Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Bank of America Corp (BAC): Looking At Its Key Problems

Page 1 of 2

Bank of America Corp.Something’s obviously very wrong with Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC)‘s bottom line. This is a bank that was earning high-teens — if not low-twenties — returns on equity prior to the financial crisis. Now just eeking out 5% has become the new normal.

For a Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC) bear, it may seem easy to point a finger at the business itself and say that it’s slipping. That is, customers don’t want to bank with B of A, it can’t get any momentum behind its revenue, etc. But I’m not convinced that’s the case.

It’s typical to look at the returns from a bank on the basis of net income divided by total assets (return on assets). What’s less often looked at is the revenue produced by a bank’s assets.

Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC)’s total pre-provision revenue as a percentage of tangible assets was 4.5% based on annualized first quarter revenue. That’s below heady years like 2009 (5.6%) and 2003 (5.5%), but it’s only slightly below the median of all years between 2002 and Q1 2013.

Breaking Down Bank of America Corp (BAC)'s Bottom-Line Woes

Source: S&P Capital IQ, author’s calculations.

There’s still some room for concern over B of A’s top line. And by looking at the changing asset mix on the balance sheet from pre-crisis to post-crisis — more cash, lower loan balances as a percentage of assets — it appears there’s room for the bank to shift gears and generate more revenue from its asset base.

But when we consider the fact that revenue production doesn’t appear to be grossly out of whack with the past, it becomes even more evident that this is an expense issue, not a top-line issue. B of A’s 2012 efficiency ratio of over 80 underscores this.

To me, this suggests Brian Moynihan’s approach with Project New Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC) is the right one — that is, go after unnecessary costs. However, it also suggests this won’t be an overnight process.

The bank’s Consumer Real Estate Services segment is a good example of where expenses are way off track. During the first quarter, the segment produced $2.3 billion in pre-provision revenue and had $4.1 billion in overhead. This is obviously not a recipe for success. Break down that segment further though and you’ll find that more than $3 billion of the segment’s costs come from the Legacy Asset & Servicing subsegment, which includes a lot of the cruddy loans that B of A is trying to run off or get rid of. That loan portfolio shrunk 21% year over year in the first quarter and the number of employees in the segment likewise fell.

Page 1 of 2