Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Apple Inc. (AAPL) May Seek Triple Damages in Samsung Case

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) wants to jump on its recent jury victory in a U.S. courtroom where it won a major patent-infringement lawsuit against Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. With a post-trial hearing schedule for Friday in California, where Judge Lucy Koh will decide the final amount of the damages that Samsung would pay to Apple for infringing on several of Apple’s patents.

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)

By federal law, the judge has the discretion to increase the damage award by triple if the judge determines that the patent infringement was willful and deliberate. That would mean the damage award could be set to more than $3 billion.  And Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL), in its usual aggressive stance in defending its patent portfolio, has filed a motion with the judge asking for the highest possible damage award, according to an article published on a Korea media site.

However, there seems to be some mixed opinions as to whether Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) would have a strong case to win the super-sized award. While the jury took just three days to come to the decision that Samsung did infringe on Apple patents, there seems to be some questions about how the awards was handed down and how the jury filled out the 700-question jury decision form. There are charges of “power intoxication” by the jury foreman, who sold some patents for use in Apple Inc. (NADAQ:AAPL) devices and is charged with ignoring jury instructions in filling out the questionnaire and determining the award for Apple.

“Patent rights only benefit society when they encourage innovation that would not otherwise have taken place,” said Santa Clara University law professor Brian Love, who provided an example of how an infringement award like this could be considered unreasonable. “Can Apple credibly claim that it would not have entered the smartphone market, where it is presently enjoying 50 percent profit margins even with competition from Android makers, had it not been able to obtain these broad patents? I think the answer is no.’’

Once again, a courtroom in California will be the focus of the tech world this week, as all eyes will look in to see how Judge Koh will rule on this award. Investors in Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL), like hedge-fund manager Julian Robertson of Tiger Management, may already have the award figured into their holdings, but some may not.

DOWNLOAD FREE REPORT: Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks

Let Warren Buffett, George Soros, Steve Cohen, and Daniel Loeb WORK FOR YOU.

If you want to beat the low cost index funds by 19 percentage points per year, look no further than our monthly newsletter.In this free report you can find an in-depth analysis of the performance of Warren Buffett's entire historical stock picks. We uncovered Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks and a way to for Buffett to improve his returns by more than 4 percentage points per year.

Bonus Biotech Stock Pick: You can also find a detailed bonus biotech stock pick that we expect to return more than 50% within 12 months.
Subscribe me to Insider Monkey's Free Daily Newsletter
This is a FREE report from Insider Monkey. Credit Card is NOT required.