Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Apple Inc. (AAPL), Google Inc (GOOG): The Kind of Money Americans Hate

Flickr, TaxCredits.

Some don’t like talking about it because it’s political, but the shift in wealth inequality is one of the most important economic stories of the last 20 years.

Harvard economist Greg Mankiw — one of the smarter economic thinkers of our day — wrote a thought-provoking paper on wealth inequality this week that makes an important point: No one should (and few do) look down on wealth earned by those who create valuable goods and services. Bill Gates. Mark Zuckerberg. Steve Jobs. These men became astronomically rich, but they transformed our lives for the better — and people love them for it. Mankiw’s paper broadly argues that wealth inequality is a good thing if those getting rich are the Gates, Zuckerbergs, and Jobses of the world. And he’s right, of course.

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)

Here’s the problem, Mankiw writes:

The last thing we need is for the next Steve Jobs to forgo Silicon Valley in order to join the high-frequency traders on Wall Street. That is, we shouldn’t be concerned about the next Steve Jobs striking it rich, but we want to make sure he strikes it rich in a socially productive way.

But he glosses over the fact that this seems to be exactly what’s happening.


18% of those on the 2010 Forbes list of richest Americans made their wealth from the financial services industry. In 1985 (the earliest I could find data on), the figure was less than 1%.

In 2007, the Harvard Crimson reported that 47% of the school’s seniors were entering finance or consulting.

Even after the financial crisis, more than one-third of Princeton’s graduating class went to work in the financial services industry. That’s four times the industry’s share of the overall economy. At Harvard, the figure was 28% as recently as 2008, and 26% at Yale.

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) spent more on patent lawsuits in 2011 than on research and development, according to The New York Times.

Or take these two recent headlines:

“Goldman Sachs receives 17,000 applications for [a 350-slot] internship program”

“Companies Claim Not Enough Qualified Americans For IT Jobs”

Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE:GS) president Gary Cohn commented on the first headline: “The vast majority were highly qualified kids … The amount of resumes we get for full-time [positions] is in the 50,000, 60,000, 70,000 range.”

DOWNLOAD FREE REPORT: Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks

Let Warren Buffett, George Soros, Steve Cohen, and Daniel Loeb WORK FOR YOU.

If you want to beat the low cost index funds by 19 percentage points per year, look no further than our monthly newsletter.In this free report you can find an in-depth analysis of the performance of Warren Buffett's entire historical stock picks. We uncovered Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks and a way to for Buffett to improve his returns by more than 4 percentage points per year.

Bonus Biotech Stock Pick: You can also find a detailed bonus biotech stock pick that we expect to return more than 50% within 12 months.
Subscribe me to Insider Monkey's Free Daily Newsletter
This is a FREE report from Insider Monkey. Credit Card is NOT required.