Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Apple Inc. (AAPL) Multi-Touch Patent is Actually Invalid?

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) has made a lot of progress in innovation over the last few years, since it introduced touch-screen interface with its devices like the iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch. However, that patent, which paved the way for Apple’s huge growth and success, has reportedly been challenged via a re-examination request by a prominent intellectual-property law firm which has worked for both Apple and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has posted a provisional ruling that the “Steve Jobs multi-touch patent” is invalid, posting the ruling after a third party challenged the patent and requested a re-examination. Reportedly, the office stated it had issues about virtually every point by which Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) had established in its patent application as a justification for the patent award. One reviewer in the patent office, in fact, made a determination that all 20 claims of the “Steve Jobs multi-touch patent” are invalid – although each claim is very specific in their distinctions from each other.

While this patent is central to most of Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) devices produced now, there have been prior art for touch interfaces dating back at least to the 1990s, according to the CBS News report – with some of it, including a noted doctoral dissertation, being left out of the Apple patent application. That in itself, is pretty unusual for any patent application. Was that just an oversight, or convenience? Apple has 60 days to respond to the provisional finding. What happens then, if the patent is found to be finally invalid?

While it’s not expected to affect Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) to adversely in its legal battles over patents – Apple often claims several patent infringements in its lawsuits, not just one – having that particular patent deemed invalid may open the floodgates in terms of competition and innovation in various multi-touch interface iterations and would weaken Apple’s case as innovator with multi-touch interfaces. These legal battles have been expensive, and investors in Apple stock like billionaire Julian Robertson of Tiger Management seem to be waning in their support. What do you think? How important is this patent to Apple, in your view? Is Apple still an innovator, or a defender of past innovations?

Biotech Stock Alert - 20% Guaranteed Return in One Year

Hedge Funds and Insiders Are Piling Into

One of 2015's best hedge funds and two insiders snapped up shares of this medical device stock recently. We believe its transformative and disruptive device will storm the $3+ billion market and help it achieve 500%-1000% gains in 3 years.

Get your FREE REPORT and the details of our 20% return guarantee today.

Subscribe me to Insider Monkey's Free Daily Newsletter
This is a FREE report from Insider Monkey. Credit Card is NOT required.
Loading Comments...

Thanks! An email with instructions is sent to !

Your email already exists in our database. Click here to go to your subscriptions

Insider Monkey returned 102% in 3 years!! Wondering How?

Download a complete edition of our newsletter for free!