Sensient Technologies Corporation (NYSE:SXT) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Sensient Technologies Corporation (NYSE:SXT) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript October 31, 2025

Sensient Technologies Corporation beats earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $0.96, expectations were $0.75.

Operator: Good morning and welcome to the Sensient Technologies Corporation’s 2025 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal the conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today’s remarks, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touch tone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Tobin Tornehl. Please go ahead.

Tobin Tornehl: Good morning. Welcome to Sensient Technologies Corporation’s earnings call for 2025. I am Tobin Tornell, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sensient Technologies Corporation. I am joined today by Paul Manning, Sensient Technologies Corporation’s Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer. Earlier today, we released our 2025 third-quarter results. A copy of the earnings release and the slides we will be using during today’s call are available on the Relations section of our website at sensient.com. During our call today, we will reference certain non-GAAP financial measures, which remove the impact of currency movements, costs of the company’s portfolio optimization plan, and other items as noted in the company’s filings.

We believe the removal of these items provides investors with additional information to evaluate the company’s performance and the comparability of results between reporting periods. This also reflects how management reviews and evaluates the company’s operations and performance. Non-GAAP financial results should not be considered in isolation from or a substitute for financial information calculated in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures is available in our press release and slides. We encourage investors to review these reconciliations in connection with the comments we make today. I would also like to remind everyone that comments made during this call, including responses to your questions, may include forward-looking statements.

Our actual results may differ materially from those that may be or are implied due to a wide range of factors, including those set forth in our SEC filings. We urge you to read Sensient Technologies Corporation’s previous SEC filings, including our 10-K and our forthcoming 10-Q, for a description of additional factors that could potentially impact our financial results. Please keep these factors in mind when you analyze our comments today. I will now turn the call over to Paul Manning.

Paul Manning: Thanks, Tobin. Good morning and good afternoon. Earlier today, we reported our third-quarter results. I am pleased that we continued to build on our strong first half of the year and delivered 14% local currency adjusted EBITDA growth and 18% local currency adjusted EPS growth. Local currency revenue grew 3.5% during the quarter. We continue to have particularly strong results from the Color Group, delivering 8% local currency revenue growth and 24% local currency operating profit growth. Flavors, extracts, and flavor ingredients product lines within our Flavors and Extracts Group also had a nice quarter, delivering 4.5% local currency revenue growth and significantly contributing to the group’s local currency adjusted operating profit growth of 7.8%.

These results align with our expectations and position us for a strong finish to the year. We are also increasing several elements of our full-year guidance for 2025. Previously, we indicated local currency adjusted growth of high single digits for EBITDA and high single-digit to double-digit for EPS. We now expect double-digit local currency adjusted growth in both EBITDA and EPS. The major storyline for Sensient Technologies Corporation and the industry continues to be the conversion of synthetic colors to natural colors in the United States. This activity remains at the forefront of our current strategic focus and continues to accelerate as we work with our customers to prepare them for this change. As before, the U.S. conversion to natural colors is the single largest opportunity in the company’s history.

Over the years, we have invested significantly around the world to increase our production capacity and to optimize our product portfolio. We are also working to build a resilient supply chain that provides the botanicals necessary to produce natural colors. Aside from our work to support these anticipated conversions, our emphasis on sales execution, customer service, and the commercialization of new tech continues to drive our current performance. During the third quarter, we continued to generate strong new sales wins across each of our groups. These sales wins are a result of our innovative product portfolio across our food, pharmaceutical, and personal care product lines. These new sales wins and our pricing discipline are not only driving our revenue growth but are also the main reasons for the margin strength we are seeing across each group.

We remain focused on collaborating with our customers to support their development requirements, and our sales pipelines remain robust in each of our regions. We continue to win new business across the company, despite a flat overall consumer market. Growth in the North American and European food and beverage sector has been stagnant for the last several years. New product launch activity continues to be down across many categories in the Americas and Europe, and Q3 was a continuation of the trend. Also, as I mentioned during our last several calls, the current trade and tariff landscape introduces additional complexity and uncertainty to our business. While we have already taken price actions to offset the impacts of the initial wave of tariffs, and will continue to take these pricing actions into next year, we have witnessed some demand and volume disruptions in some areas of our business due to this uncertainty, particularly in Asia Pacific.

We will continue to position our supply chain organization to minimize any disruptions to our customers and to optimize the flow of goods. Now, turning to Slide 6 in our group results.

Paul Manning: The Color Group had excellent third-quarter results, delivering 7.9% local currency revenue growth and 23.8% local currency operating profit growth. The group’s third-quarter adjusted EBITDA margin improved to 24.7% from 22.2%, an increase of 250 basis points versus the prior year. This margin improvement is a testament to our efforts to sell technically differentiated products, control costs, execute on our pricing strategy, and deliver quality new wins. In the third quarter, the group saw strong new sales wins. While these wins were particularly impressive in natural colors, let me clarify that the wins recognized in the third quarter are not yet the result of any significant conversions of existing products in the United States.

The Color Group remains on a great trajectory, and I could not be more excited about the future ahead of us. Turning to Slide 7, the Flavors and Extracts Group saw local currency revenue decline in the third quarter by 1.2% but increased local currency operating profit by 7.8%. The group’s adjusted EBITDA margin was 17.7%, up 130 basis points versus the prior year’s comparable quarter. The Flavors, Extracts, and Flavor Ingredients product lines delivered 4.5% local currency revenue growth and significant local currency operating profit growth. The growth in these product lines is a result of our innovative flavor technologies and our focus on new and defensive flavor wins across North America, Europe, and Latin America. Turning to our Natural Ingredients business.

We have renamed that business to Sensient Agricultural Ingredients. Sensient Agricultural Ingredients consists of dehydrated onion, garlic, capsicums, and other vegetables. To this point in the year, the business has been impacted by lower sales volumes and significantly higher crop costs. We expect improvements to begin in Q4 2025. Despite these dynamics in the Agricultural Ingredients business, I still expect the Flavors and Extracts Group to deliver solid results for the year. Now, turning to Slide 8. The Asia Pacific Group saw volume headwinds in the third quarter, delivering flat local currency revenue and local currency operating profit. The group’s adjusted EBITDA margin was 24.2%, up 40 basis points versus the prior year’s third quarter.

The flat revenue is a result of lower volumes within certain selling regions that we expect to persist through the end of this year. The Asia Pacific Group is equipped with strong leadership and operations, and the group’s new sales wins momentum sets it up nicely for 2026 and the future. Turning to Slide 9 regarding our full-year guidance. We now expect our local currency adjusted EBITDA and EPS to grow at a double-digit rate. Our previous guidance called for high single-digit local currency adjusted EBITDA growth and high single-digit to double-digit local currency adjusted EPS growth. We are maintaining our consolidated full-year local currency revenue guidance of mid-single-digit growth. On the capital allocation front, last quarter, we increased our capital expenditure guidance to be around $100 million to ensure that we are prepared for the forthcoming natural color conversion activity.

The increased investments we are making in natural colors are a great use of our cash. Over the next couple of years, we anticipate elevated capital expenditures. We will give more guidance on our 2026 capital estimate in February; however, as of now, we anticipate our total capital expenditures in 2026 to be at least $150 million as we continue to invest in our natural color capabilities as well as across our Flavors and Extracts in Asia Pacific Groups. Beyond capital expenditures, we will continually evaluate sensible acquisition opportunities, but we do not anticipate any share buybacks at this time. Now, before I turn the call over to Tobin, I would like to provide more information on the current state of the synthetic color regulation and natural color conversion activity, along with a few of our innovative technologies.

Turning to Slide 10. The regulatory environment and effective legislation have not seen much change since the last time we spoke. West Virginia became the first and still the only state to pass legislation that prohibits the sale of food products containing synthetic colors. There has been no change on timing, and that law goes into effect in January 2028. Additionally, Texas has passed legislation requiring food manufacturers to place warning labels on packaged food products that contain certain ingredients, including synthetic colors and titanium dioxide, effective 2027. As I have stated, the main effect of these state actions is the conversion to natural colors at the national level. Across the country, companies are stepping up and committing to converting their existing products and setting conversion timelines to meet that January 2028 deadline.

Today, we have approximately $100 million of synthetic color revenue that has the potential to be converted to natural colors. Previously, we had valued this opportunity at about $110 million. However, it appears less likely that we will see wholesale conversions in the pet food and over-the-counter pharmaceutical spaces. As I said before, the conversion to natural colors results in revenue multiples of approximately 10 to one on average. Turning to Slide 11. The FDA is now maintaining a master tracking list on their website of commitments within the industry and progress made towards those commitments. Under the parent companies currently recognized, as of today, more than 50 brands have pledged the replacement of FD & C synthetic colors. These include some very well-known and highly colored products.

We have also recently seen Walmart announce that it will eliminate synthetic dyes in all of its private label products by 2027. This change was noted by Walmart to be a direct response to end consumer demand. Turning to Slide 12. I would now like to take a moment to highlight CertiSure, our product safety program for natural colors. This internal standard has been in place for years and guarantees customers a high level of product safety and quality. Raw materials go through rigorous screening for pesticides, heavy metals, microbiological adulteration, and unauthorized solvents. We hope this program will become the market standard for all suppliers and are working with the FDA to support the development of a national testing protocol as we enter a more natural world of color.

As we have done for the last several quarters, I would now like to highlight some of our innovative technologies. Currently shown on the slide is some information about one of our most successful natural color products, Pure S Orange. This novel paprika-based solution is a clear testament to the efficacy of the CertiSure program. Paprika is a widely popular source of color solutions with usage across a variety of categories, but it is also a high-risk raw material. Around 60% of paprika raw material lots fail Sensient Technologies Corporation’s CertiSure screening. These failures are often due to exceeding levels of pesticides and adulteration. While our CertiSure program prevents the use of contaminated raw materials, it appears that other companies may not have such stringent standards as Sensient Technologies Corporation, as we frequently see our failed lots of paprika go back into the open market for others to procure.

Only batches that pass our CertiSure process are used to make innovative color technologies like Pure S Orange. Pure S Orange leverages a clean purification technology to achieve the industry’s brightest and clearest natural orange. While there are other great natural orange options like annatto, beta carotene, and carrot juice, none of them compares to Pure S’s stability and clear, vivid orange in beverages. As we have discussed and as experience in the market has shown, converting to vibrant natural colors is critical for brands conducting the transition of their products. It is our goal to help our customers succeed and to preserve their brands through this transition. Turning to Slide 13. Next, I want to highlight some exciting technology from our Flavors and Extracts Group that can play an important role as companies open up formulas and perform some of the necessary reformulation work that will accompany the conversion to natural colors.

First is BioSymphony, a signature innovation that elevates the flavor profile for a number of different product categories. BioSymphony gives developers the flexibility to elevate the taste perception of their products and to enhance the overall taste experience. Second is PURA Mask technology. It includes a range of products that are ideal for balancing taste and neutralizing off notes that could originate from various ingredients in a customer’s product. This portfolio is effective in addressing a wide variety of taste issues, from bitterness relating to high-protein ingredients or potential off notes from the incorporation of natural colors. In summary, our R&D and supply chain efforts are centered around providing safe and consistent products.

If you would like more information on our natural color or taste modulation technologies, please visit our website. Overall, I am pleased with our financial performance in the third quarter. We are on track to deliver a strong performance in 2025. I am excited about the growth opportunities within each of our groups. Our pipeline for natural color conversions continues to build. Customers continue to refine their launch timelines, so we can provide more definitive guidance on revenue timing going forward. Looking ahead to 2026, we will give more detailed guidance coming in February. However, we continue to expect our long-term growth rate to be incremental to this growth rate. As I mentioned earlier, we anticipate our capital expenditures to be north of $150 million in 2026 to support our natural color conversion preparation activities.

The growth we are experiencing is a direct result of the execution of our strategy and seizing the opportunities in the markets in which we operate. I remain optimistic about 2025 and the future of our business. Tobin will now provide you with additional details on the third-quarter results.

Tobin Tornehl: Thank you, Paul. In my comments this morning, I will be explaining the differences between our GAAP results and our non-GAAP or adjusted results. The adjusted results for 2025 and 2024 remove the cost of the portfolio optimization plan. We believe that the removal of these costs produces a clearer picture of the company’s performance for investors. This also reflects how management reviews the company’s operations and performance. Turning to Slide 15, Sensient Technologies Corporation’s revenue was $412.1 million in 2025 compared to $392.6 million in last year’s third quarter. Operating income was $57.7 million in 2025 compared to $50.5 million of income in the comparable period last year. Operating income in 2025 includes $3.3 million, approximately 9¢ per share, of portfolio optimization plan costs.

Operating income in 2024 included $1.2 million, approximately 3¢ per share, of portfolio optimization plan costs. Excluding the cost of the portfolio optimization plan, adjusted operating income was $61 million in 2025 compared to $51.7 million in the prior year period, an increase of 15.7% in local currency. Interest expense was $7.3 million in 2025, down from $7.7 million in 2024. The company’s consolidated adjusted tax rate was 23.8% in 2025 compared to 23.1% in the comparable period of 2024. Local currency adjusted EBITDA was up 14.3% in 2025. Foreign currency translation had a minimal impact in 2025. Turning to Slide 16, cash flow from operations was $44 million in 2025. Capital expenditures were $20 million in 2025, and as Paul indicated, we still anticipate our capital expenditures to be around $100 million for the full year of 2025.

Our net debt to credit adjusted EBITDA is at 2.3 times as of September 30, 2025. Overall, our balance sheet remains well-positioned to support our capital expenditures and sensible acquisition opportunities, our long-standing dividend. As Paul indicated, we will continue to invest in our natural color production capabilities and capacity. These investments will remain elevated for the next few years, and we expect to drive favorable volume and profit growth in the years to come. Turning to Slide 17, revisiting our 2025 guidance. We expect our consolidated full-year local currency revenue growth to be mid-single digits. We have now raised our local currency adjusted EBITDA to double digits. Previously, our expectations were high single-digit growth.

We now expect our local currency adjusted EPS to be up double digits in 2025. Last quarter, we guided high single to double-digit growth. We expect our fourth-quarter interest expense to be around $7.5 million, and we expect our fourth-quarter adjusted tax rate to be around 24%. Based on current exchange rates, we still expect the impact on EPS to be a slight tailwind for the year. Considering our GAAP EPS in 2025, we now expect approximately 28¢ of portfolio optimization plan costs. We expect our GAAP EPS in 2025 to be between $3.13 and $3.23, compared to our 2024 GAAP EPS of $2.94. Thank you for participating in the call today. We will now open the call for questions.

Q&A Session

Operator: We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then 1 on your touch tone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then 2. Our first question comes from Ghansham Panjabi from Baird. Please go ahead.

Ghansham Panjabi: Hey, guys. Good morning. Hope you are doing well.

Paul Manning: Morning.

Ghansham Panjabi: Well, thanks. I guess, first off, it sounds like you have honed in on the $100 million in sales as it relates to food and nutraceuticals and the potential with that conversion, etc. Can you give us a sense as to what portion of that is in the process of reformulation conversion? Clearly, regulations are moving around, and there seems to be a sense of urgency with these public mandates and polls that a lot of these companies have announced, as you pointed out in your slide deck. But can you just quantify that in terms of backlog?

Paul Manning: Well, let me think I get where you are going with this one, Ghansham. The $100 million, I mean, it is a cross-section of really a whole range of customers. In fact, it includes everything from candy to beverage to baked goods to processed foods, you name it. In fact, as I noted in the comment, really, the only thing that you would probably exclude from this longer-term may even be pet food and pharmaceutical OTC. So that said, any customer that I have spoken with or any of our sales folks or other leaders have spoken with, everybody is moving in this direction. The only real variable here, I think if you go back a few months, I would tell you that there were probably three groups of customers. Group one, they were doing it, going there, knew they were gonna have to do this and wanted to do this.

There was another group, maybe group two, was a bit more, “We need to kind of understand where this may make some sense, which products.” And then there was a group three that, I must tell you, was a bit more cautious. Perhaps wondering if this was really gonna happen, if there was really gonna be a requirement here? Even just the last few months, I do not hear anything of a group three anymore. And I would tell you that just about every company out there is either well down the path of this, working very, very diligently, or it is really the bucket two that has probably evolved to “yeah, we are gonna do it. We just need to figure out which ones go first and which ones go last in terms of how we prioritize.” So there is a strong expectation from customers that this deadline on 01/01/2028 is the deadline.

There is really no kind of playing around with that one. And so I think everyone that we are speaking with, every customer and every prospect, they’re fully aware of the requirement. And it is going to be either sometime in 2027 or sometime in 2028. But one way or the other, I think everybody gets there. In 2028 is certainly the goal that we observe.

Ghansham Panjabi: Sure. But it does take time for the reformulation and so on, and I think senior technical people are, you know, a big part of that process. So I guess that is what I am referring to. Is the activity starting to match up with the customer’s narrative as it relates to wanting to push towards natural at this point?

Paul Manning: Yeah. Well, I think you said it perfectly. These are like new launches, and new launches are very, very complex, and they can take some time. And, you know, beyond just the formulation challenges of trying to match a synthetic color, selecting the right colors to include in that formulation, there is stability testing. How well does that color do in that formulation? They may have never experimented with that particular beverage or that candy or that baked good. So there is a need to conduct stability testing. Will this color still look good? Will this formulation hold up six months down the line after it has been sitting in a warehouse or on a store shelf? Many companies will do test marketing. How does the consumer perceive this product?

Do they like it? Is it aligned very strongly with the taste expectations? And then, you know, there are a thousand other elements that go into these launches, and the bigger the company, the bigger the risk. There are regulatory questions. There is repackaging. Production scale-up. So it is a massive, massive undertaking. What has happened here is that the biggest multinationals who may have hundreds of products that they are reformulating, they are essentially doing hundreds of launches, relaunches, within a fairly narrow window and time frame. And so, yeah, it is a complicated game. You know, it gets less complicated as you get to smaller customers who maybe have a handful of products that they are looking to launch. They still have to contend with all those factors that I just described.

But that is what puts a lot of, you know, if folks wanna ask me when is it gonna happen, what percent by what month, and what date? Well, that is a hard question to answer because most of our customers have not necessarily definitively pointed out a specific timeline for all these hundreds and dozens of products that they may be reformulating. So yeah. But your comment there really gets at what is the complexity of predicting precisely when somebody launches? And that is why I encourage folks just to remember it is 01/01/2028. That is nine quarters from now. So there is not a whole heck of a lot of variability that would be associated with these outcomes, I would suggest right now.

Ghansham Panjabi: Okay. That is very clear. And then on the Food and Pharma growth of almost 11% during March, what exactly is that being driven by if you are saying that you are not really benefiting yet from the $100 million converting etc. and how much of that 11% growth is being driven by maybe new wins in natural color? How would you think about that?

Paul Manning: So the reason that business is growing so well is because we have a really good strategy. We are focused on really understanding why we win and why we are successful at customers. We are very selective about the types of projects and customers we want to work with. We tend to say no to business that does not align very closely with our strategy. So you are going to see us continue to avoid commoditized high volume here today, gone tomorrow, let me send out a bid and win this by a penny type business. We stay away from that stuff. So we very much insist on having that differentiated, defense business model. And so that means that the product starts with product performance. So we have great, great products that we continue to use today.

Many have been developed over the years, and we continue to develop them. But I would tell you that is a considerable source of our success. We continue to have exceedingly robust service levels across the board. And this is on the basic blocking and tackling of the business—samples and documents and salespeople showing up, and being responsive—that is certainly a foundation for why we are successful there as well. But you know, the natural colors, we are generally regarded as a very good natural color company. And so we have got really great products. We have products that I would argue others do not have and certainly do not have them to the same level of precision and consistency. And so I think our customers recognize this more and more.

They see us as a tremendous resource, not just for providing color or flavor or cosmetic ingredients, but all the other components of making their launch and their business successful. So I think it is just a continuation of the ongoing strategy. Nothing particularly new that I would comment we did during Q3, but what I would note is, I think I asked Tobin before this, “What was the final amount of conversion in Q3?” You know, products that were synthetic that converted to natural. And we have calculated less than a million dollars. So that is not at all driving those results right now. So when those conversions start happening, it should be a real exciting time around here.

Ghansham Panjabi: Okay. I look forward to it. Thank you so much.

Paul Manning: Okay. Thanks, Ghansham.

Operator: The next question comes from Lawrence Scott Solow from CJS Securities. Please go ahead.

Lawrence Scott Solow: Great. Thanks. Appreciate that. It was some good call, Paul. I just follow up on that, I guess. On the 100 million target, I guess, to change, that is obviously your existing customer base. Curious, there is a whole outside of your current share on the synthetic side. I suppose there are lots of customers out there who are using synthetic colors today who will be switching to natural, who are not a customer of yours today, at least on that synthetic piece, but I suppose are target. So I am just kind of curious, you know, outside of that. I know you focus on that initial 100, but I suppose there is a much greater circle outside of that. And then, I guess, on the flip side, is there also a possibility that some of this 100 million, yes, they have to get away from synthetic, but are there cases where there is not a 10 to 1 conversion, or they may not have a great alternative for them to get to that exact color and maybe they do not get a match color and can go on a cheaper route to get a much, you know, even like Pepsi’s has this naked out there?

So I am just kind of, you know, throwing out other alternatives to where you go natural, but not necessarily that exact color match in a 10 to 1 revenue ratio. Thanks.

Paul Manning: Alright. I see where you are going there. So the first one, the 100 million. So the simplest way to look at this is 100 million at that 10 to 1 ratio. Now, to your point, are we gonna get all 100 million of that? No. Do you know why? Because I do not necessarily want all 100 million of that. Some of this stuff, you know, there is a whole range of natural colors. There’s the very strongly performance-driven, technically differentiated variety. And then, there is the sort of the belly wash commodity variety. And it is a spectrum. And so our business has very strongly focused on the former and largely ignored or avoided the latter. And so in that 100 million, yeah, there may be some synthetic colors that lend themselves to less expensive, exciting natural color solutions.

We may be less interested in some of those. But then again, there are some synthetic colors in the market out there, not in that 100 million, that maybe were not real interesting to us as a synthetic color. Maybe we just never had that business. But you know what, when those convert to natural, it is really technically challenging. It is really performance-based stuff, and we would be super excited to get it. So, you know, it is all those pluses and minuses. So I think right now, we use 100 as kind of just a good benchmark. You are absolutely right. There are pluses or minuses within that. And, you know, we will keep you folks kind of posted, I think, as we continue on this journey. But I like our chances. We have been putting in a heck of a lot of work, and there are a lot of folks bringing this thing together.

But, you know, the nice thing is this is a culmination of fifteen-plus years in this company. So as I said before, this is very much the long game strategy in this company. And so I think we have a very good chance and very good opportunity here to win some very, very nice looking projects. Now, to the second part of your question, kind of that 10 to 1, yeah, that too is an average. So think of it this way: the brighter a product appears and the more harsh the manufacturing environment it took to bring it to you, the higher that ratio is going to be. So think about maybe something that got baked in an oven, and it has got a natural color. That may be a higher ratio than 10 to 1. Still has that bright vivid, but it is being produced in a very, very tough, harsh environment.

So heat, light, hot low acid conditions like a low pH, these are all very, very damaging to color. I think I told you, if you look at that sofa in your room and by the sunlight, that chair is just not as brown as it used to be. Well, that is what happens to color in food and beverages, too. So, it is trying to find ways to retain that vibrancy despite those really tough situations. Those types of products lend themselves to a higher ratio. Now, on the other end of the spectrum, to your point about guys like, “Well, you know, I just want this lightly colored. I’ve got it in an opaque package. Or, you know, I am gonna get really cute and try to take color out.” Well, a couple of things on that. So, first of all, some of those would come in, obviously, at lower than a 10 to 1 ratio.

But I think our guidance to our customers is you want to match, and you need to match the synthetic color. All the data and all the cautionary tales in the market suggest that if you go with less than the synthetic color match, you’re putting your brand at risk. Because consumers’ first complaint, more than any other, it seems, they are upset that the flavor has changed. So, the color is very strongly tied to the flavor expectation of a product. And when you modify that in a way that off the standard, consumers will revolt in some cases. And then still in other cases, they may just simply not like it because the color does not look as good. So those are the reasons that we guide our customers and advise them to go with the best match possible that gives you the best chance to be as successful as possible.

But I am not going to deny that. I am sure there will be a handful of brands out there who, again, will attempt to use less color, or no color, or put it in an opaque package and, you know, try their luck with that. But I do not believe anybody has ever demonstrated that to work in any market that I am familiar with.

Lawrence Scott Solow: No. No. That all makes sense. Really helpful. One quick follow-up, Paul. Just you mentioned no real change in regulations or ongoing legislation things in the last few months. Just any thoughts on the potential change on the general recognized as safe? I guess the FDA may tighten regulations a little bit on that where you actually are now required to file something where I think prior, previously, it’s or currently, it’s kinda self-governed, basically. Right? Does that could that potentially have any effect on your business at all?

Paul Manning: Not really. The GRAS standard that you are referring to is specific to colors. Colors, I continue to argue, are the most regulated food product in the world. Synthetic colors anyway. In as much as every manufacturing batch has to be approved by the FDA, certified by the FDA. But even to get the right to manufacture those products, you have to petition the FDA for use of that product in food. And so that involves an extensive set of testing, pathological testing, quality control, and all sorts of parameters. And so that is the case with a natural color. If you would like to add one, there is no GRAS process for adding natural colors. One would have to actually file with the FDA and petition that, again, go through that rigorous process.

So now, there could be impacts on other components of the business. For example, flavors, which do not have that equivalent color additive petition, but that would not be applicable to the cosmetic business. So there could be, but that is a rather vast and extensive part of the food world today. So attempting to modify that, I will be interested to see what that proposal could look like. That would be a, that may bring elements of the food industry to an absolute halt in terms of bringing new products into the market and introducing new ingredients. And so I think that is an interesting conversation. Ultra-processed foods is another one. And so I think a lot remains to be seen on those two fronts. But I think there is a lot of good discussions underway on both of those.

Lawrence Scott Solow: Gotcha. Great. I appreciate all the color. Thank you.

Paul Manning: Okay. Alright. Thanks, Larry.

Tobin Tornehl: Thanks, Larry. Go Jets.

Operator: Again, if you have a question, please press 1. And our next question comes from Nicola Tang from BNP Paribas. Please go ahead.

Nicola Tang: Hi, everyone.

Paul Manning: Hi, Nicola. Hi.

Nicola Tang: I want to stick on the color topic, but then I do have some questions on other divisions as well.

Paul Manning: On

Nicola Tang: Colors, you mentioned in the remarks that even Walmart, you know, is also committed to committing some of its products towards natural colors. Well, firstly, how do you see other private label brands also following suit? How meaningful could this be from a Walmart or a general private label point? And given these tend to be lower price point items, do you see any impact in terms of this conversion price, I guess, to Larry’s earlier question around whether some of those customers might choose to compromise on vibrancy or something else? That’s my question.

Paul Manning: Okay. So yeah, I think Walmart, the largest retailer, certainly in the U.S. market, their declaration that their private brands, Great Value being one of them, will convert to natural colors by 01/01/2027, was a big move in the right direction for the natural color market and this whole notion about conversion. Many folks have sort of wondered, is this really going to happen? Could these deadlines slip? Could this maybe just be a facade, and it’s really not going to happen? I really do not think that is going to happen. And Walmart making this an expectation and moving up the timeline a year earlier than West Virginia, I think is a very positive development. Because again, consumers want natural colors. So I suppose you could say, well, why don’t we give consumers what they want?

And certainly, that is what Walmart has said that they intend to do. They want to give consumers what they want. So they deliberately made this edict, and they intend to do that by 01/01/2027. So that may move some of the other launches to the left, which again could be a positive. We certainly do not want everybody to attempt to convert their products by 2027 because that would be physically impossible. This move is important for that reason. Now, and because of its size and its influence, it is very, very meaningful for other brands and private labels to follow suit, to be competitive with those brands that are converting. With respect to this generating lower price points, I do not think so. I think that, you know, when you look at a lot of products, raw materials are not, in fact, in general, they are not the driving cost behind bringing a product to market.

Now, synthetic colors represent almost nothing to the cost of a product on an individual SKU basis, but as you convert to naturals, they certainly become more expensive. And in most applications, it becomes somewhat at the level of a flavor, which is to say, still fairly small on the annals of raw materials but substantially more than they would have been paying for a synthetic color. So, I do not necessarily anticipate that being dilutive in any way to, certainly, by no means is that dilutive to the quality expectation of natural colors. I mean, these are fairly well-established brands and very, very strongly performing brands. So I think they have every expectation, I would assume, to have the highest performing colors in their products. So, no, I do not think that there’s any diminishment of quality or price or anything else between private label and brand on a product like a natural color.

Nicola?

Operator: It looks like her line has dropped.

Paul Manning: Oh, okay. Yeah. There are no more. Hopefully, I did not make her upset with it.

Operator: There are no further questions at this time. I will turn the conference back to the company for closing remarks.

Tobin Tornehl: Thank you for joining the call today. That concludes our prepared comments. If you have any follow-up questions, please reach out to the company. Have a great day.

Operator: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect.