Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (ADR) (TEVA): Will The Transition Be Effective?

Page 1 of 2

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (ADR) (NYSE:TEVA)Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (ADR) (NYSE:TEVA), a pharmaceuticals company that makes money off of branded drugs as well as generics, is an interesting example of a company in transition. Investors are currently not well-favored towards Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (ADR) (NYSE:TEVA) given the uncertainty looming over its drug pipeline and the consequences of the new strategy being implemented by its newly appointed CEO, but there is merit in the changes being carried out at this firm.

Copaxone patent expiration – measures to face losses

Let us look at some facts that will help allay concerns surrounding the patent expiration of Copaxone, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (ADR) (NYSE:TEVA)’s blockbuster drug for multiple sclerosis. This drug generates about 20% of the company’s sales, which amounts to about $4.1 billion. The company will lose patent exclusivity for this drug in 2015. A bit of time left for that to happen, so Copaxone can consider launching the generic version of this drug and capturing a large market share.

I offer this suggestion for more than one reason. In the case of Copaxone, this patent expiration can actually turn out to be beneficial if it decides to produce the generic version itself. This is because the company already faces tough competition from the sale of other multiple sclerosis drugs by companies like Biogen Idec Inc. (NASDAQ:BIIB), Bayer, Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) and Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK). The earlier launch of a high-quality generic will not only help it to continue generating revenues from this molecule but also compete against the other branded drugs as a generic.

Yet another reason for which I stress that the company should consider launching Copaxone’s generic, is because Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (ADR) (NYSE:TEVA) says that the drug is a “highly complicated product to develop and manufacture, and given the inability to fully characterize the active ingredients of Copaxone, Teva has serious doubts about any generic applicant’s ability to demonstrate conclusively that the composition of its product is identical to that of Copaxone.” Recently, the company had contested Mylan (NASDAQ:MYL) Pharma’s ANDA (abbreviate new drug application) and given the complexity of the product, can do so successfully in future with other contenders as well. This would give it even more time to prepare itself to be the first to launch the generic.

Teva’s current measures to deal with the patent exclusivity loss include creating a 40 mg 3 times a week dose as a replacement of the present 20 mg dose. This dosage is likely to be more convenient for patients. Additionally, the company is doing research to create drug combinations which would be more efficacious in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. It is also partnering with Active Biotech, in developing and marketing its drug for multiple sclerosis. These measures are taking the company in the right direction in terms of continuing to stay associated with multiple sclerosis therapy development.

New CEO, new strategy – for better and not worse

New agenda for acquisitions and collaborations

While change always brings along challenges with it, the transition being implemented by CEO Jeremy M. Levin, will in some ways make things a bit easier for Teva, I believe. The CEO is not looking at continuing the trend of large-scale acquisitions that the company has been involved with in the past. Buying large rival organizations brings in more managerial challenges than acquiring smaller promising firms. When acquired companies are large, it can be more difficult to integrate them into the acquiring organization and they bring about cost structure inflation issues as well. Smaller companies, not always, but often can be integrated faster and with relative ease.

Additionally, Levin’s previous experience with overseeing the “String of Pearls” model implemented at Bristol Myers Squibb gives hope that his “Constellation of Transactions” M&A strategy will have a strong likelihood of success at Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (ADR) (NYSE:TEVA). I find the approach in Teva’s new deals promising. Milestone payments and staged investments, in my opinion, are the way forward in business transactions. In the licensing deal that Teva has entered with Xenon, the company is supposed to make milestone payments beyond an initial $41 million fee for the development and marketing of XEN402, a molecule for treatment of disorders involving chronic pain. This gives the company the opportunity to invest based on progress rather than blindly bet on a project’s success.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...