Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS), Whole Foods Market, Inc. (WFM): Four Stocks for a Rising U.S. Dollar

Page 1 of 2

The U.S. dollar may be in long-term decline, but don’t be surprised if the greenback enjoys a multiyear cycle of buoyancy during this decade. A number of factors are combining to support U.S. dollar strength versus other world currencies. These include:

The winding down of quantitative easing. The Federal Reserve believes that on balance, the U.S. economy has recovered enough for it to proceed with scaling back its monthly purchase of U.S. Treasuries and U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities. Rising interest rates will support a firmer dollar.

Universal Health Services, Inc. (NYSE:UHS)

The U.S. economy is strengthening, and growth may actually accelerate beyond the current 1.8% quarterly GDP increase: Some economists expect U.S. growth as high as 4% in 2014.

Remember the BRIC countries? China is struggling to contain a credit bubble, and Brazil, India, and Russia are each facing unexpected quarterly growth slowdowns. As these countries fight to maintain their growth, their currencies will continue to be vulnerable against the dollar.

The eurozone is still recovering from its ill-fated foray into austerity. New worries in Portugal and Greece are just the latest sign of fiscal fright on the European continent.

What does an appreciating dollar mean for your stock portfolio? Although well-run companies with multinational operations may be poised to post handsome returns in the long run, this is not a bad time to consider investing in corporations that derive most of their sales from within the United States. The reason is twofold: Such companies will benefit directly from the improving domestic economy, and what they earn in dollars they will keep, versus U.S.-based multinationals, which will face some revenue erosion as worldwide currencies slacken against the dollar.

Universal Health Services, Inc. (NYSE:UHS)

Let’s review four well-managed companies that derive all or nearly all of their revenue from inside the United States, and exhibit persuasive investment themes to boot:

Union Pacific Corporation (NYSE:UNP)

The largest U.S. rail transportation company should be able to reap benefits from a rising U.S. economy. In 2012, the company’s overall volume was flat due to weakness in coal and agricultural shipments (as a result of drought conditions across the western United States), which offset strength in other segments such as automobile, chemical, and oil shipments.However, Union Pacific Corporation (NYSE:UNP) managed to increase revenue by 7%, to $20.9 billion, through stronger pricing and fuel surcharges. The higher revenue, coupled with productivity gains, led to record net income of $6.75 billion, outpacing the prior year’s net income by 18%.

The first quarter of 2013 was in some ways a snapshot of the entire year of 2012. Volume was down 2% versus the prior year quarter, again dragged down by weak coal and agricultural shipments.Yet the company managed to grow average revenue per car, or ARPC, by 6%,again by increasing pricing, which resulted in overall revenue growth of 3.5% and net income growth of nearly 11% versus the comparable prior-year quarter. Do you see a pattern here? Union Pacific Corporation (NYSE:UNP) enjoys very high customer satisfaction, and satisfied customers are often less price-sensitive customers. The ability to raise prices during a period of flat volume will again spur higher revenue if volume starts to pick up in the latter half of 2013 and beyond.

Universal Health Services, Inc.  (NYSE:UHS)

King of Prussia, Pa.-based Universal Health Services, Inc. (NYSE:UHS) operates acute-care hospitals and behavioral health centers in the United States and the U.S. Virgin Islands.The company books more than $7 billion in annual revenue, and has grown its quarterly earnings more than 220% over the last five years.

Universal Health Services, Inc. (NYSE:UHS) has declined in recent trading sessions along with other health service providers, following the Obama administration’s decision to delay implementation of a key provision of the Affordable Care Act until 2015: the requirement that employers with more than 50 employees provide health insurance to all employees or face a penalty of $2,000 per employee.

Page 1 of 2