How Worried Should Investors Be After Nevada Bans Daily Fantasy Sports?

The ruling that daily fantasy sports constitutes gambling is contrary to the sites themselves trying to promote the activity as skill-based and therefore free from regulation, which certainly seemed like a tough sell. It’s hard to draw a logical distinction between predicting the results of matches (which is deemed gambling) and predicting the performance of individual players in those matches, as being anything but the same crapshoot. Certainly, as long as poker is incapable of gaining classification as being skill-based, it’s hard to see how a case could be made for daily sports games that the player ultimately has no real control over, regardless of whether some players can actually be better at choosing teams than others (which is doubtlessly the case, but again, the same argument could be made for sports betting in general).

The potential ramifications of the ruling could be wide-reaching. For starters, Nevada is only the first of many states that are looking into the legality of daily fantasy sports, with New Jersey, California, and Massachusetts among the other states studying them. There’s also the question of how sports leagues, which have thus far been willing partners and promoters of daily fantasy sports, will react to them being classified as gambling, something they most certainly are not keen to be associated with. The NFL has been particularly staunch in its opposition to sports betting, claiming that it jeopardizes the integrity of the sport, yet has been a partner thus far with both FanDuel and DraftKings. Likewise, MLB has long been against sports betting, yet had a partnership with DraftKings.

While broad regulation may not have a huge impact on the industry in the long-run, it certainly will cause growing pains for it in the near-term, which may pinch the lofty valuations that had been placed on its two major players by investors. It will also prove to be gut check time for some of the media companies which have thus far been supporters and investors of the sites, as scrutiny mounts and gambling regulations loom.

Disclosure: None