Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Alcatel Lucent SA (ADR) (ALU), SUPERVALU INC. (SVU): Gross Margins, Employee-to-Sales & Share Price

Alcatel Lucent SA (ADR)Studies show that 75% of all stock market statistics are useless at best — and dangerous at worst. Sifting through analysis can be tough for individual investors, and more information can be an enemy of level-headed investing decisions. Here are three stock statistics that should always be taken with a grain of salt and a pinch of perspective.

3. Gross margins
Gross margins are the easiest answer to the question: How much did it cost a company to sell its product? Gross margins don’t take into account overhead, variable costs, depreciation, taxes, or a variety of other expenses that add up (or really subtract down) to calculate net profit.

For a networking and communications company like Alcatel Lucent SA (ADR) (NYSE:ALU), its gross profit margin clocks in at 30%. That means Alcatel Lucent SA (ADR) (NYSE:ALU) spends $0.70 of every dollar in sales on selling its product. But while the company’s gross margins have slumped around 3% in the last year, operating margins have dropped nearly 10%, and profit margins are down almost 25%.

ALU Gross Profit Margin TTM Chart

ALU Gross Profit Margin TTM data by YCharts.

Different products renders cross-sector comparison useless, and sector-specific investing decisions should ultimately have little do to with gross margins. Although they give investors an idea of each corporations’ selling “starting point,” Alcatel Lucent SA (ADR) (NYSE:ALU) clearly shows that operating margins or net profit margins ultimately provide a clearer picture of a company’s trending value proposition.

2. Employee-to-sales ratio
Every day of our lives, we see examples of inefficient labor. From loitering construction workers to extra-long coffee breaks at the office, investors know that people’s productivity matters.

But unless a company’s profits are nearly exclusively labor-dependent (think massage parlor — no, not that type of massage parlor), there are better stats to rattle off than how many sales an employee accounted for.

Take SUPERVALU INC. (NYSE:SVU) and Whole Foods Market, Inc. (NASDAQ:WFM). Both corporations are consumer-facing retail grocery stores, offering similar products through similar sales models. SUPERVALU INC. (NYSE:SVU) has 35,000 full time employees, while Whole Foods employs 74,000 people, more than double that of its competitor. Yet Whole Foods’ $11.7 billion in 2012 revenue put sales at $158,108 per head, while SUPERVALU’s $17.1 billion equates to $488,571 per employee.

And for the same year, Whole Foods Market, Inc. (NASDAQ:WFM) pulled in $466 million in net profit while SUPERVALU INC. (NYSE:SVU) reported a not-so-super $1.47 billion loss. That means Whole Foods Market, Inc. (NASDAQ:WFM) ended up making $6,297 per worker, while SUPERVALU INC. (NYSE:SVU) lost $41,996 per employee.

Many businesses have moved beyond employee-driven models. Herbalife Ltd. (NYSE:HLF)‘s sales model allows 2.5 million independent distributors to market its products across 80 countries, but the company has only 6,200 full-time employees on its books. With $4 billion in 2012 revenue, that puts sales per employee at either $1,629 per distributor or $656,827 per full-time worker — depending on your calculation.