Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Applied Materials (AMAT): Not The Best Way To Play Semiconductors

Page 1 of 2

Applied Materials, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMAT) provides manufacturing equipment for semiconductor companies. The tech company offers products for front-end and computing applications. The slowdown in the PC and computer markets has pressured this space, given that over two-thirds of semiconductors are used in PCs. Billionaire Steve Cohen of SAC Capital added Applied Materials to his portfolio last quarter (check out Steve Cohen’s top picks).

SAC CAPITAL ADVISORS

Applied Materials is expected to still see weakness with sales down 10% in FY2013 after a 12% decline in FY2012. Generally speaking, middle-market semiconductor companies are struggling due to declining growth opportunities. Research firm Gartner expects below-average growth rates for the tech firm’s silicon business, which makes up about half of Applied Materials’ total business. Issues in the solar industry should continue to be a drag on the company, with mobile devices being the obvious driver. This bullish trend will be supported by the adoption of LTE networks in developed nations, including the network’s rapid adoption in the U.S.

From a valuation standpoint, Applied Materials has seen major pressure related to continuing restructuring actions, which now has the stock trading at over 100x earnings. Applied trades at the cheapest on a P/S basis at 1.7x sales and is also one of the cheapest on a forward P/E basis at 13x. This is, however, for good reason, given that its long-term earnings growth rate of 9% is the lowest in the industry.

What about its competitors?

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...