Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Incyte Corporation (INCY), Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD): Pop-Worthy Data, Incyte, but Let’s See More

Page 1 of 2

The phase 2 data that Incyte Corporation (NASDAQ:INCY) presented on Wednesday was downright stellar.

For a subgroup of the patients, the hazard ratio for overall survival in late-stage pancreatic cancer patients taking Incyte Corporation (NASDAQ:INCY)’s Jakafi and Roche‘s Xeloda was 0.47. Put another way, Jakafi and Xeloda improved overall survival by 53% compared to Xeloda alone.

For the same subgroup, Incyte Corporation (NASDAQ:INCY) also said the six-month survival for patients taking Jakafi and Xeloda was 42% compared to 11% for those that received Xeloda alone.

Unfortunately, that’s pretty much all the data the company released, leaving unanswered questions.

What’s the subgroup?
Incyte Corporation (NASDAQ:INCY) wouldn’t say beyond that the patients were “identified prospectively as most likely to benefit from JAK pathway inhibition.” Jakafi, which is already approved to treat the treat bone marrow disease myelofibrosis, works by inhibiting the JAK pathway.

The biotech defined the group prospectively — that is, before the trial began — so it’s not like the company was mining the trial for subgroups where the drug worked. Still, it would be nice to know the rationale for the mystery subgroup.

Incyte Corporation (NASDAQ:INCY)In an interview, Richard Levy, Incyte Corporation (NASDAQ:INCY)’s executive vice president and chief drug development and medical officer, told me the trial wasn’t specifically designed to enroll patients in the subgroup, so the makeup of the general population should match the 50% of patients with the undisclosed characteristic of the subgroup that were enrolled in the trial.

Levy said that the company looked at a “very small number” of characteristics that Incyte Corporation (NASDAQ:INCY) believed might affect Jakafi’s efficacy. I’d have preferred there was only one subgroup, but assuming it’s only a couple, investors should be fairly confident the effect is real. As you increase the number of subgroups, you increase the likelihood you’ll find something, but that also increases the likelihood that you’ll find something that looks like an improvement, but actually just happened randomly.

“We have a lot of comfort that this is a repeatable finding,” Levy said.

Incyte Corporation (NASDAQ:INCY) is likely holding onto the characteristic of the subgroup for competitive reasons. The company doesn’t need to develop a companion diagnostic, so it should be something that Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD) or Cell Therapeutics Inc (NASDAQ:CTIC), which both have JAK inhibitors in development, could easily replicate. As far as I know, neither Gilead’s momelotinib nor Cell Theraputics’ pacritinib are currently being tested in anything other than myelofibrosis. Incyte is already going to have potential competition in myelofibrosis, there’s no reason to give competitors a helping hand in pancreatic cancer.

How many months?
While the hazard ratio looks good, it would be nice to know the median survival between the two treatment groups to see how much longer Jakafi is extending survival.

Levy said the company decided to present the six-month survival data because it was a “more meaningful number.” Median survival, Levy contends, “would have been misleading for the overall effect in this trial.”

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...