TechnipFMC plc (NYSE:FTI) Q1 2024 Earnings Call Transcript

Page 1 of 6

TechnipFMC plc (NYSE:FTI) Q1 2024 Earnings Call Transcript April 25, 2024

TechnipFMC plc beats earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $0.22, expectations were $0.16. FTI isn’t one of the 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds at the end of the third quarter (see the details here).

Operator: Thank you for standing by and welcome to the TechnipFMC First Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. I’d now like to welcome Matt Seinsheimer to begin the call. Matt, over to you.

Matt Seinsheimer: Thank you, Mandeep [ph]. Good morning, and good afternoon, and welcome to TechnipFMC’s first quarter 2024 earnings conference call. Our news release and financial statements issued earlier today can be found on our website. I’d like to caution you with respect to any forward-looking statements made during this call. Although these forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, beliefs and assumptions regarding future developments and business conditions, they are subject to certain risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by these statements. Non-material factors that could cause our actual results to differ from our projected results are described in our most recent 10-K, most recent 10-Q, and other periodic filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

We wish to caution you not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any of our forward-looking statements after the date they are made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. I will now turn the call over to Doug Pferdehirt, TechnipFMC’s Chair and Chief Executive Officer.

Doug Pferdehirt: Thank you, Matt. Good morning and good afternoon. Thank you for participating in our first quarter earnings call. I am very pleased with the strong performance in the quarter, which further highlights our continuing success in delivering on our commitments. Total company revenue for the first quarter was $2 billion. Total company adjusted EBITDA was $257 million, with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 12.6%, when excluding foreign exchange impacts. Total company inbound orders in the quarter were $2.8 billion. In Subsea, we had a solid start to the year, with first quarter orders of $2.4 billion, representing a book-to-bill of $1.4. Importantly, a significant portion of our inbound was driven by new technologies, several of which were industry first for Subsea that will help unlock opportunities in both new and mature offshore basins.

In January, we announced our first IEPCI for Petrobras, this one utilizing Subsea processing for the MERO 3 HISEP development. The project represents a major industry milestone as it will be the first to use Subsea separation to capture CO2 directly from the well stream for injection back into the reservoir, all of which will occur on the seafloor. During the quarter, we were also awarded the first IEPCI to utilize a 20k production system, this being for Shell’s Sparta project in the Paleo-Gene play in the US, Gulf of Mexico. The 20,000 PSI production system includes new technologies required to meet the demands of high pressure, high temperature reservoir conditions. This marks our third award for 20K production equipment as clients look to produce from deeper waters and reservoirs in the maturing basin.

The Paleo-Gene formation spans the central and western regions of the Gulf of Mexico with reservoirs located in water depths that exceed 1500 meters and generally exhibit higher pressures. The Paleo-Gene has become one of the most productive and fastest growing sources of supply in the Gulf and it is estimated that one billion barrels of discovered reserves will require the use of 20k technology for development. We expect additional projects to successfully move forward over the next 24 months, representing yet another opportunity set for our company. And finally, we announced an award from the Northern Endurance Partnership to deliver the first all-electric Subsea IEPCI, which is anticipated to be inbound in the second half of this year. The partnership, which is a joint venture between BP, Equinor and TotalEnergies, is building CO2 transportation and storage infrastructure for carbon capture projects in the UK’s East Coast cluster.

Our all-electric solution will collect and feed the pressurized gas into an aquifer or permanent storage. All-electric systems drive simplification of the field design, enabling the reduction of infrastructure and installation time through the removal of hydraulic components and simplified umbilicals. The technology also enables the development of projects over long distances. With Northern Endurance, the power and controls to the Subsea equipment will extend 145 kilometers from the onshore host facility. The award of an entirely all-electric Subsea system is a significant achievement for both our company and the industry. MERO 3 high set, Sparta and Northern Endurance are all strong examples of our differentiated technology portfolio. Each of these projects provides a unique solution to an industry challenge and it is this unique combination of innovative technologies and integrated execution that is creating new market opportunities for our company.

While project selectivity remains a critical objective, it is even more important that we successfully deliver on time and on budget as promised. As demonstrated by our financial performance in the quarter, operational execution across the portfolio continues at a high level, driven in part by this focus on project selectivity and the favourable impact it is having on the quality of orders in our backlog. Having both the right backlog and strong execution gives us confidence that we can capitalize on the strong market and achieve our financial targets. Finally, we completed the sale of our Measurement Solutions business in March. In keeping with our commitment to shareholder distributions, a significant portion of the proceeds were allocated to repurchasing $150 million of shares in the first quarter.

A close up of a worker tightening a valve on an oil rig.

This brings our total shareholder distributions to $520 million in less than two years and given this acceleration and share repurchases, we now expect total shareholder distributions in the current year to grow at least 70% when compared to the levels achieved in 2023. I will now turn the call over to Alf.

Alf Melin: Thanks Doug. Inbound in the quarter was $2.8 billion, driven by $2.4 billion of Subsea orders. Total company backlog increased sequentially to $13.5 billion. Revenue in the quarter was $2 billion. EBITDA was $257 million when excluding a gain on the sale of our measurement solutions business of $75 million, restructuring impairment and other charges totalling $5 million, and a foreign exchange loss of $4 million. Turning to the segment results, in Subsea, revenue of $1.7 billion was largely flat versus the fourth quarter. Higher project activity in Brazil and the Gulf of Mexico was largely offset by lower activity in the North Sea and Asia Pacific, and reduced services revenue due to typical offshore seasonality. Adjusted EBITDA was $242 million with a margin of 14%, up 90 basis points from the fourth quarter.

The sequential increase was driven by strong execution and improved earnings mix from backlog. In Surface Technologies, revenue was $307 million, down 14% sequentially. Revenue decreased due to the closing of the sale of Measurement Solutions before the end of the quarter, lower activity in North America, and portfolio optimization in Latin America. Adjusted EBITDA was $41 million, a 21% decrease from the fourth quarter, driven by lower revenue from Measurement Solutions and lower activity in North America. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 13.5%, down 120 basis points versus the fourth quarter. Turning to corporate and other items in the period, corporate expense was $27 million when excluding charges of $5 million, which were primarily transaction-related costs associated with the sale of Measurement Solutions.

Foreign exchange loss was $4 million. Net interest expense was $13 million, which benefited from higher average cash balances in the period. Tax expense in the quarter was $50 million. Cash required by operating activities was $127 million. The outflow follows the typical seasonal pattern of our business. Additionally, cash flow in the period included a payment of $56 million to the PNF. Similar payments will occur in the second and third quarters and will fulfil our remaining obligation. Capital expenditures were $52 million. This resulted in free cash flow consumption of $179 million in the quarter. As Doug highlighted, we completed the sale of the Measurement Solutions in March. Proceeds from the sale were $186 million, with the majority being used for share repurchase.

This drove a significant increase in total shareholder distributions in the first quarter to $172 million, which included $150 million for share repurchase and $22 million in dividends. We ended the period with cash and cash equivalence of $697 million. Net debt was $327 million. Now I will provide some thoughts on our outlook, starting with the second quarter. For Subsea, we expect to benefit from the typical seasonal uplift as well as improved margins in backlog with sequential revenue growth of approximately $200 million and margin expansion of approximately 250 basis points. For Surface Technologies, we expect revenue and adjusted EBITDA margin to be in line with the first quarter. This includes the impact of the sale of Measurements Solutions.

Now I will also give you an update to our full-year outlook. Given the anticipated strength of our first half results and taking into account a range of outcomes, we now expect total company adjusted EBITDA to approximate $1.29 billion when excluding foreign exchange, an increase of approximately $40 million from the guidance we provided in February. Within this total company outlook, we see the following relative to the guidance provided in February. Subsea revenue and EBITDA margin both trending toward the upper half of the guidance ranges. Both revenue and EBITDA margin for Surface Technologies as well as corporate expense remain on track for the midpoint of their respective guidance ranges. Lastly, I want to discuss our current view of our capital structure.

In March, we received an upgrade from Standard & Poor’s to Investment Grade. This upgrade serves as a significant milestone for the company and reflects the tremendous efforts by the entire organization to materially deleverage the balance sheet and achieve investment grade metrics. With this update, we are also revising our target capital structure to approximately $800 million of cash and $800 million of debt, together amounting to zero net debt. This is a $500 million reduction versus our prior target and a level we can achieve over time as scheduled debt maturities come due. Importantly, we believe this capital structure provides us with the flexibility to manage our operations and fund our capital needs while also delivering on our commitment to shareholder distributions.

Operator, you may now open the line for questions.

See also 11 Best Coal Mining Stocks To Invest In and ChatGPT Stock Predictions: 10 Stocks That Have 10X Potential.

Q&A Session

Follow Fmc Technologies Inc (NYSE:FTI)

Operator: [Operator instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Arun Jayaram with J.P. Morgan Securities. Please go ahead.

Arun Jayaram: Good morning. Doug, I wanted to see if you could provide more details on Northern Endurance. What do you think drove your success on the projects? Maybe more details on the scope and perhaps what technologies is FTI providing in terms of the CCS nature of that project?

Doug Pferdehirt: Thank you, Arun and good morning. Look, this was as stated in my prepared remarks a major milestone for our company, but also for the industry. This will be the first application of an all-electric production system. We are extremely, extremely proud to have been selected. There was a very rigorous technical qualification required to be able to be considered and to receive the award and we’re pleased that we came out on top of that qualification. Think of it as everything from the shore to the seafloor. We call it the integrated carbon transportation system. We have a specific CO2.0 tree, so part of our 2.0 family. We have developed a configure to order CO2 injection tree. It looks simplified compared to a traditional oil and gas tree, but it’s actually very technical particularly when it comes to the sealing surfaces because of the number of cycles that you will, the number of times that you were open and closed or what is called a cycle, the cycling of a valve and then in a CO2 injection tree is far, far greater than what you would do in a typical oil and gas development.

So a higher technical standard. We were extremely pleased to be selected for that and we have that entire scope and what’s really interesting about it is the distance that is being traversed is over 145 kilometers and there will be nothing floating on top of the water. In other words, we’ve taken it all subsea much like we did on the CCS project in Brazil. On the HISEP project, it is just a major, major milestone where we are really driving the CCS market by enabling the seafloor to be a key component of these projects.

Arun Jayaram: Great, Doug. And I wanted to see if you could maybe comment. In your prepared remarks, you talked about some new technologies that you’re using to unlock opportunities in more mature basins. I was wondering if you could maybe expand upon that and maybe comment on what you see in some of the more mature basins. I know one of your peers talked about anticipating maybe an improvement in West Africa starting next year, but maybe if you could elaborate on that.

Doug Pferdehirt: Sure. So there’s just the, I would call it the traditional projects that are likely to be driven forward in mature basins given the project economics by doing it with an integrated approach, what we call IEPCI along with our 2.0 family. We can help unlock the economic value of those projects. But specifically what I was referring to was in a mature basin, there’s really two opportunities; is to find a different producing horizon. In the case of the Paleo-Gene, it’s a deeper horizon in the Gulf of Mexico. Or it could just be a further step out from the host facility and so what are the technologies that are the key enablers to get to the Paleo-Gene? It’s 20K and to have a full 20K production system fully qualified, supported by the regulators as well as our clients, major achievement.

As noted, this is our third project. This is the first integrated 20K project to be awarded. And as alluded to in the script, we expect more to come in the future. When you look at the further step outs in a mature basin, that will be enabled by all electric. So this will be the primary application in the traditional energy or the oil and gas environment when it comes to the all-electric production systems; again, enabling a much greater distance, up to three to four times further than you can do via using hydraulic controls to reach back to an existing host facility. So the two key technology enablers in this case being 20K and the all electric. In the case of HISEP, as we talked about in the first quarter, it was advanced CO2 separation, subsea separation technology where we are separating and then re-injecting all on the seafloor.

Operator: Our next question comes from the line of James West with Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

James West: Actually, I saw your results. So I know how you’re doing. You’re doing well. So, I wanted to start a little bit bigger picture and something we’ve talked about a bit in the past. With the backlog that you have now, all of these EPCI contracts coming through. How are you feeling about capacity? Are you starting to really lever into some of these joint ventures and partnerships to add to that capacity to make sure you can deliver on all this backlog?

Doug Pferdehirt: James, a timely question. I would expect that you will see us utilize the support that we have within our ecosystem to be able to continue to grow and expand the IEPCI market and just for those that are not as familiar with the terminology, ecosystem, we made a decision ago that we would restructure the way that the subsea industry operated, both from the integrated projects, but also from the way that we would drive higher asset utilization and drive-through cycle returns to a standard that was not only higher than in the past, but sustainable. And the way we would do that was to work well with others and that’s the personality of our company. We’re not a big monster. We work well with people. We have very deep relationships, and they’re all trust-based and we put a lot of time and effort into that.

So what that’s allowed us to do was to go out to other vessel operators, introduce them to the IEPCI concept and as the IEPCI market continues to grow and become a very significant portion of the total projects that are being awarded today, providing access to our partners to work alongside us on those projects and deliver integrated projects. So that’s what allows us to, if you will, expand beyond theoretical capacity in the installation portion of the projects, but there’s also the manufacturing side of the projects and this is a significant benefit, and I think one that’s not been fully understood, but as you see it showing up in our financial results now, the ability to be able to get leverage by using subsea 2.0 configure to order. It runs through our plant at approximately double the cadence or one half the time as a traditional 1.0, which is what the rest of the industry is building today.

Page 1 of 6