Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Dicks Sporting Goods Inc (DKS), Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (BGFV): Which of These 2 Sporting Goods Companies Has the Most Upside?

Page 1 of 2

Both Dicks Sporting Goods Inc (NYSE:DKS) and Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (NASDAQ:BGFV) sell sports apparel and equipment through their retail stores. Over the last five years, both Dick’s and Big 5 have returned total gains of more than 130%. But a stock’s performance can’t always determine its value, and total returns don’t always tell the full story.

Let’s take a look at these two companies side by side, and identify which is presenting the most upside potential.

A Side-By-Side Comparison

Metric Big 5 Dick’s
Trailing P/E Ratio 20.08 22.71
Forward P/E Ratio 14.04 15.85
Price/Sales Ratio 0.46 1.11
Operating Margin 3.91% 8.97%
Return on Equity 13.74% 18.06%
Revenue Growth (last quarter) 12.70% 4.10%
2013 Comparable Store Sales Guidance 6% 2-3%
Earnings Growth (last quarter) 4,716% 6%

Which Company Is Most Efficient?

First, let’s consider the trailing P/E ratio, which looks at a company’s valuation divided by its net income during the previous 12 months. The forward P/E ratio works the same way, but uses the following year’s income expectations.

As you can see, Dicks Sporting Goods Inc (NYSE:DKS)’s valuation is more expensive compared to its income, on both a trailing-12-month and a future expectations basis. But before you automatically assume that Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (NASDAQ:BGFV) is the cheaper stock, you have to look at other metrics. The market can often award higher P/E ratios to companies with greater expectations or efficiency.

Next, we’ll review the price-to-sales ratio, which is calculated the same way as the P/E ratio, but uses the trailing 12 months of sales, instead of income. By this particular metric, Dick’s is more than twice as expensive as Big 5.

The fact that Dicks Sporting Goods Inc (NYSE:DKS)’s price/sales ratio is more than two times that of Big 5, yet trades with a similar P/E ratio, indicates that Dick’s has greater margins and produces more profit per dollar. This can be seen in the chart above with its operating margin and its return on equity.

During the last 12 months, Dick’s was creating an operating profit of $8.97 per every $100 of revenue. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (NASDAQ:BGFV) produced an operating profit of just $3.91 on every $100 in revenue. A large reason for this difference is because Dick’s return on equity was far greater; indicating much better returns on its investments. Therefore, it is quite clear to see that Dicks Sporting Goods Inc (NYSE:DKS)’s has been the more efficient of the two companies during the last 12 months.

Which Company Is Improving The Most?

All of the metrics discussed so far indicate a company’s value relative to its past performance. Now, let’s compare its current performance metrics to those valuation figures.

In retail, comparable-store sales growth is the most important metric to monitor. If a company’s comparable-store sales figure is growing rapidly, then it’s seeing greater sales volume in individual stores.

The best way to explain its impact is to acknowledge that regardless of whether a store has 100 or 1,000 customers, its electric bill, rent or mortgage, and basic operational costs remain the same. Thus, if a single store can book a greater sales volume, it has more money left over after it pays its basic operational costs. When lots of its stores can make those kinds of improvements, a company becomes more efficient in producing profits.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...