Evans Bancorp, Inc. (AMEX:EVBN) Q4 2023 Earnings Call Transcript

Page 1 of 3

Evans Bancorp, Inc. (AMEX:EVBN) Q4 2023 Earnings Call Transcript February 1, 2024

Evans Bancorp, Inc. beats earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $1.85, expectations were $0.44. Evans Bancorp, Inc. isn’t one of the 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds at the end of the third quarter (see the details here).

Operator: Greetings and welcome to the Evans Bancorp’s Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2023 Financial Results. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce you to your host, Deborah Pawlowski, Investor Relations for Evans Bancorp. Thank you, Deborah, you may begin.

Deborah Pawlowski: Thank you, Alicia. And good afternoon, everyone. We appreciate you taking the time to join us today as well your interest in Evans Bancorp. Joining me here are; David Nasca, our President and CEO; and John Connerton, our Chief Financial Officer. David and John are going to review the results for the fourth quarter of 2023, and provide an update on the company’s strategic progress and outlook. After that, we will open the call for questions. You should have a copy of the financial results that were released today after the markets closed. And if not, you can access them on our website at evansbank.com. As you may be aware, we may make some forward-looking statements during the formal discussion as well as during the Q&A.

These statements apply to future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties, as well as other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from what is stated on today’s call. These risks and uncertainties and other factors are provided in the earnings release, as well as with other documents filed by the company with Securities and Exchange Commission. Please find those documents on our website or at sec.gov. So with that, let me turn it over to David to begin.

David Nasca: Thank you, Debbie. And good afternoon, everyone. We appreciate you joining us today. I will start with a review of the highlights from the past year, including the strategic initiatives we completed in the fourth quarter, and we’ll then hand it off to John to discuss our results in detail. 2023 was a year that can be characterized as one of resilience. With a backdrop of interest rate volatility and economic challenges that accelerated throughout the year, the entire Evans team continued to deliver results. Net income was constrained by margin pressure due to the acceleration of funding costs, which rose faster than asset yields, as banks responded to the steepest Federal Reserve interest – increase in rates in decades and fought to maintain liquidity during a time of industry concern.

We believe we managed this unique environment well by retaining key relationships, deposits and our liquidity position. In addition, growth, while difficult to come by, was attained through our commercial business development and lending activity. The Bank instituted CECL at the beginning of 2023, which provided increased allowance for credit losses of $2.7 million. Our credit trends have remained favorable as we experienced continued improvement in criticized assets and low charge-offs this past year. Combined with improved economic conditions, we saw a muted provision impact in 2023. During the year, we continued proactive measures to control costs, deliver efficiencies and scalability and improve the overall customer experience with new technology and process improvements.

Of note, total non-interest expense for the year decreased about $550,000 or 1%, which reflected our branch rationalization earlier in the year, as well as other initiatives, which were partially offset by investments in technology and the community. The Bank has maintained focus on return of capital to shareholders and total shareholder returns. For the year, dividends totaled $1.32 per share, which was up 5% and equated to a yield of about 4.3%. Turning to the strategic actions taken during the fourth quarter. For more than 20 years, insurance had been an integral part of Evans Bank. Ultimately, we built a successful business that was highly valued. On November 30th of 2023, the company finalized the sale of The Evans Agency to Arthur J. Gallagher & Company for $40 million.

A question could be, why did we sell? Growth in insurance required additional investments and acquisitions have become increasingly competitive, based on how big insurance companies value assets and how they are financing them. We completed a significant amount of research and validated the opportunity that existed for a sale along with exercising what we felt was a fiduciary responsibility to realize the value created. The decision was also driven in part by a recognition that The Evans Agency could realize greater opportunity for success and sustainability, integrated with one of the top insurance and benefits companies in the world. A.J. Gallagher is a growth-focused, insurance-first company with broader scope and scale to provide optimal benefits for all stakeholders.

Of the objectives for the deal, a key one was to ensure a good home for our associates and clients. There were no job eliminations and current leadership in the 60-plus direct employees of the agency were all offered positions with Gallagher. Clients will have access to a greater breadth of insurance expertise in specialty areas, while experiencing the continuity of working with their current talented team of agency associates and leadership. In the end, we believe the combination provides the best opportunity to elevate our customers’ experience and provide our associates significant opportunities for career growth and to flourish with enhanced resources. Gallagher will remain an insurance partner with Evans providing commercial, employee benefits and personal insurance products to our existing and prospective commercial, municipal, public entity and retail clients.

From a shareholder perspective, we believe the rationale was compelling. This was unique opportunity to monetize the strategic investments made in insurance services, and allows us to optimize our capital and unlock value that we do not believe was being recognized in our stock. The sale price represented a substantial premium for the agency at almost 20 years of earnings. It eliminates about $12 million of goodwill and other intangible assets, resulting in approximately $4.55 per share tangible book value improvement. The after-tax gain was approximately $13 million, which provides us with the flexibility to strategically redeploy capital back into our core banking franchise. Given the current environment, we will continue to review a broad range of options to determine the best uses for this capital.

Ultimately, we believe there are ample opportunities to grow and create shareholder value. This includes the balance sheet restructuring that we completed in the fourth quarter, which consisted of selling 78 million of available for sale investments securities, predominantly US Treasuries and government-sponsored agency securities. Proceeds realized from the restructuring totaled $73 million, which were used to pay down short-term borrowings and a $5 million loss was recognized on the sale. This transaction reduces a portion of the Bank’s liability sensitivity, and is expected to improve returns in 2024 by enhancing our net interest margin. John will give you more details on that in a moment. Looking forward, headwinds are expected to continue for community and regional banks with likely pressures on margins, growth and funding until interest rates recede.

An executive in a suit standing in a busy city street in front of a bank, signifying the business of banking activities and insurance agency activities.

We are seeing signs of moderation in deposit cost increases and John will talk to our NIM expectations during his remarks. Although we do not have control over economic conditions, we are focused on what we can impact which is growth in our core banking model and controlling costs to optimize our efficiency. With that, I’ll turn it over to John to run through our results in greater detail. And then, we will be happy to take any questions. John?

John Connerton: Thank you, David. And good afternoon, everyone. For the quarter, we delivered earnings of $10.2 million or $1.85 per diluted share, which was up from last year’s fourth quarter, and the sequential third quarter largely due to the gain from the sale of The Evans Insurance Agency. Offsetting these increases, was the loss from the sale of investment securities and a decrease in net interest income. Net interest income was impacted over both comparable periods by higher interest expense given intense competitive pressure on deposit pricing, which began to accelerate at the start of the year. This more than offset increases in interest income driven by growth in our variable rate portfolios, following the Federal Reserve’s series of rate increases.

As was discussed in our third quarter earnings call in October, the sequential third quarter net interest margin was impacted by 8 basis points from the reversal of approximately $400,000 of interest income, primarily resulting from one large commercial loan that was put on non-accrual. Adjusting for this impact, NIM for the sequential third quarter was 2.87%. Therefore, on an adjusted basis, we saw 12 basis point decrease in the quarter to 2.75%, which although at a reduced pace from recent quarters, continues to be driven by increased interest expense from higher deposit costs. I will talk to our net NIM expectations at the end of my remarks. The $282,000 in the provision for credit losses was predominantly due to the loan portfolio growth and higher reserves on individually analyzed loans, partially offset by peer group metrics and economic factors.

Non-interest income was up from both the linked quarter and the previous year’s fourth quarter as a result of the gain on the sale of our insurance agency, which David discussed in length. The gain was offset by a loss of $5 million from the sale of the $78 million in securities, which were yielding 2.12% and were used to reduce wholesale borrowings with a weighted average cost of 5.30%. The balance sheet restructure has an earned back of 2.2 years and is expected to have a $2.3 million positive impact in net interest income in 2024. Non-interest income was $3.4 million, after removing one-time transactions relating to the gain on sale the insurance agency and the loss on the sale of securities, which is down approximately 30% over last year’s fourth quarter and down 62% sequentially.

Insurance which typically is the largest contributor within this category, had income of $1.6 million, which reflects after the sale of the insurance agency on November 30th, only two months of revenue earned by the agency. This accounted for approximately $600,000 decrease from the prior years’ fourth quarter. A reduction from the sequential third quarter was also impacted by the abbreviated months of operation, and the third quarter had higher seasonal commissions earned from institutional clients. Other income decreased $200,000 from the third quarter of 2023 due to movements in mortgage servicing rights. The decrease from last year’s fourth quarter was primarily due to $200,000 gain on sale of assets that was acquired in foreclosure and sold in the fourth quarter of 2022 and included $200,000 of revenue recognized relating to rents received from the acquired asset prior to the sale.

Total non-interest expense increased $1.9 million from the sequential third quarter and was up $1.4 million from last year’s fourth quarter. The driver of these increases was largely within the salaries and employee benefits line due to greater incentive accruals. As a result of the execution of the strategic sale of Evans Insurance Agency, the company reached performance levels and recognized a corresponding incentive in the fourth quarter. The incentive increased from the sequential third quarter by $2.2 million and increased $1.6 million from the prior year’s fourth quarter. Offsetting both increases from prior periods was the partial quarter of salary activity due to former insurance employees. 2023 full year expenses attributable to the insurance agency was $6.8 million.

Adjusting for the reduction of the expenses related to the insurance agency, the company expects expenses to decrease 1.5% in 2024 from 2023. Turning to the balance sheet, and reviewing movements in the fourth quarter, total loans were up approximately $17 million. Of that, commercial loans increased 2% or $13 million. Net commercial originations were $58 million during the quarter compared with $62 million of net originations in the third quarter. We are being selective in our underwriting decisions, but are seeing opportunities in commercial real estate, including multifamily and warehouse facilities that are meeting our credit parameters. The C&I funding rates remain muted and continue to impact growth in that portfolio. The current pipeline is strong and stands at $75 million at quarter end.

We expect total commercial loan growth to be approximately 4% in 2024. Credit metrics remain sound with non-performing loans remaining flat for the quarter. Criticized loans decreased slightly by $5 million from $76 million at September 30th to $71 million as of the end of the fourth quarter. This is a $21 million decrease from last year’s fourth quarter of $92 million. Average total deposit balances decreased to $1.65 billion during the quarter when compared to $1.87 billion in the third quarter. Reflected in the deposit decrease was the seasonal outflow of municipal deposits and commercial deposits, which is typical this time of the year. However, as has occurred in previous cycles, balances have and are expected to continue to migrate into different products.

Specifically, we are seeing commercial clients migrate funds from the demand deposit accounts and the sweep accounts. And we expect consumer clients to continue moving funds from saving accounts to CDs. At December 31st, the percentage of uninsured and uncollateralized deposits was at 15%. As with many banks, we will continue to fight for deposits by being proactive with pricing and maintaining competitive rates in our markets. Market deposit rates have stabilized during the fourth quarter due to expectations of decreases in Fed Funds during 2024. The Bank is managing its deposit pricing strategy to include balancing liquidity with profitability. Our actions in the market include offering shorter terms on CD products and reserving preferred pricing for [forward] [ph] clients.

We expect that continued competition for deposits will mute growth for the full year 2024 to a low single-digit increase. These trends and pricing pressures continue to impact our margin for the fourth quarter. Our expectation is deposit betas, although the accelerating will continue to increase cost of funds. However, with the impact of the balance sheet restructure, we expect our NIM to be flat in the first quarter of 2024. Beyond the first quarter is difficult to forecast given external macro forces such as timing of potential future Fed rate moves and how competition may play out. But our current expectation is that, NIM pressure moderates further during the rest of the year. With that operator, we would now like to open the line for questions.

Operator: Thank you. We will now conduct the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of Nick Cucharale with Hovde Group. Please proceed with your question.

See also 15 Countries With The Highest Labor Shortages In The World and 20 Highest Quality Fabrics in the World.

Q&A Session

Follow Evans Bancorp Inc (NYSE:EVBN)

Nick Cucharale: Hey, everyone, good afternoon.

John Connerton: Hey Nick

David Nasca: Good afternoon, Nick.

Nick Cucharale: I appreciate the commentary on the near-term NIM outlook for flatness in the first quarter then moderating pressure afterwards. If we start to get Fed cuts in the middle of the year, are you set to benefit substantially?

John Connerton: I mean, I won’t really quantify it, Nick. But yes, rates down from the Fed, we would begin to monitor we would be able to benefit, especially on our cost of funds. But I don’t think it’s not going to be a sea change. But it should stem the tide and moderate our NIM compression even further. And hopefully, as our assets reprice, we’ll start to benefit and see some increase in our NIM.

Nick Cucharale: Okay. And then in light of the capital generated from the sale of the insurance operation and what sounds like another year of moderate loan growth. Are there other capital actions you’re looking at? Are there additional restructurings or buybacks on the table?

John Connerton: Buybacks are on the table. We have looked at those, we’ve talked before, it’s difficult for us to get bulk in that but we’re – that is on the table, and we continue to pursue all our revenues. That’s one of them. We’ve made other investments in things like our Rochester growth, but certainly that’s on the table.

Nick Cucharale: Okay. And then on the securities portfolio, are the sales this quarter or after the sales this quarter, you’re down to 13% of assets. Are we at the point where you’re beginning to add to the investment portfolio? Or is that book still in runoff mode?

John Connerton: Still on runoff mode, Nick.

Nick Cucharale: Okay. And then as it relates to the tax rate, I saw the commentary regarding the non-deductible goodwill in the quarter. What’s your forecast for the effective tax rate going forward?

John Connerton: That should be – around 22%.

Nick Cucharale: Thank you for taking my questions.

John Connerton: Thanks, Nick.

David Nasca: Thanks, Nick.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Alexander Twerdahl with Piper Sandler. Please proceed with your question.

Alexander Twerdahl: Hey, good afternoon.

David Nasca: Hi, Alex.

John Connerton: Hi, Alex.

Alexander Twerdahl: So it seems like the securities transaction you did basically offset the lost earnings from the insurance business, basically, completely? Is that kind of how you thought about doing sort of the size of what you did? Or maybe talk a little bit more about, I guess, exactly how you decided what to restructure in the securities portfolio?

John Connerton: Well I think when we looked at the size of the capital that we wanted to utilize, I think we looked at our capital levels and where we’d like to be probably, Alex is, where the biggest priority, like we knew that we would be taking in this capital from the insurance gain. But we wanted to utilize something for the restructure. But I think what mostly drove it was, we like where our capital rates – ratios are currently to do the things that David just discussed, as far as give us the flexibility to do buybacks, to continue invest in our business.

David Nasca: I think the one thing I’d say also, Alex is, we looked at this thing when we sold the insurance agency, and I’ve been saying it all along. We fast-forwarded like 20 years’ worth earnings. I know people want the current earnings that way, but we’re looking at this is a chance to bring in capital and redeploy that. We calibrated the loss that we wanted to take based on where we want our capital position, as John just said. So I just reemphasized that.

Alexander Twerdahl: Yeah. When you guys think about sort of where you want the capital position, are you looking at TCE ratio? Are you looking at that Tier 1 leverage ratio, I guess, like what’s the metric that you would point towards as being the limiting metric?

John Connerton: Our Tier 1 leverage ratio is kind of what we’re looking at.

Alexander Twerdahl: Okay. And would it be the goal to keep that sort of above 10%?

John Connerton: Well close to 10% within that range.

Alexander Twerdahl: Okay. And then, as we think about loan growth coming on today, maybe talk a little bit about the types of opportunities you’re seeing in terms of the yields relative to the book yield, and is, I guess the lower, the 4% growth, which a little bit lower than maybe you’ve got in years past. Is that driven more by the appetite of your balance sheet? Or are more about the opportunities you’re seeing in the market?

Page 1 of 3