Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Why Intel Corporation (INTC) Can’t Get Its Arms Around ARM Holdings plc (ADR) (ARMH)

Page 1 of 2

To many long-time tech followers the story of Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) losing control of the mobile market to ARM Holdings plc (ADR) (NASDAQ:ARMH) of the UK makes no sense.

Intel Corporation (INTC)Many are using the resignation of ARM CEO Warren East, as reported by The Guardian, as an excuse to pound the table for a grand Intel counter-attack, as in this Motley Fool piece from Mark Hibben, written just last week.

I’m sorry. But Intel’s problems are much deeper than those people think.

Intel’s Real Problem

I owned Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) stock for about 15 years. I have followed it as a reporter for 30 years. While it’s certainly possible Intel could gain share on ARM in the future, those who predict it so confidently don’t know what they are talking about.

ARM Holdings plc (ADR) (NASDAQ:ARMH) is not Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NYSE:AMD). It’s not Texas Instruments Incorporated (NASDAQ:TXN). It’s not even International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE:IBM), which made the PowerPC chip. It’s not a chip maker at all. It’s a design house. It’s in the business of licensing its designs to anyone who wants microprocessors, and its the leader in low-power designs.

Compared with Intel, ARM Holdings plc (ADR) (NASDAQ:ARMH) is a gnat on an elephant. It may do $500 million in business during a calendar year. Intel does more than 100 times more, over $50 billion.

The difference is that Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) does not just design chips. It makes chips, and it has a huge bureaucracy dedicated to selling chips. The chips it sells are Intel chips, and they’re compatible with other Intel chips. The company is scaled to the needs of Moore’s Second Law, which holds that as chips grow in complexity they cost more to produce.

The problem here is that companies like Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) don’t care about compatibility. They care about control. By licensing an ARM design, by tweaking it through their own people, and by ordering its production in quantity through, say, a Samsung chip foundry, Apple maintains absolute control over its hardware.

Chinese OEMs don’t care about compatibility either. They want orders. They don’t want to design, they want to produce. They don’t want to buy chips, they want to sell production. Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) has failed for over a decade to understand this, and that’s why it lost the mobile game, not just to ARM Holdings plc (ADR) (NASDAQ:ARMH) but to companies like QUALCOMM, Inc. (NASDAQ:QCOM) and Broadcom Corporation (NASDAQ:BRCM), which accommodate this need.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...