Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. (CBI), Wells Fargo & Co (WFC): Three Reasons Why Warren Buffett Hates Bonds

Page 1 of 2

“We’re not buying corporate bonds of any kind. Not at these yields.” Warren Buffett

“Bonds are terrible investments now.” Warren Buffett

“Bonds really should come with a warning label.” Warren Buffett

Berkshire Hathaway Inc.It’s no secret that Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK.B) CEO Warren Buffett doesn’t like bonds. The herald Oracle of Omaha has been warning investors to avoid the entire asset class in favor of better alternatives. So why does Buffett dislike bonds so much?

Picking up nickles in front of a steamroller

Today, the nominal yield on the iShares Barclays 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Fund (NYSEMKT:IEF) is about 1.7%.

The key word is nominal. Because the 1.7% yield doesn’t reflect the real change in investor wealth. After factoring in taxes and inflation, investors’ real returns are negative.

Another problem when interest rates are this low is that a small change in yield can have a massive impact on the price of a bond. If yields increase by 1%, the value of the fund will decline almost 10%. If interest rates rise 2%, which would still put yields well below historical norms, this fund would lose nearly 20% of its value.

Several catalysts could send rates higher. A slight uptick in inflation or improvement in the overall economy would encourage investors to rotate out of bonds and into alternatives.

In exchange for this risk: a measly 1.7% yield.

Corporate credit even riskier

The crowding out effect of central bank purchases of government securities is forcing investors to chase yield in increasingly risky securities. Given that these bonds are being priced against artificially priced treasuries, this has to end badly.

Consider Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)‘s recent 30 year debt issue. What will the next three decades bring? Higher inflation? New technology? Who’s to say Apple will be relevant five years from now. There’s no reason anyone should reach for a 30-year bond from a good yet risky company.

The hunt for yield is causing a stampede into junk bonds. Global high yield bond issuance reached a record $148.6 billion during the first quarter, up 25% from the same period last year.

Of course, credit risk is nothing new. What’s different today is how little investors are being compensated to take on that risk. Junk bonds and 30-year Apple debt yield only 100 basis points over U.S. Treasuries.

We’re witnessing a “dash for trash,” in which investors are willing to buy any bond that pays a premium rate no matter how risky.

Better alternatives

So where is Buffett investing Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK.B)’s $85 billion portfolio? Equities.

Productive assets like stocks are, in Buffett’s own admission, reasonably priced. But in addition to higher potential returns, equities will better retain their real value if inflation makes an unwelcome return.

We can find specific examples in the company’s latest SEC 13-F filing earlier this month.

In of its biggest transactions this quarter, Berkshire disclosed a $376 million stake in Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. (NYSE:CBI). Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. (NYSE:CBI) is an energy infrastructure company that provides engineering, construction, and maintenance services. Boasting some of the world’s largest energy companies as clients, the company is positioned to benefit from the development of America’s shale oil and gas reserves.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...