Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Unnatural Exposure for PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP)’s Naked Juice

Page 1 of 2

PepsiCo, Inc. (NYSE:PEP)Once you go down the rabbit hole of the government determining what’s “natural” and what’s not, it’s hard to get back out, but food and beverage companies like PepsiCo, Inc. (NYSE:PEP) may need it to do so since plaintiff’s attorneys seem determined to wring cash out of them for dubious violations of labeling laws.

PepsiCo, Inc. (NYSE:PEP)’s Naked Juice brand recently agreed to settle for $9 million a class action lawsuit that the claims of “natural” made on its bottles were misleading or false because they contained unnaturally processed and synthetic ingredients. They were also charged with using genetically modified ingredients.

As readers may know, I’m a proponent of GMO labeling because I believe that when an organism is being manipulated in the lab and being released into the food chain, consumers ought to know they’re ingesting that. Yet while I might not be big supporter of GMO crops, I wouldn’t stop Monsanto Company (NYSE:MON) or Syngenta AG (NYSE:SYT) from developing their seeds. I just want to know if what I’m eating or drinking contains their Frankenfood strains.

But when it comes to claims of what constitutes “all natural,” I’m willing to give food and drink producers a bit more leeway as there’s a certain amount of processing that has to go on to make the goods available. Even the FDA recognizes the difficulty in the task and has posted on its website the reasons behind its reluctance to pursue the issue.

From a food science perspective, it is difficult to define a food product that is ‘natural’ because the food has probably been processed and is no longer the product of the earth. That said, FDA has not developed a definition for use of the term natural or its derivatives. However, the agency has not objected to the use of the term if the food does not contain added color, artificial flavors, or synthetic substances.

And because the regulatory agency has not stepped in, the trial lawyers have filled the void. Whole Foods Market, Inc. (NASDAQ:WFM) has been sued because its “natural” private-label soda contained caramel flavoring, citric acid, and carbon dioxide. Kraft Foods Group Inc (NASDAQ:KRFT)‘ “all natural” Capri-Sun was sued previously because it contained high fructose corn syrup and Kellogg’s Kashi brand has been similarly sued because it contains bromelain, an enzyme derived from pineapples, which requires acetone in its production.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...