Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

iPhone Monopoly: Apple Wants iPhone Monopoly Lawsuit Thrown Out

iPhone Monopoly: Do you know anything about this lawsuit: Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation 11- cv-06714, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (Oakland)? While some may answer yes, most are probably unsure of what this “code” means. Fortunately, there is an easier explanation. This is the lawsuit claiming that Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) has a monopoly over iPhone apps.

A Leading Company Cheaper Than 90% Of Blue Chips... And It Recently Bounced 12%Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is actually the smart money’s second favorite publicly traded company but hedge funds have started dumping Apple in favor of a surprising financial stock (see which stock hedge funds are buying like crazy).

At this point, Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) has to be sick and tired of all the lawsuits. If it isn’t this one, the Cupertino-based company is fighting with Samsung over patents.

Bloomberg is reporting the following:

“Attorneys who filed the suit in 2011 claim that a monopoly exists because an iPhone user who doesn’t want to pay what developers charge for applications available through Apple’s App Store can’t go anywhere else to buy them. Apple requires iPhone software developers to turn over 30 percent of what they charge for an application, increasing prices and excluding competitors from the iPhone “aftermarket” of applications, they claim.”

Although this sounds good at first, to some, at least, others realize that this does not make much sense. For this reason, Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is hoping to have the case dismissed in the near future.

Apple attorney Dan Wall recently attending a court hearing related to this case in Oakland, California. Here is what he told U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers:

“There’s nothing illegal about creating a system that is closed in a sense”

This prompted an attorney for the other side to ask the following question:

“Can a consumer go somewhere else to buy Angry Birds for the iPhone? If the answer is no, then Apple is a monopolist”

At this point, there is no date set for a ruling. However, it is safe to say that U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has her work cut out for her.

What do you think about this lawsuit? Do you believe that Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is within its rights? Or do you think the company will end up paying big time? Share your thoughts in the comment section below.

Check back here for more updates on iPhone Monopoly.

DISCLOSURE: I have no positions in any stock mentioned.

For more news stories, visit the following pages:

Apple Inc. Market Cap Drops, No Longer Most Valuable Company

Global App Revenue Continues to Grow, Thank the Apple Inc. iPhone

Alex Gauna Talks Apple Inc. vs. Samsung

DOWNLOAD FREE REPORT: Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks

Let Warren Buffett, George Soros, Steve Cohen, and Daniel Loeb WORK FOR YOU.

If you want to beat the low cost index funds by 19 percentage points per year, look no further than our monthly newsletter.In this free report you can find an in-depth analysis of the performance of Warren Buffett's entire historical stock picks. We uncovered Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks and a way to for Buffett to improve his returns by more than 4 percentage points per year.

Bonus Biotech Stock Pick: You can also find a detailed bonus biotech stock pick that we expect to return more than 50% within 12 months.
Subscribe me to Insider Monkey's Free Daily Newsletter
This is a FREE report from Insider Monkey. Credit Card is NOT required.