Estee Lauder’s growth prospects
I can understand why the market loves this stock and why it is willing to award it an valuation of nearly 24 times earnings to June 2014. The company has a number of attractive growth drivers:
- An aging demographic and cultural trends that will ensure the skin care business has good long term growth.
- Strong emerging market growth prospects.
- On a relative basis Estee Lauder Companies Inc (NYSE:EL) has more focus on prestige brands than mass and is better placed than, say, Revlon Inc (NYSE:REV) or Avon Products, Inc. (NYSE:AVP) to benefit from the two-tier recovery whereby the high-end fares better.
- Unlike The Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE:PG), it is a more beauty-focused company and should find it easier to innovate and react to changing consumer trends. This is incredibly important as more cultures become a bigger part of its clientele, and unlike Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE:NUS) it is relying on a traditional sales channels rather than multi-level marketing.
- A strategic management initiative (SMI) is intended to considerably increase inventory management and therefore cash flow and return on investment. A key part of this is a SAP deployment.
Putting these things together creates a powerful case for the company.
On the other hand, these drivers have been known for some time. I’m not convinced that Estee Lauder Companies Inc (NYSE:EL) is a good value or is outperforming to the extent that the market is rewarding it.
Estee Lauder’s performance could be better
For brevity’s sake I should note that I covered the stock previously in an article linked here for anyone looking for a primer or background. I have three main points to make on why I think it could do better.
First, the SMI was supposed to produce significant cost savings and improve its operational metrics. This is already happening, but by some measures we could have hoped for a bit more. In the previous article I discussed how Estee Lauder Companies Inc (NYSE:EL) was hoping to increase inventory turn to 3x from 2x. In simple terms this just means it holds relatively less inventory and can decrease working capital requirements accordingly. Ultimately this would help increase cash flow.
Its performance over this issue is best expressed in a graph. These are my calculations based on company data.
I realize that I am probably being a bit harsh here – it is early in the SMI — but we are still a ways away from the 3x figure. This is a metric worth following because it will guide cash flow in the future.
Secondly, the SMI has caused some short term customer service challenges, which led to some delays and products out of stock. Management claimed that these problems were largely dealt with and were expected to have been resolved by the end of the quarter, but I note that the next wave of the SMI roll out has been delayed by six months. The SMI is not entirely going as planned.
