Nick Dell’Osso: Yes and I’ll just add a little bit further specifics there. First of month pricing for November was materially improved and is encouraging around the pickup in demand that you generally see at this time of year. So, the elective curtailments usually end around now, sometime in early to mid-November. That’s a cash market decision, super hard to predict on a daily basis. So, they generally will fall away as you go through November as to whether it’s the beginning of November, the end of November. That’s a function of weather.
Scott Hanold: Got it. Thank you.
Operator: Our next question will come from Charles Meade with Johnson Rice. You may now go ahead.
Charles Meade: Good morning Nick, Mohit and Josh and rest of the Chesapeake there. Nick, I want to thank you for your really succinct explicit comments about 2024. That’s great. I think it probably took a lot with the sales — people question, but I want to ask a question about your LNG strategy. So, I noticed that this Vitol deal, just like the Gunvor deal doesn’t have the — there’s a block missing, a piece missing with the liquefaction. And so I’m curious if you can elaborate a bit on your thinking. Is this kind of an intentional bet that you guys and the Board is making that liquefaction facilities will eventually be overbuilt in the next, call it, five years? Or is it more — is it more along the lines of you want to do what you can now and figure out the rest later?
Mohit Singh: Hey Charles, this is Mohit. Thanks for the question. The way I would like you to think about this is, clearly, there’s a willing seller in Chesapeake, there’s a willing buyer in Vitol. And what we are taking to these liquefaction facilities then is a pre-wire deal where we have a buy and a seller already agreeing upon the terms. So, there is option value that’s embedded in such an arrangement. When you go talk to different LNG facilities, they might need one or two MTPA to get to FID. So, it creates a little bit of a competitive tension with different facilities as we go talk to them and figure out which one meets our requirements and Vitol’s requirements. And the ones that we think about primarily are — what’s the pricing.
What tool are you having to pay is number one? Number two is, is it accessible to our production. So, can we even get our equity volumes to those facilities through transport solutions. Number three would be what kind of accounting treatment are you getting, whether it’s derivative versus non-derivative and credit requirements is another one. And then last but not the least is about the FID timing and probability of getting to. So, when you put all that together, it works for us in this situation, but that’s not to say that this is how we will do the remaining ones, too. I mean, we are clearly looking at a lot of LNG transactions, and we might do it differently in the next one that we announced.
Charles Meade: Mohit, that’s helpful. And then a second follow-up on, I guess, A&D opportunities. I know this is — will be an ongoing discussion for you guys. But there was one major player in the Haynesville, BP, there’s been a lot of turmoil there lately. And I think just yesterday, there was an article saying that maybe they were going to be looking for partners in some of the US onshore assets. And I think someone says they’re looking for partners, they might be open to offers as well. But I recognize that you guys can’t talk a lot, it’s relatively new, and you can’t talk about anything that’s ongoing. But perhaps, Josh or Nick, you could tell me. My impression is that those BP assets are really high-quality assets. They are the old HK petrol and [Indiscernible] assets that those locations would be able to compete favorably in your portfolio. Is that the way you guys see it?
