Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Bank of America Corp (BAC): Bank Gets Slapped by Appeals Court

Page 1 of 2

It’s safe to say Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC) has seen better days. Besides the abysmal performance of its shares this afternoon — they’re down more than 3% as I write — the nation’s second largest bank by assets received an unwelcome kick in the trousers courtesy of the New York court of appeals.

Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC)

The ruling is part of a long-simmering dispute between the bank and mortgage-bond insurer MBIA Inc. (NYSE:MBI). In short, MBIA Inc. (NYSE:MBI) claims that Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC) (or, more accurately, Countrywide Financial, which B of A acquired in 2008) duped it into insuring a slew of multi-billion dollar mortgage-backed securities that were collateralized by faulty mortgages. B of A said it didn’t, or rather, that even if it did, it shouldn’t have to compensate MBIA for all of the claims the latter paid out to holders of the disputed MBSes.

The case was in front of the appeals court after Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC) challenged a number of the trial court’s rulings. The most important of which was a holding that MBIA didn’t have to prove that defects in the mortgage origination process had led borrowers to default on the loans — this issue is known as “loss causation.” What B of A has been arguing all along is that most of the mortgage defaults over the past few years were caused by the economic downturn and not by any alleged deficiencies in the origination process. Suffice it to say, if this theory were adopted by the court, B of A’s damages would be significantly less.

A second but similarly critical issue is whether or not Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC) need only repurchase loans from MBSes insured by MBIA if the loans are in default. MBIA claims that the bank must repurchase all loans that were originated in a defective manner regardless of their current status. It’s B of A’s position, on the other hand, that it should only be required to repurchase defectively underwritten mortgages that are already in default.

While the maximum damages in this particular case are easily digestible by B of A — they’re purported to be upwards of $3 billion — the problem is that adverse rulings on issues like these could influence judges in other cases involving analogous claims against the bank. And those cases, mind you, could expose B of A to literally tens of billions of dollars in additional damages. In fact, as Reuters’ Allison Frankel recently discussed, two federal judges have already cited the MBIA case for precedent that so-called monoline insurance companies like MBIA need not establish a causal link between underlying loan defects and defaults.

Page 1 of 2