press release announcing third quarter earnings, which is available on our website, farmlandpartners.com, and is furnished as an Exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K dated October 26, 2023. Listeners are cautioned that these statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond our control. These risks and uncertainties can cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations and we advise listeners to review the Risk Factors discussed in our press release distributed yesterday and in documents we have filed with or furnished to the SEC.

I would now like to turn the call to our Executive Chairman, Paul Pittman. Paul?

Paul Pittman: Thank you, Christine. I’ll make a few general high level comments before I turn it back to my colleagues. Most important point, from my perspective is that our stock continues to be very deeply discounted compared to its fundamental intrinsic value sort of as proof of my belief, you may or not noticed, but I bought $1 million worth of stock during the quarter. The — I have never sold a share in the company and continue to grow my position because I’m a firm believer that we will ultimately access that value. We will continue selling assets at good gains and using those funds to pay down debt and buyback stock as long as this significant discount exists. And it’s important to recognize that our gains to-date have been very strong, but we are not selling the assets we like the most.

We are selling assets that probably have been laggards in terms of appreciation compared to the rest of our portfolio. There is, as you may note in the financials, we had one sale that was actually at a substantial discount to what we had it on the books for its Grassy Island Groves. It’s a relatively modest size transaction, but it is a citrus farm in Florida. And we fundamentally threw in the towel and got rid of the farm because that is an industry, in our opinion that will not recover. That is the only citrus farm in Florida we had. But as many of you may know, in the last decade or 20 years or so, you have seen almost a 90% reduction in volumes of citrus in Florida. That is a tide that we just couldn’t swim against and so we’ve just let that farm go and move on.

It’s important to recognize that despite that loss on that farm, the overall returns on the asset sales we’ve made are still very, very strong. What we need to do next is obviously focus some on cost control as we have shrunk the size of the portfolio. We will turn to that as we get later in this year and the beginning of next year. But this strategy is fundamentally creating significant value for our shareholders who decide to stick with us as we continue to execute on the strategy. With that, I’m going to turn it over to Luca Fabbri, our CEO.

Luca Fabbri: Thank you, Paul. I would like to draw your attention to a few data points to kind of outline how we have executed on our strategy so far as Paul has outlined, and as we’ve discussed in past conference calls. In the first three quarters of the year, we have sold 54 properties for total proceeds of about $122 million and approximately 24% gain over net book value. After the close of the third quarter, we have closed on an additional about $2.5 million in asset sales. And we have approximately $65 million of asset sales under contract or in advanced negotiations that we expect and hope to close by the end of the year. Of course, there is — especially on the ones in advanced negotiations, there is still some degree of uncertainties about that.

So we are projecting total asset sales for the year at about $190 million. So far this year, including slightly after the quarter, we have repurchased about 6.4 million shares at an average price of $10.98. So of those $124 million of proceeds so far, we used about $70 million in common stock repurchases. We’ve also paid down about $8 million of Series A preferred. We are now completely out of the market in — on the asset purchases side, we have completed a few transactions. We purchased about $20 million of assets. So we are really focused on improving our portfolio, not just selling assets. Last but not least, I want to draw your attention on the lease renewal cycle and how we are progressing. So far we are about two-thirds of the way, and we are expecting to finish the year and end the lease renewal cycle up about 18% to 20%, and hopefully even a little bit more than that.

I will now turn the call over to James Gilligan, our CFO, for his overview of the company’s financial performance. James?

James Gilligan: Thank you, Luca. I’m going to cover a few items today, including summary of three and nine months ended September 30, 2023, review of capital structure and interest rates, comparison of year-to-date revenue, and updated guidance for the year. I’ll be referring to the supplemental package in my remarks. As a reminder, the supplemental is available in the Investor Relations section of our website under the sub-header Events & Presentations. First, I’ll share a few financial metrics that appear on Page 2. For the three months ended September 30, 2023, net income was up over 280% to $4.3 million, and net income per share available to common stockholders increased to $0.07 per share, largely due to gains on dispositions of assets.

AFFO was down to negative $0.5 million, and AFFO per weighted average share was down to negative $0.01, largely due to elevated interest expense, lower performance in farms under direct operations, and lower auction and brokerage revenue relative to last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2023, net income was up over 160% to $13.9 million, and net income per share available to common stockholders increased to $0.22, again largely due to gains on dispositions of assets. AFFO was down to about negative $50,000, and AFFO per weighted average share was down to $0.00, again largely due to elevated interest expense, lower performance in firms under direct operations, and lower auction and brokerage revenue relative to last year. Next, we’ll review some of the operating expenses and other items shown on Page 5.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization was a little higher in the third quarter of 2023 due to more depreciable assets placed in the service and approximately $150,000 of adjustments made in the quarter. As a reminder, we had approximately $400,000 of adjustments last quarter related to assets placed in the service. Property operating expenses were flat in the third quarter, but a little higher year-to-date 2023 caused by higher property taxes, including a one-time property tax of approximately $150,000 in the first quarter that amount was reimbursed by the tenant and appears as tenant reimbursement revenue. In addition, we incurred a non-recurring expense in the second quarter of approximately $140,000 due to the final reconciliation of cost sharing on a California farm.

General and administrative expenses were a little higher in Q3 2023 due to increased compensation expense, but lower for year-to-date 2023, due primarily to lower stock based comp and lower travel. Legal and accounting expenses were lower in 2023 due to lower litigation spend. Impairment of assets in the third quarter of 2023 that relates to property held-for-sale, this is what Paul mentioned a few minutes ago. These are properties that were under contract for sale as of 9/30 and will close in the Q4. This impairment generally represents the early recognition of a loss on disposition, which by the way is added back for purposes of calculating FFO and EBITDAre. Gain on dispositions was up compared to 2022, demonstrating the appreciation of Farmland sales values over net book value.

Interest expense increased in 2023 due to higher rates. Income tax was a benefit in Q3 and year-to-date 2023 relative to an expense in 2022. This was caused by adjustments within the third quarter of this year that were made to prior period estimates. Next, I will skip ahead to Page 12 to make a couple of comments about our capital structure. Total debt at September 30, 2023, was $422.8 million, down approximately $50 million from the end of last quarter. Fully diluted share count as of October 20 was 49.4 million shares. Moving down the page, we had undrawn capacity on the lines of credit of approximately $157 million at the end of the quarter. We agreed to the last MetLife rate reset of the year that’s MetLife number 10, which was reset to 6.36% for seven years.

As a reminder, we can prepay 50% of that loan in any calendar year without penalty. Next year, we have three MetLife rate resets on debt totaling approximately $44 million. Page 13, provides an overview of our income statement and the building blocks that generate revenue and cost of goods sold. I won’t go through it in detail, but please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Page 14, shows these building blocks for the first three quarters of 2022 and 2023 with comments at the bottom of the page to describe the differences between the periods. A few points to highlight are, fixed farm rent increased between the periods as we acquired properties last year and renewed leases that was offset by dispositions in the current year. Solar, wind and recreation changes were primarily caused by a large solar project in the State of Illinois that began its construction phase in the third quarter of last year.

That quarter, Q3 2022 had a little bump caused by the commencement of that construction process. The first and second quarters of this year benefited from that construction relative to the same quarters in 2022. Q3 2023 variance was caused by small changes due to property dispositions in the quarter and the absence of that construction-related bump in the third quarter of last year. Tenant reimbursements increased in Q1 2023 with that one-time property tax assessment and related tenant reimbursement. Q3 2023 decreased due to property dispositions. In the fourth quarter of last year, we acquired land and buildings for four agricultural equipment dealerships in Ohio under the John Deere brand. The accounting treatment classifies those acquisitions as financing transactions, so they appear on the balance sheet as loans and on the income statement as interest income.

This accounts for the increase in interest income in 2023 compared to last year. Variable payments were down in the first and second quarters of this year due to grapes, row crops, citrus, and tree nuts. Q3 2023 was up largely due to variable payments on row crop farms in the High Plains. Direct operations is the combination of crop sales, crop insurance, and cost of goods sold. It was down year-over-year largely due to citrus and walnuts. Other items decreased due to lower auction and brokerage activity compared to last year. In summary, while the items that comprise fixed payments were up year-over-year, the items that comprise the other categories variable payments, direct operations, and other were down year-over-year. On the next page, Page 15, we have updated the outlook for 2023 using the same building blocks described in the previous pages.

Assumptions are listed out on the bottom. This contemplates that we dispose of approximately $190 million of farms in total for the year, as Luca described. As a reminder, this number is an estimate, and actual results may differ. On the revenue side, fixed farm rent will change with dispositions and new leases signed. Solar, wind and recreation, tenant reimbursements, and management fees, and interest income all have small changes from last quarter. Variable payments decreased due to the outlook for tree nuts farms that pay variable rent. Direct operations, again, that’s crop insurance plus cost — plus crop sales less cost of goods sold is up significantly due to lower expected cost of goods sold on walnut farms under direct operations. Other items have small changes as we have improved visibility as we approach year-end.

On the expense side, general and administrative decreases with lower spend year-to-date 2023. Legal and accounting also decreases with lower spend year-to-date 2023. Interest expense change with updated rates and higher expense year-to-date 2023. Weighted average shares decreased with share buybacks thus far. This results in AFFO in the $7.3 million to $9.9 million range or $0.14 to $0.19 per share, an increase from projections provided last quarter. Down at the bottom of Page 15, we provide some additional information regarding next year. We’ve had various people asking about 2024, so we wanted to provide information where we have visibility. Please keep in mind these values consider the $190 million of dispositions we’re currently considering and, of course, actual results may differ.

Fixed farm rent will be approximately $3 million lower than guidance shown above, due to the full-year impact of farm sales offset by positive lease renewals. Solar, wind, recreation will be approximately in line with guidance shown above. Tenant reimbursements will be approximately $500,000 lower than guidance shown above. This is due not only to asset dispositions, but also the one-time tax reimbursement in the first quarter of this year that we don’t anticipate occurring next year. And also certain lease renewals that traded higher fixed rent for lower tenant reimbursements. Hopefully, this helps describe where we stand, given what we know today. This wraps up my comments for this morning. Thank you all for participating. Operator, you can now begin the Q&A session.

Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. Your first question comes from the line of Rob Stevenson with Janney. Your line is open.

See also China’s Real Estate Bubble and 9 Other Predictions That Turned Out To Be Wrong and 30 Countries with the Most Debt in the World.

Q&A Session

Rob Stevenson: Good morning, guys. Any clarity on this point — at this point on the need for special dividend and potential size of one?

Paul Pittman: Yes. This is — I’ll take that question. This is Paul. This will — we will obviously end up, I believe, with some sort of special dividend. It hasn’t been declared by our Board yet, but I think we signaled that last quarter, and it’s still likely to happen. The exact size is unknown at this point because you’ve got so many transactions that are under contract but not closed. Now, our history is most things that go under contract actually do close, but there’s no assurance at this point. So I think it’ll be probably into December before the exact number is known and put out into the public domain.

Rob Stevenson: Okay. And just to follow-up on that, Paul, I mean I think that we’re all sort of cognizant of the fact that if you’re selling office buildings or whatever that lining up financing today, on the buy side of that, to be able to finance the purchase is difficult. Can you talk about what the environment right now is for farmers and other interested parties to be able to go out there and line up financing at reasonable rates to purchase the assets from you and close in a timely manner, whether or not that’s being held up at all.

Paul Pittman: Yes. I mean this is — it’s a good question because one of the cores of our frustration and my personal frustration is we’re not like all those other real estate assets for the following reasons, the food economy, the farm economy is still incredibly strong, number one. Number two; it’s not driven by institutional investors who have to go finance everything they buy. We’re not office buildings. It’s not a REIT dominated culture in agriculture. It’s a farmer dominated culture. And they got a lot of money in their pocket based on the last couple of years. Of all the farms we put under contract this year, we’ve only had one transaction that didn’t close. It was an institutional buyer, largely for the reasons you’re talking about.

But the farmer buyers are solid and they close these transactions. The final point is that the debt levels in agriculture, on Farmland ownership overall, something like 13%. This is a cash dominated market. Most of these purchasers don’t get any financing, and so it’s just not really an effect for us. Our asset values are appreciating rapidly and continue to do so because they’re so tied to inflation. Market doesn’t get it. I mean I don’t know what else I can do than make a big stock buy to prove to people that at least I am highly confident we are seriously, seriously undervalued. But no, we’re not really worried about the financing market impacting the ability of these sales to close.

Rob Stevenson: Okay.

James Gilligan: Rob, just add that it’s an important distinction that Paul’s drawing. In our sector, buyers and sellers are getting together. Our tenants are doing really well to the extent they draw on working capital lines of credit to support their seasonal needs. Banks are absolutely lending and open for business, and farmers are taking advantage of dedicated ag lenders. That’s an important part of the sector. So it’s a very different sort of market outlook than you might find in a different asset class, as you referred to.

Paul Pittman: Yes, rates are high, but to the extent somebody needs financing for an ag property, there’s plenty of people offering that money.

James Gilligan: And much better to have rates available at an elevated interest cost than no financing available at all.

Rob Stevenson: Okay. Speaking of the dispositions, how are you guys viewing where the sweet spot is right now in terms of the trade-off between paying down debt and repurchasing stock with the proceeds?

Paul Pittman: Well, we’re likely to continue to do both. The exact sweet spot, frankly, depends on interest rate outlook and stock price at the time. I think we’ve been running more like this most recent quarter, we put a lot more money to debt reduction than we did to stock buybacks. If you had to ask me to guess for the fourth quarter, it’d be a 50/50 split, something like that.

Rob Stevenson: And how much of that is determined also by the fact that some of these lines have a 50% max on the payment and wanting to get that done in calendar 2023 versus being doing something the first week of January of 2024.

Paul Pittman: Not — not a big — not a big impact. Although I’ll let James add to that.

James Gilligan: Yes. Yes, Rob, we’re generally paying our floaters off first, which are higher rate today. And should we find ourselves in a position with so much cash that we would want to make additional pay downs. There’s a lot that we can pay without any penalties. We have on our MetLife lines; the lowest amount we can pay in a year is about 20% and the highest is 50%. So that gives us quite a lot that we could choose to pay down should we find ourselves with a lot of cash.

Paul Pittman: And anything that’s at an interest reset date could be fully paid off without penalty. So we have a huge balance sheet flexibility should we suddenly find ourselves with substantial cash from asset sales.

Rob Stevenson: Okay. And James, while I have you, I missed your comment on the crop insurance and why the guidance went up about $400,000 from the prior. What was that in relation to?

James Gilligan: Yes. So some of that is kind of a mix between crop sales and crop insurance and generally just better visibility as we are in different products, as we are sort of into or through harvest, we have visibility as to what’s come off the trees and how that looks. And so we’ve just updated our guidance accordingly.

Rob Stevenson: Okay. And then last one for me, Luca, are there any known non-renewals in the 35% of the leases that you’re left to renew at this point?

Luca Fabbri: Not really. I mean, we tend, as always, to kind of work with our current stable of tenants, if certainly not, no renewals. I mean, we’re not expecting to end up with any farms not leased by the end of the year. That’s not what happens in this industry at all. Occasionally, we choose to kind of improve the quality of our tenant pool by cycling some tenants off and getting new ones, but no negative expectations along those lines at all.

Rob Stevenson: Okay. And you said that you expect that that 35% is going to be up similarly to the 65% in that sort of 18% to 20% range?

Luca Fabbri: Roughly, yes.

Rob Stevenson: Okay. Perfect. Thanks, guys. Appreciate the time this morning.

Luca Fabbri: Thanks, Rob.

Paul Pittman: Thanks, Rob.

Operator: [Operator Instructions]. There are no — oh, my apologies. We do have a question from the line of Tousley Hyde of Raymond James. Your line is open.

Tousley Hyde: Hey, guys, thanks for taking my question. I was just wondering if you could speak to the current environment or sentiment surrounding the renewable energy side of your business. With rates rising and companies kind of looking at areas that can cut costs, have you seen any pullback in demand from such a project?

Paul Pittman: No. The renewable energy demand across the country for ag properties is high and probably accelerating. It’s really got to be looked at on a kind of a state-by-state basis because each state sort of has its own set of policies about that. But the states that have really become aggressive there is just endless demand. I don’t have the exact statistic my fingertips. We have an immense amount of auctioned acres at this point with solar and wind potential. Auctioned acres, as you probably understand, means they’re basically paying you to stand still while they do a three to five-year study of the property to see if it’s feasible. The percentage that end up from auction into permanent projects has gradually grown through time.

Early in this process, six, seven years ago, kind of people were throwing mud against the wall and auctioning every property. Now, they are — because of the size of the auction fees, which are often $50, $60, $70 an acre per year, the solar developers are actually doing quite a bit of due diligence before they even put it under auction. So I — we’re not seeing really any pullback there. As you know, it’s very driven by government policy more than economics. And as long as those policies don’t change, I think there’ll still be quite a bit of demand for that.

Tousley Hyde: Got it. Thanks. That’s all I had. Congrats on the quarter.

Luca Fabbri: Thank you.

Paul Pittman: Thank you.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of John Massocca with B. Riley. Your line is open.

John Massocca: So quick question on the disposition front. Sorry if I missed this in the prepared remarks, but what was kind of the rough split between row crops and kind of permanent crops in terms of maybe assets that were capital recycled out of?

Paul Pittman: Luca, do you know, in dollar terms, because that’s what’s relevant, not acres.

Luca Fabbri: Yes. I would say it’s a relative minority of permanent crops, although we did sell some and we have some under contract still. James is trying to quickly kind of pull some numbers together.

James Gilligan: Yes. As Luca said, it’s mostly row crops that we sold; probably on the order of $25 million of permanent crops is what we sold year-to-date. So the vast majority has been in the row crop side of the portfolio.

Paul Pittman: Yes, that’s largely reflective of the overall portfolio to just put it in context right. We’re talking — we’re about a 25% to 30% specialty crop portfolio, and that’s roughly what we’ve sold of specialty crops.

John Massocca: Okay. And I know most of kind of disposition proceeds are going into kind of paying down debt and buying back stock. But is there a significant difference or a meaningful difference in terms of the yield on dispositions versus what you’re maybe seeing in the acquisition market or the acquisitions you have closed recently?

James Gilligan: Yes, I can take that one. So when we think about sort of what we’re selling and plan to sell this year, we’re looking at, again, if everything closes, we’re looking at selling kind of NOI yield that’s approximately 3%, 3.1%. And we think what we’ve got in the portfolio today, given where we’re at today. We’re sort of trading at a higher yield. And our new acquisitions, we’re targeting stuff that’s north of that. Again, it depends on the region. We’re being very selective, but we’re generally looking at 4% or higher where we can find it.

John Massocca: Okay.

Paul Pittman: Yes, I just want point amplify — I want to amplify the point, though, because it’s incredibly important, and we talk about this almost every quarter. Two-thirds of the total return to Farmland investing is the appreciation side. And so what we’re selling are the farms that are laggards in appreciation for a variety of reasons. That is largely the sales we’ve made. And the investments we’re making are places where we think there is huge upside value going forward. Appreciation rates on Illinois Farmland are materially higher through the last decade or so than almost anywhere in the United States. That is our largest location of investment. Illinois is half the portfolio or something like that, and we’re not selling there and haven’t at least yet to any major degree.

So it’s really important to recognize where the total return to the asset class comes from, and current yield is a highly secondary consideration. It’s total value creation that we’re focused on.

John Massocca: Okay. Understood. And then, one last one, in terms of the in place portfolio, you kind of mentioned that you’re largely out of or entirely out of the kind of citrus business in Florida. Any other places where maybe you’re seeing distress on the permanent crop side? Has any of that kind gotten worse, gotten better, just any kind of color there would be helpful.

Paul Pittman: Yes. I’ll — yes, I mean what’s going, so there is — so first, on citrus, we’re out of Florida. We still have substantial citrus holdings in California, and those have performed reasonably well over time complete due to a disease called citrus greening, which exists in Florida and essentially doesn’t exist in California. There’s been a huge driver of that reduction in Florida citrus I talked about. But to your question of other specialty crops, many of the specialty crops today suffer from two different problems. First is exposure to water risk in California in particular, and that’s exposure to the actual availability of water, but frankly, more significantly, the exposure to political risk surrounding water in the state of California.

So we’re — as we’ve said several times, we’re kind of lightning up on anything in our portfolio that has significant water risk. We sold a lot of assets in Eastern Colorado, for example, for that reason. So the specialty crops that have been struggling, some of the tree nuts, walnuts in particular are difficult at this juncture. There blue — we own a blueberry asset in Michigan, that’s blueberry business in Michigan, is under a significant amount of pressure. The reason for that is that there’s been a massive amount of planting of blueberries in the Pacific Northwest and some in the Southeastern United states. In my opinion, that’s not as good a blueberry, but you don’t get to taste them before you buy them in the grocery store. They’re big, plump, easy to market berries.

And they’re taking a lot of demand away from a Michigan berry, which is much closer to a wild strain berry and is frankly way more flavorful. But the person that goes in the grocery store buys the ones that look really big and uniform in size, and so it’s hurt the Michigan blueberry business. So those are places we have some challenges. They’re luckily relatively small portions of the portfolio.

John Massocca: Okay. I appreciate the color. Thank you very much.

Operator: There are no further questions at this time. I will turn the call back to Luca Fabbri for closing remarks.

Luca Fabbri: Thank you all for joining us this morning. We appreciate your interest in our company and look forward to updating you on our activities and results in the coming quarters.

Operator: This concludes today’s conference call. We thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.