Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Stay Away From Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) Despite Earnings Beat

Page 1 of 2

Goldman Sachs (GS)The earnings seasons has already kicked off and Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE:GS) surprised analysts when it reported its performance for the first quarter of the current year. Both earnings and revenues exceeded their respective expectations on higher investment banking revenues. The remainder of the investment thesis will review the latest earnings and compare them with its peers.

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE:GS) reported its performance on April 16. Earnings per share of $4.29 were $0.43 per share ahead of the consensus mean estimate, while revenues of $10.09 billion surpassed expectations by $0.49 billion. The surge in the top line was partially offset by a 7% decline in the bank’s bond trading, which is considered the biggest money maker. This is a cause of concern for the Street as fixed income trading revenues have never felt the pressure equities trading revenues did after the growth in the online equities trading platforms.

Among other highlights is the improvement in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE:GS)’s investment banking revenues of $1.57 billion, which increased 36% over the prior year. The increase was attributed to a significant 63% gain in the bank’s underwriting business. Besides, the bank’s fixed income, currency and commodities division’s revenues fell 7% compared to the linked year. Meanwhile, the bank’s fourth quarter expenses remained flat compared to a year ago. Both compensation and non-compensation expenses were flat. However, the compensation ratio fell to 43% from 44%. During the quarter, the bank repurchased $1.52 billion.

The 12% sequential growth in Investment Banking was attributed to a healthy trend in equity underwriting, which increased 28% over the prior quarter. This was well supported by the 17% growth in revenues from debt underwriting, partially offset by a 5% sequential decline in financial advisory revenues.

Institutional Client Services revenues witnessed 18% growth, largely due to a 58% increase in Fixed income, Currency and Commodities Client Execution, supported by increases in equities client execution and commissions and fees, yet partially offset by a 61% decline in securities services. While equity trading fell 15% to $1.92 billion, the concern was the plunge in fixed income trading.

Revenues from the bank’s Investing and Lending segment increased 5% over the prior quarter. Within this business segment, the bank bets on its own capital. The Investment Management segment of the bank declined 13% over the prior quarter on lower management and other fees.

Despite the well managed expenses and earnings beat, the results were overshadowed by the deterioration in the bank’s trading results. This is because the bank’s investment banking and its own investments are negligible when compared to its equity and fixed income trading.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...