Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST), United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS), WellPoint, Inc. (WLP): Is Obamacare Going to Make Your Spouse a Financial Liability?

Page 1 of 2

With just five weeks and two days left until the state-run exchanges are scheduled to open for business, the reality of health-care reform, and its many unknowns, is beginning to settle in with millions of Americans.

For some, it’s a much needed step in the right direction. Those who earn four times or less of the U.S. poverty level will receive some form of financial health insurance subsidy, which will hopefully lead to better preventative care and lifestyle habits for lower-income individuals.

Conversely, upper-income earners and select middle-class individuals who fall outside this bracket may be on the line for higher health insurance costs and could be subject to an additional tax to help pay for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion depending on their income.

Many of the pros and cons regarding the PPACA, which is more affably known as Obamacare, boil down to political preferences. But, while we all have our own personal political beliefs, the fact of the matter remains that positives and negatives will rear their head from the implementation of this bill. Earlier this week, we saw one of those negatives hit the forefront in a very public format, and it has pundits again questioning whether Obamacare will strap American spending.

The root of concern
The uproar stems from a bifurcation in implementation dates between the individual mandate and the employer mandate. Originally, the entirety of Obamacare was to be fully implemented on Jan. 1, 2014. However, in early July the Obama administration announced that the employer mandate — the part of the bill requiring employers to provide health insurance to their full-time workers or face a stiff penalty of $2,000 to $3,000 per employee if their health care costs exceeded 9.5% of their income – would be pushed back a year to Jan. 1, 2015.

The reasoning behind the delay seemed plausible from the Obama administration — it wanted to see how quickly single payers transitioned into the individual insurance market — but it also left a potential gap between large employers and individuals that could result in the loss of coverage for perhaps 1 million employees.

Is Obamacare going to make your spouse a liability?
But, it’s not just a matter of whether or not employers will drop coverage for current employees; it’s about whether employers will wiggle out of their obligation to take care of an employee’s spouse.

Under the new bill, which has considerably more encompassing coverage options, many businesses are discovering that the costs of subsidizing their employees are rapidly rising. For businesses that put their employees at the forefront, it hasn’t been a big deal. Costco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ:COST) has long since put the health and well-being of its employees first, and Obamacare is merely an extension of the of same practices and standards it already has in place for full-time and part-time employees. Just last year, Costco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ:COST) announced a partnership with Aetna to create what’s called Costco Personal Health Insurance — essentially a way of getting personal insurance at cheaper prices than the current market rates. As you might have expected, Costco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ:COST) also allows spouses on its Personal Health Insurance plans. Obamacare aside, Costco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ:COST) deserves a pat on the back for its labor practices.

The same can’t be said for a number of other businesses, which have resorted to all types of cost-saving methods in recent months. Instead of cutting employees’ hours or laying off workers in order to reduce costs, businesses have simply gotten out their axe and told their employees that their spouses will no longer be covered under their new health plan — or that they’ll be forced to pay through the nose to keep that coverage on their significant other.

What brown can do for you (but not your spouse)
United Parcel Service, Inc. (NYSE:UPS)
is bound to tick off their employee base and consumers by announcing this week that it plans to cut spousal health insurance coverage for some 15,000 employees in 2014 because of the added costs of Obamacare. The move is anticipated to save United Parcel Service, Inc. (NYSE:UPS) $60 million annually and is being done because United Parcel Service, Inc. (NYSE:UPS) feels working spouses should be easily able to obtain health insurance coverage on the individual market. According to USA Today, the move will affect about one-quarter of UPS’ workforce.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...