Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Ford Motor Company (F), The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT), General Motors Company (GM), Prudential Financial Inc (PRU): Are Pensions Dead?

Page 1 of 2

Fifty years ago, an employee’s last working day looked something like this: a company party filled with cake, balloons, and a ceremony with some kind words from the boss for “a job well done for 40 years of dedicated service,” accompanied by a gold watch, a pat on the back, and a room full of smiles.

But the biggest smile of all was on the face of the retiree. Not only did he know that he’d never have to set his alarm clock again, but he also knew he’d receive a check in the mail, which he could set that gold watch to, for every single month until the day he died. But those days are nearly over.

Not your grandfather’s pension
Pensions have become a much smaller piece of Americans’ retirement savings mix over the past several decades. Specifically, during the past 15 years, employers have shifted their retirement offerings for new employees away from the traditional pension plan your grandpa probably received. In 1985, 89 Fortune 100 companies offered a traditional defined benefit, or pension, plan to newly hired salaried workers. Today only 11 companies on the Fortune 100 list offer such as traditional pension plan. Meanwhile, defined contribution plans — think 401(k)s — have become the norm.

We can chalk up the main reason for the trend to simple dollars and cents. Increased life expectancy, persistently low interest rates, and amplified stock market volatility are all working against traditional pension plans. In addition, many corporate plans must now dig themselves out of massive pension deficits because of not enough money pumped into the plan, coupled with poor planning and flawed assumptions. Put simply, companies don’t want the exposure on their balance sheets and the drag on their bottom lines.

Ford Motor Company (NYSE:F)

In fact, during the most recent earnings season, both Ford Motor Company (NYSE:F) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ:GT) disclosed gaping pension shortfalls. In fact, last year alone, Ford Motor Company (NYSE:F)’s pension deficit widened by a cavernous 21%. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ:GT) contributed nearly $650 million to its plan in 2012, up from a $233 million contribution in 2011. Yet its plan’s funded status is in the hole an extra $400 million versus one year ago. Meanwhile, United Parcel Service, Inc. (NYSE:UPS) reported a fourth-quarter 2012 loss, resulting in part from a $3 billion non-cash pension-related accounting charge. The company faces a $225 million rise in pension costs for 2013.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...