Markets

Insider Trading

Hedge Funds

Retirement

Opinion

Honeywell CEO Calls GE-CPP Deal Positive Amid Persistent Supply Constraints

Honeywell Aerospace CEO Jim Currier says GE’s $11.75 billion CPP deal is positive for the industry as aerospace companies increasingly seek greater control over constrained supply chains.

Honeywell Aerospace Inc. (NASDAQ:HONA)’s CEO Jim Currier described GE Aerospace’s planned $11.75 billion acquisition of Consolidated Precision Products (CPP) as “positive for the industry overall,” while making clear that Honeywell does not directly compete with CPP because the parts it sources differ from those purchased by GE. The deal reflects a broader aerospace shift toward vertical integration as manufacturers struggle with persistent shortages of castings, forgings and other critical components. CPP supplies roughly a quarter of GE’s casting requirements, and GE expects the business to generate about $2 billion of revenue in 2027.

For Honeywell, the more important message is Currier’s indication that the company could bring additional outsourced capabilities back in-house through smaller, complementary acquisitions. That is particularly relevant after Honeywell Aerospace cut its 2026 organic sales-growth outlook to 4%-5% from 7%-9%, citing supply constraints that have prevented it from fully capturing strong aftermarket demand. The company has also quadrupled spending on multi-sourcing and in-sourcing initiatives this year.

Honeywell Could Turn Supply Constraints Into a Capacity Advantage

The CPP transaction validates Honeywell Aerospace Inc.’s own strategy of increasing control over strategically important components rather than remaining dependent on constrained suppliers. Currier said Honeywell has been reintegrating technologies outsourced between 2010 and 2019 and sees further opportunities to do so. That could improve supply reliability, production throughput and ultimately Honeywell’s ability to convert strong aerospace demand into revenue and higher-margin aftermarket sales.

There is already evidence that supply-chain intervention can materially improve output. Honeywell deployed skilled workers into supplier factories to address labor shortages, and Currier said this helped increase production 30% year over year during the preceding 30-45 days. With aerospace demand remaining strong and Airbus reporting a 9% year-over-year increase in deliveries in 2026, better internal and supplier capacity could allow Honeywell to capture more of that demand rather than continuing to prioritize lower-margin original-equipment deliveries over aftermarket opportunities.

Vertical Integration May Not Quickly Reverse Honeywell’s Earnings Pressure

The main risk is that vertical integration requires capital, execution and time, while Honeywell Aerospace Inc.’s immediate constraint is already affecting earnings quality. In the second quarter, sales rose 5% to $4.52 billion, but adjusted EPS fell 32% to $1.87, with supply constraints and an unfavorable mix weighing on profitability. Honeywell has acknowledged that its earlier supply-chain actions were insufficient, meaning additional in-sourcing may not produce a rapid financial payoff.

The GE-CPP deal also highlights how difficult the supply bottleneck remains. GE is spending nearly $12 billion to secure a critical casting supplier because shortages continue to constrain engine production despite strong demand. Honeywell therefore faces an industry-wide capacity problem rather than one it can solve solely through incremental supplier improvements. If it pursues acquisitions to internalize more production, it could also assume integration and capital-allocation risks while its current growth outlook remains only 4%-5%.

Conclusion

Honeywell Aerospace Inc.’s position is constructive toward GE’s CPP acquisition because it addresses the same structural problem Honeywell is trying to solve: insufficient aerospace supply-chain capacity amid unusually strong demand. The news strengthens the case for Honeywell’s increased focus on in-sourcing, multi-sourcing and selective acquisitions, particularly if these actions help restore access to higher-margin aftermarket demand.

However, Honeywell’s 4%-5% 2026 growth forecast and 32% second-quarter EPS decline show that supply-chain remediation has yet to translate consistently into financial performance. The key issue for Honeywell is therefore not demand, but how quickly its capacity investments can convert into higher output, better mix and stronger earnings.

READ NEXT: Gilead Strengthens HIV Growth Platform with Expanded Latin America Access and Truist Reshapes Lending Strategy with $5.5B Auto-Loan Sale

This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.